Cited by 672Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and TherapiesAutoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders ResearchBiosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods

Tocilizumab monotherapy versus adalimumab monotherapy for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (ADACTA): a randomised, double-blind, controlled phase 4 trial

Open access
Gabay, Cem, Emery, Paul, van Vollenhoven, Ronald, Dikranian, Ara, Alten, Rieke, Pavelka, Karel, Klearman, Micki, Musselman, David +3 more·2013·The Lancet

Abstract

Background Roughly a third of patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with biological treatments receive them as monotherapy. Tocilizumab--an inhibitor of interleukin 6 receptor signalling--has been studied as monotherapy in several clinical trials. We assessed the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab monotherapy compared with adalimumab monotherapy for patients with rheumatoid arthritis.Methods We did this randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, phase 4 superiority study in 76 centres in 15 countries in North and South America, Australasia, and Europe. We enrolled patients who were aged at least 18 years, had severe rheumatoid arthritis for 6 months or more, and were intolerant to methotrexate or were inappropriate for continued methotrexate treatment. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1; block size of four) to receive tocilizumab 8 mg per kg bodyweight intravenously every 4 weeks plus placebo subcutaneously every 2 weeks or adalimumab 40 mg subcutaneously every 2 weeks plus placebo intravenously every 4 weeks for 24 weeks. Investigators, patients, and sponsor personnel were masked to assignment. The primary endpoint was change in disease activity score using 28 joints (DAS28) from baseline to week 24. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01119859.Findings We screened 452 patients and enrolled 326 patients. The intention-to-treat population contained 325 patients (163 assigned to tocilizumab, 162 assigned to adalimumab). Week 24 mean change from baseline in DAS28 was significantly greater in the tocilizumab group (-3·3) than in the adalimumab group (-1·8) patients (difference -1·5, 95% CI -1·8 to -1·1; p<0·0001). 16 of 162 (10%) patients in the adalimumab group versus 19 of 162 (12%) in the tocilizumab group had serious adverse events. More patients in the tocilizumab group than in the adalimumab group had increased LDL-cholesterol, increased alanine aminotransferase concentrations, and reduced platelet and neutrophil counts.Interpretation Tocilizumab monotherapy was superior to adalimumab monotherapy for reduction of signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis in patients for whom methotrexate was deemed inappropriate. The adverse event profiles of tocilizumab and adalimumab were consistent with previous findings.Funding F Hoffmann-La Roche.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(13)60250-0

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gabay, C., Emery, P., van Vollenhoven, R., Dikranian, A., Alten, R., Pavelka, K., Klearman, M., Musselman, D., Agarwal, S., Green, J., & Kavanaugh, A.
Affiliations
  • University Hospital of Geneva (CH)
  • University of Leeds (GB)
  • Genentech (US)
  • Roche (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Kavanaugh, Arthur
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-05
Volume
381
Issue
9877
Pages
1541-1550
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2102207725
Cited by
672
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 64 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 66 · 2017: 63 · 2016: 58 · 2015: 63 · 2014: 66 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 1
FWCI
57.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Roche
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Autoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders Research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
Keywords
rheumatoid arthritis, tocilizumab, adalimumab, monotherapy, IL-6 receptor inhibitor, TNF inhibitor, DAS28, disease activity, methotrexate intolerance, adverse events, LDL cholesterol, alanine aminotransferase, drug safety, biologic therapy comparison
MeSH terms
Adalimumab, Adult, Aged, Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Antirheumatic Agents, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review