Quality of care, risk management, and technology in obstetrics to reduce hospital-based maternal mortality in Senegal and Mali (QUARITE): a cluster-randomised trial
Abstract
Background Maternal mortality is higher in west Africa than in most industrialised countries, so the development and validation of effective interventions is essential. We did a trial to assess the effect of a multifaceted intervention to promote maternity death reviews and onsite training in emergency obstetric care in referral hospitals with high maternal mortality rates in Senegal and Mali. Methods We did a pragmatic cluster-randomised controlled trial, with hospitals as the units of randomisation and patients as the unit of analysis. 46 public first-level and second-level referral hospitals with more than 800 deliveries a year were enrolled, stratified by country and hospital type, and randomly assigned to either the intervention group (n=23) or the control group with no external intervention (n=23). All women who delivered in each of the participating facilities during the baseline and post-intervention periods were included. The intervention, implemented over a period of 2 years at the hospital level, consisted of an initial interactive workshop and quarterly educational clinically-oriented and evidence-based outreach visits focused on maternal death reviews and best practices implementation. The primary outcome was reduction of risk of hospital-based mortality. Analysis was by intention-to-treat and relied on the generalised estimating equations extension of the logistic regression model to account for clustering of women within hospitals. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number ISRCTN46950658. Findings 191,167 patients who delivered in the participating hospitals were analysed (95,931 in the intervention groups and 95,236 in the control groups). Overall, mortality reduction in intervention hospitals was significantly higher than in control hospitals (odds ratio [OR] 0·85, 95% CI 0·73-0·98, p=0·0299), but this effect was limited to capital and district hospitals, which mainly acted as first-level referral hospitals in this trial. There was no effect in second-level referral (regional) hospitals outside the capitals (OR 1·02, 95% CI 0·79-1·31, p=0·89). No hospitals were lost to follow-up. Concrete actions were implemented comprehensively to improve quality of care in intervention hospitals. Interpretation Regular visits by a trained external facilitator and onsite training can provide health-care professionals with the knowledge and confidence to make quality improvement suggestions during audit sessions. Maternal death reviews, combined with best practices implementation, are effective in reducing hospital-based mortality in first-level referral hospitals. Further studies are needed to determine whether the benefits of the intervention are generalisable to second-level referral hospitals. Funding Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Maternal and perinatal death reviews, when implemented alongside training and development of local leadership, might lead to significant reductions in maternal and perinatal mortality.
“There is evidence to suggest that maternal and perinatal death reviews, when implemented alongside training and development of local leadership might lead to significant reductions in maternal and perinatal mortality [20–22]”
Cites
Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes
Ivers, N., Jamtvedt, G., Flottorp, S., Young, J. M., Odgaard-Jensen, J., French, S. D., O'Brien, M. A., Johansen, M., Grimshaw, J., & Oxman, A. D. (2012) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd000259.pub3 · Cited by 5,485 · see citing works
Evidence-based, cost-effective interventions: How many newborn babies can we save?
Darmstadt, G. L., Bhutta, Z. A., Cousens, S., Adam, T., Walker, N., & de Bernis, L. (2005) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)71088-6 · Cited by 1,541 · see citing works
Local opinion leaders: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes
Flodgren, G., Parmelli, E., Doumit, G., Gattellari, M., O'Brien, M. A., Grimshaw, J., & Eccles, M. P. (2011) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd000125.pub4 · Cited by 1,070 · see citing works
Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes
Jamtvedt, G., Young, J. M., Kristoffersen, D. T., O'Brien, M. A., & Oxman, A. D. (2006) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd000259.pub2 · Cited by 912 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kerber, K. J., Mathai, M., Lewis, G., Flenady, V., Erwich, J. J. H., Segun, T., Aliganyira, P., Abdelmegeid, A., Allanson, E., Roos, N., et al. (2015) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/1471-2393-15-s2-s9 · Cited by 231 · see citing works
Implementing maternal death surveillance and response: a review of lessons from country case studies
Smith, H., Ameh, C., Roos, N., Mathai, M., & Broek, N. V. D. (2017) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-017-1405-6 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
on behalf of the CRADLE Trial Collaborative Group, Vousden, N., Lawley, E., Seed, P. T., Gidiri, M. F., Charantimath, U., Makonyola, G., Brown, A., Yadeta, L., Best, R., et al. (2019) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-019-0885-3 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Russell, N., Tappis, H., Mwanga, J. P., Black, B., Thapa, K., Handzel, E., Scudder, E., Amsalu, R., Reddi, J., Palestra, F., et al. (2022) · Conflict and Health · doi:10.1186/s13031-022-00440-6 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
van Tetering, A. A. C., Segers, M. H. M., Ntuyo, P., Namagambe, I., van der Hout-van der Jagt, M. B., Byamugisha, J. K., & Oei, S. G. (2021) · JMIR Medical Education · doi:10.2196/17277 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
- Authors
- Dumont, A., Fournier, P., Abrahamowicz, M., Traoré, M., Haddad, S., & Fraser, W. D.
- Affiliations
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine (CA)
- Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Dumont, Alexandre
- Venue
- The Lancet
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-07
- Volume
- 382
- Issue
- 9887
- Pages
- 146-157
- ISSN
- 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
- 0140-6736
- OpenAlex
- W2131908953
- Cited by
- 140
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 16.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Lancet (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- World Health Organization
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (200602MCT-157547-RFA-CFCF-100169, 81275)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and fetal healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
- Keywords
- maternal mortality, emergency obstetric care, quality improvement, risk management, referral hospitals, best practice implementation, quality of care, West Africa, Senegal, Mali, audit and feedback, health professions education, obstetric care
- MeSH terms
- Clinical Competence, Emergency Treatment, Female, Health Workforce, Health Personnel, Hospitals, District, Humans, Inservice Training, Mali, Maternal Mortality, Obstetrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Hospital, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Pregnancy Outcome, Prenatal Care, Quality of Health Care, Risk Management, Senegal, Cluster Analysis, Hospital Mortality, Practice Guidelines as Topic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review