Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 252

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Human infection with avian influenza A H7N9 virus: an assessment of clinical severity

Open access
Yu, Hongjie, Cowling, Benjamin J, Feng, Luzhao, Lau, Eric HY, Liao, Qiaohong, Tsang, Tim K, Peng, Zhibin, Wu, Peng, Liu, Fengfeng, Fang, Vicky J, Zhang, Honglong, Li, Ming, Zeng, Lingjia, Xu, Zhen, Li, Zhongjie, Luo, Huiming, Li, Qun, Feng, Zijian, Cao, Bin, Yang, Weizhong, Wu, Joseph T, Wang, Yu, Leung, Gabriel M·2013·The Lancet

Abstract

Background Characterizing the severity profile of human infections with influenza viruses of animal origin is a part of pandemic risk assessment, and an important part of the assessment of disease epidemiology. Our objective was to assess the clinical severity of human infections with the avian influenza A(H7N9) virus that has recently emerged in China. Methods Among laboratory-confirmed cases of A(H7N9) who were hospitalised, we estimated the risk of fatality, mechanical ventilation, and admission to the intensive care unit based on censored data during the currently ongoing outbreak. We also used information on laboratory-confirmed cases detected through sentinel influenza-like illness (ILI) surveillance to estimate the number of symptomatic A(H7N9) virus infections to date and the symptomatic case fatality risk. Findings Among 123 hospitalised cases, 37 cases had died and 69 had recovered by May 28, 2013. Hospitalised cases had high risks of mortality (36%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 26%–45%), mechanical ventilation or mortality (69%; 95% CI: 60%–77%), and ICU admission or mechanical ventilation or mortality (83%; 95% CI: 76%–90%), and the risk of these severe outcomes increased with age. Depending on assumptions about the coverage of the sentinel ILI network and health-care seeking behavior for cases of ILI associated with A(H7N9) virus infection, we estimated that the symptomatic case fatality risk could be between 160 and 2,800 per 100,000 symptomatic cases. Interpretation We estimated that the severity of A(H7N9) is somewhat lower than A(H5N1) but higher than seasonal influenza viruses and influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 virus. The estimated risks of fatality among hospitalised cases and symptomatic cases are measures of severity that should not be affected by shifts over time in the probability of laboratory-confirmation of mild cases and should inform risk assessment. Funding Ministry of Science and Technology, China; Research Fund for the Control of Infectious Disease and University Grants Committee, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China; and the US National Institutes of Health.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(13)61207-6

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 252

Metadata

Authors
Yu, H., Cowling, B. J., Feng, L., Lau, E. H., Liao, Q., Tsang, T. K., Peng, Z., Wu, P., Liu, F., Fang, V. J., Zhang, H., Li, M., Zeng, L., Xu, Z., Li, Z., Luo, H., Li, Q., Feng, Z., Cao, B., Yang, W., Wu, J. T., Wang, Y., & Leung, G. M.
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-07
Volume
382
Issue
9887
Pages
138-145
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2127974353
Cited by
252
References
5
FWCI
32.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Human infection with avian influenza A H7N9 virus: an assessment of clinical severity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0140-6736(13)61207-6
The paper
Yu, H., Cowling, B. J., Feng, L., Lau, E. H., Liao, Q., Tsang, T. K., Peng, Z., Wu, P., Liu, F., Fang, V. J., Zhang, H., Li, M., Zeng, L., Xu, Z., Li, Z., Luo, H., Li, Q., Feng, Z., Cao, B., . . . Leung, G. M. (2013). Human infection with avian influenza A H7N9 virus: an assessment of clinical severity. The Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(13)61207-6

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.