The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Self-harm in prisons in England and Wales: an epidemiological study of prevalence, risk factors, clustering, and subsequent suicide
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Self-harm and suicide are common in prisoners, yet robust information on the full extent and characteristics of people at risk of self-harm is scant. Furthermore, understanding how frequently self-harm is followed by suicide, and in which prisoners this progression is most likely to happen, is important. We did a case-control study of all prisoners in England and Wales to ascertain the prevalence of self-harm in this population, associated risk factors, clustering effects, and risk of subsequent suicide after self-harm. METHODS: Records of self-harm incidents in all prisons in England and Wales were gathered routinely between January, 2004, and December, 2009. We did a case-control comparison of prisoners who self-harmed and those who did not between January, 2006, and December, 2009. We also used a Bayesian approach to look at clustering of people who self-harmed. Prisoners who self-harmed and subsequently died by suicide in prison were compared with other inmates who self-harmed. FINDINGS: 139,195 self-harm incidents were recorded in 26,510 individual prisoners between 2004 and 2009; 5-6% of male prisoners and 20-24% of female inmates self-harmed every year. Self-harm rates were more than ten times higher in female prisoners than in male inmates. Repetition of self-harm was common, particularly in women and teenage girls, in whom a subgroup of 102 prisoners accounted for 17,307 episodes. In both sexes, self-harm was associated with younger age, white ethnic origin, prison type, and a life sentence or being unsentenced; in female inmates, committing a violent offence against an individual was also a factor. Substantial evidence was noted of clustering in time and location of prisoners who self-harmed (adjusted intra-class correlation 0·15, 95% CI 0·11-0·18). 109 subsequent suicides in prison were reported in individuals who self-harmed; the risk was higher in those who self-harmed than in the general prison population, and more than half the deaths occurred within a month of self-harm. Risk factors for suicide after self-harm in male prisoners were older age and a previous self-harm incident of high or moderate lethality; in female inmates, a history of more than five self-harm incidents within a year was associated with subsequent suicide. INTERPRETATION: The burden of self-harm in prisoners is substantial, particularly in women. Self-harm in prison is associated with subsequent suicide in this setting. Prevention and treatment of self-harm in prisoners is an essential component of suicide prevention in prisons. FUNDING: Wellcome Trust, National Institute for Health Research, National Offender Management Service, and Department of Health.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“the annual prevalence of self-harm in prison has been estimated to be 5–6% in men and 20–24% in women,5”
From Risk factors for self-harm in prison: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2020) · cites this paper as [5]
In the citing paper
“Self-harm is a leading cause of morbidity in prisoners”
From Risk factors for self-harm in prison: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2020) · cites this paper as [5]
In the citing paper
“This non-significance contrasts with findings in the general population,74 in which female sex as a risk factor for self-harm is stronger, and one high-quality population study of UK prisoners5 that reported that the odds of self-harm was four times higher in women than in men.”
From Risk factors for self-harm in prison: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2020) · cites this paper as [5]
In the citing paper
“This recommendation is supported by evidence on the clustering of self-harm5 and suicide78 in custody, which suggests that interventions after suicidal behaviour should extend beyond the individual prisoner to others in the same wing or prison who could be at risk.”
From Risk factors for self-harm in prison: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2020) · cites this paper as [5]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Goldstein, H. (2006) · Technometrics · doi:10.1198/tech.2006.s417 · Cited by 4,960
Goldstein, H. (2010) · Wiley series in probability and statistics · doi:10.1002/9780470973394 · Cited by 1,581
Fazel, S., & Baillargeon, J. (2011) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)61053-7 · Cited by 1,080
Self-citationSevere mental illness in 33 588 prisoners worldwide: systematic review and meta-regression analysis
Fazel, S., & Seewald, K. (2012) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.111.096370 · Cited by 985
Self-citationAssesing the effects of context in studies of child and youth development
Duncan, G. J., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1999) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3401_3 · Cited by 408
Runeson, B., Tidemalm, D., Dahlin, M., Lichtenstein, P., & Langstrom, N. (2010) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.c3222 · Cited by 396
National Strategy for Suicide Prevention: Goals and Objectives for Action
Satcher, D. S. (2003) · Cited by 392
Attitudes and knowledge of clinical staff regarding people who self-harm: a systematic review.
Saunders, K. E. A., Hawton, K., Fortune, S., & Farrell, S. (2012) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2011.08.024 · Cited by 376
Self-citationSuicide in Prisoners: A Systematic Review of Risk Factors
Fazel, S., Cartwright, J., Norman-Nott, A., & Hawton, K. (2008) · The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry · doi:10.4088/jcp.v69n1107 · Cited by 368
Self-citationPrison suicide in 12 countries: an ecological study of 861 suicides during 2003–2007
Fazel, S., Grann, M., Kling, B., & Hawton, K. E. (2010) · Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s00127-010-0184-4 · Cited by 334
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mental health of prisoners: prevalence, adverse outcomes, and interventions
Fazel, S., Hayes, A. J., Bartellas, K., Clerici, M., & Trestman, R. (2016) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(16)30142-0 · Cited by 992
Self-citationMcManus, S., Gunnell, D., Cooper, C., Bebbington, P. E., Howard, L. M., Brugha, T., Jenkins, R., Hassiotis, A., Weich, S., & Appleby, L. (2019) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(19)30188-9 · Cited by 415
Suicide in prisons: an international study of prevalence and contributory factors
Fazel, S., Ramesh, T., & Hawton, K. (2017) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(17)30430-3 · Cited by 299
Self-citationRisk factors for self-harm in prison: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Favril, L., Yu, R., Hawton, K., & Fazel, S. (2020) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(20)30190-5 · Cited by 254
Self-citationRisk factors for suicide in prisons: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Zhong, S., Senior, M., Yu, R., Perry, A., Hawton, K. E., Shaw, J. J., & Fazel, S. (2021) · The Lancet Public Health · doi:10.1016/s2468-2667(20)30233-4 · Cited by 263
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hawton, K., Linsell, L., Adeniji, T., Sariaslan, A., & Fazel, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Ministry of Justice (GB)
- Karolinska Institutet (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Fazel, Seena
- Venue
- The Lancet
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-03
- Volume
- 383
- Issue
- 9923
- Pages
- 1147-1154
- ISSN
- 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
- 0140-6736
- PMC
- PMC3978651
- OpenAlex
- W2143818998
- Cited by
- 357
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 12
- FWCI
- 23.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- The Lancet (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Senior Investigator and to SF from the Wellcome Trust (095806)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
- Keywords
- self-harm, suicide, prisoners, prison population, prevalence, risk factors, clustering, women prisoners, incarcerated men, violent offending, life imprisonment, adolescent girls, suicide prevention, England and Wales prisons, prison mental health, prison staff training
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Bayes Theorem, England, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prisoners, Prisons, Risk Factors, Suicide, Wales, Prevalence, Case-Control Studies, Self-Injurious Behavior, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review