Cited by 271Science, Research, and MedicineCancer Genomics and DiagnosticsCancer Cells and Metastasis

Rethinking the war on cancer

Open access
Hanahan, Douglas·2014·The Lancet

Abstract

Some 40 years ago a metaphor was posed that cancer was such an insidious adversary that a declaration of war on the disease was justified. Although this statement was a useful inspiration for enlistment of resources, despite extraordinary progress in our understanding of disease pathogenesis, in most cases and for most forms of cancer this war has not been won. A second metaphor was about magic bullets--targeted therapies based on knowledge of mechanisms that were envisaged to strike with devastating consequences for the disease. The reality, however, is that targeted therapies are generally not curative or even enduringly effective, because of the adaptive and evasive resistance strategies developed by cancers under attack. In this Series paper, I suggest that, much like in modern warfare, the war on cancer needs to have a battlespace vision.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(13)62226-6

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the clinic, the persister state most closely corresponds to minimal residual disease from which relapse can occur if treatment is discontinued or if acquired drug resistance develops in response to continuous therapy.

    “In the clinic, the persister state most closely corresponds to minimal residual disease from which relapse can occur if treatment is discontinued or if acquired drug resistance develops in response to continuous therapy.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hanahan, D.
Affiliations
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
Corresponding author
Hanahan, Douglas
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-02
Volume
383
Issue
9916
Pages
558-563
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2098627399
Cited by
271
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
36.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Science, Research, and Medicine
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Cells and Metastasis
Keywords
war on cancer, cancer, targeted therapy, drug resistance, adaptive resistance, carcinogenesis, cancer treatment strategies
MeSH terms
Antineoplastic Agents, Health Planning, Humans, Neoplasms, Anticarcinogenic Agents, Metaphor, Molecular Targeted Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review