CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 283Treatment of Major DepressionSchizophrenia research and treatmentElectroconvulsive Therapy Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of augmentation pharmacotherapy with aripiprazole for treatment-resistant depression in late life: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Open access
Lenze, Eric J, Mulsant, Benoit H, Blumberger, Daniel M, Karp, Jordan F, Newcomer, John W, Anderson, Stewart J, Dew, Mary Amanda, Butters, Meryl A, Stack, Jacqueline A, Begley, Amy E, Reynolds, Charles F·2015·The Lancet
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(15)00308-6PMC PMC4690746
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Background Treatment-resistant major depression is common and potentially life-threatening in elderly people, in whom little is known about the benefits and risks of augmentation pharmacotherapy. We aimed to assess whether aripiprazole is associated with a higher probability of remission than is placebo.Methods We did a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial at three centres in the USA and Canada to test the efficacy and safety of aripiprazole augmentation for adults aged older than 60 years with treatment-resistant depression (Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS] score of ≥15). Patients who did not achieve remission during a pre-trial with venlafaxine extended-release (150-300 mg/day) were randomly assigned (1:1) to the addition of aripiprazole (target dose 10 mg [maximum 15 mg] daily) daily or placebo for 12 weeks. The computer-generated randomisation was done in blocks and stratified by site. Only the database administrator and research pharmacists had knowledge of treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was remission, defined as an MADRS score of 10 or less (and at least 2 points below the score at the start of the randomised phase) at both of the final two consecutive visits, analysed by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00892047.Findings From July 20, 2009, to Dec 30, 2013, we recruited 468 eligible participants, 181 (39%) of whom did not remit and were randomly assigned to aripiprazole (n=91) or placebo (n=90). A greater proportion of participants in the aripiprazole group achieved remission than did those in the placebo group (40 [44%] vs 26 [29%] participants; odds ratio [OR] 2·0 [95% CI 1·1-3·7], p=0·03; number needed to treat [NNT] 6·6 [95% CI 3·5-81·8]). Akathisia was the most common adverse effect of aripiprazole (reported in 24 [26%] of 91 participants on aripiprazole vs 11 [12%] of 90 on placebo). Compared with placebo, aripiprazole was also associated with more Parkinsonism (15 [17%] of 86 vs two [2%] of 81 participants), but not with treatment-emergent suicidal ideation (13 [21%] of 61 vs 19 [29%] of 65 participants) or other measured safety variables.Interpretation In adults aged 60 years or older who do not achieve remission from depression with a first-line antidepressant, the addition of aripiprazole is effective in achieving and sustaining remission. Tolerability concerns include the potential for akathisia and Parkinsonism.Funding National Institute of Mental Health, UPMC Endowment in Geriatric Psychiatry, Taylor Family Institute for Innovative Psychiatric Research, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, and the Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(15)00308-6

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 60 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 283

Related

Metadata

Authors
Lenze, E. J., Mulsant, B. H., Blumberger, D. M., Karp, J. F., Newcomer, J. W., Anderson, S. J., Dew, M. A., Butters, M. A., Stack, J. A., Begley, A. E., & Reynolds, C. F.
Affiliations
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Florida Atlantic University (US)
Corresponding author
Lenze, Eric J
ORCID
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-12
Volume
386
Issue
10011
Pages
2404-2412
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
DOI
10.1016/s0140-6736(15)00308-6
PMC
PMC4690746
OpenAlex
W1780931260
Cited by
283
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 6
FWCI
16.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (P30 MH90333, R01 MH083660)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
  • Roche
  • Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
  • Brain and Behavior Research Foundation
  • National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health
  • American Foundation for Suicide Prevention
  • Centre for Addiction and Mental Health Foundation
  • National Center on Minority Health and Health Disparities
  • National Institutes of Health
  • H. Lundbeck A/S
  • National Palliative Care Research Center
  • Fondation Brain Canada
  • John A. Hartford Foundation
  • Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
  • National Institute on Aging
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
Keywords
treatment-resistant depression, geriatric depression, elderly patients, antidepressant augmentation, venlafaxine, akathisia, antipsychotic adverse effects, remission, tolerability, number needed to treat, number needed to harm, adverse drug reactions, anticholinergic effects
MeSH terms
Aripiprazole, Aged, Antidepressive Agents, Double-Blind Method, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Parkinson Disease, Secondary, Recurrence, Treatment Outcome, Akathisia, Drug-Induced, Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review