Cited by 387Infant Nutrition and HealthProbiotics and Fermented FoodsNeonatal and Maternal Infections

Bifidobacterium breve BBG-001 in very preterm infants: a randomised controlled phase 3 trial

Open access
Costeloe, Kate, Hardy, Pollyanna, Juszczak, Edmund, Wilks, Mark, Millar, Michael R·2016·The Lancet

Abstract

Background Probiotics may reduce necrotising enterocolitis and late-onset sepsis after preterm birth. However, there has been concern about the rigour and generalisability of some trials and there is no agreement about whether or not they should be used routinely. We aimed to test the effectiveness of the probiotic Bifidobacterium breve BBG-001 to reduce necrotising enterocolitis, late-onset sepsis, and death in preterm infants.Methods In this multicentre, randomised controlled phase 3 study (the PiPS trial), we recruited infants born between 23 and 30 weeks' gestational age within 48 h of birth from 24 hospitals in southeast England. Infants were randomly assigned (1:1) to probiotic or placebo via a minimisation algorithm randomisation programme. The probiotic intervention was B breve BBG-001 suspended in dilute elemental infant formula given enterally in a daily dose of 8·2 to 9·2 log10 CFU; the placebo was dilute infant formula alone. Clinicians and families were masked to allocation. The primary outcomes were necrotising enterocolitis (Bell stage 2 or 3), blood culture positive sepsis more than 72 h after birth; and death before discharge from hospital. All primary analyses were by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ISRCTN, number 05511098 and EudraCT, number 2006-003445-17.Findings Between July 1, 2010, and July 31, 2013, 1315 infants were recruited; of whom 654 were allocated to probiotic and 661 to placebo. Five infants had consent withdrawn after randomisation, thus 650 were analysed in the probiotic group and 660 in the placebo group. Rates of the primary outcomes did not differ significantly between the probiotic and placebo groups. 61 infants (9%) in the probiotic group had necrotising enterocolitis compared with 66 (10%) in the placebo group (adjusted risk ratio 0·93 (95% CI 0·68-1·27); 73 (11%) infants in the probiotics group had sepsis compared with 77 (12%) in the placebo group (0·97 (0·73-1·29); and 54 (8%) deaths occurred before discharge home in the probiotic group compared with 56 (9%) in the placebo group (0·93 [0·67-1·30]). No probiotic-associated adverse events were reported.Interpretation There is no evidence of benefit for this intervention in this population; this result does not support the routine use of B breve BBG-001 for prevention of necrotising enterocolitis and late-onset sepis in very preterm infants.Funding UK National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(15)01027-2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A phase 3 clinical trial of B. breve BBG-001 found no evidence of benefit for very preterm infants.

    “For instance, a phase 3 clinical trial aimed at testing the effectiveness of the probiotic B. breve BBG-001 concluded that there is no evidence of benefit for very preterm infants (149).”

    From Bifidobacteria and Their Health-Promoting Effects (2017) · cites this paper as [149]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 34 · Cited by 387

Authors
Costeloe, K., Hardy, P., Juszczak, E., Wilks, M., & Millar, M. R.
Affiliations
  • Queen Mary University of London (GB)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Barts Health NHS Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Costeloe, Kate
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-02
Volume
387
Issue
10019
Pages
649-660
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2174358501
Cited by
387
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 3
FWCI
42.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Yakult Honsha
  • Health Technology Assessment Programme (05/501/04)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Neonatal and Maternal Infections
Keywords
probiotics, very preterm infants, necrotizing enterocolitis, late-onset sepsis, neonatal mortality, gastrointestinal infections, neonatal gut microbiota, probiotic safety, neonatal intensive care
MeSH terms
Adult, Bifidobacterium, Birth Weight, Double-Blind Method, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Gestational Age, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Premature, Infant, Premature, Diseases, Male, Maternal Age, Treatment Outcome, Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections, Sepsis, Probiotics, Enterocolitis, Necrotizing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review