Cited by 83Smoking Behavior and CessationGlobal Public Health Policies and EpidemiologyPublic Health Policies and Education

A tobacco-free world: a call to action to phase out the sale of tobacco products by 2040

Beaglehole, Robert, Bonita, Ruth, Yach, Derek, Mackay, Judith, Reddy, K Srinath·2015·The Lancet

Abstract

The time has come for the world to acknowledge the unacceptability of the damage being done by the tobacco industry and work towards a world essentially free from the sale (legal and illegal) of tobacco products. A tobacco-free world by 2040, where less than 5% of the world's adult population use tobacco, is socially desirable, technically feasible, and could become politically practical. Three possible ways forward exist: so-called business-as-usual, with most countries steadily implementing the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) provisions; accelerated implementation of the FCTC by all countries; and a so-called turbo-charged approach that complements FCTC actions with strengthened UN leadership, full engagement of all sectors, and increased investment in tobacco control. Only the turbo-charged approach will achieve a tobacco-free world by 2040 where tobacco is out of sight, out of mind, and out of fashion--yet not prohibited. The first and most urgent priority is the inclusion of an ambitious tobacco target in the post-2015 sustainable development health goal. The second priority is accelerated implementation of the FCTC policies in all countries, with full engagement from all sectors including the private sector--from workplaces to pharmacies--and with increased national and global investment. The third priority is an amendment of the FCTC to include an ambitious global tobacco reduction goal. The fourth priority is a UN high-level meeting on tobacco use t…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(15)60133-7

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beaglehole, R., Bonita, R., Yach, D., Mackay, J., & Reddy, K. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Auckland (NZ)
  • Vitality Institute (US)
  • Public Health Foundation of India (IN)
Corresponding author
Beaglehole, Robert
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-03
Volume
385
Issue
9972
Pages
1011-1018
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2137254462
Cited by
83
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 10
FWCI
1.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Public Health Policies and Education
Keywords
tobacco control, Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, tobacco industry, private sector participation
MeSH terms
Smoking Prevention, Commerce, Government Programs, Health Policy, Health Promotion, Humans, Smoking, Tobacco, Smokeless, Global Health, Tobacco Industry, Tobacco Use Cessation, Tobacco Products, Tobacco Use, Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review