The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clinical workload in UK primary care: a retrospective analysis of 100 million consultations in England, 2007–14
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Primary care is the main source of health care in many health systems, including the UK National Health Service (NHS), but few objective data exist for the volume and nature of primary care activity. With rising concerns that NHS primary care workload has increased substantially, we aimed to assess the direct clinical workload of general practitioners (GPs) and practice nurses in primary care in the UK. METHODS: We did a retrospective analysis of GP and nurse consultations of non-temporary patients registered at 398 English general practices between April, 2007, and March, 2014. We used data from electronic health records routinely entered in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink, and linked CPRD data to national datasets. Trends in age-standardised and sex-standardised consultation rates were modelled with joinpoint regression analysis. FINDINGS: The dataset comprised 101,818,352 consultations and 20,626,297 person-years of observation. The crude annual consultation rate per person increased by 10·51%, from 4·67 in 2007-08, to 5·16 in 2013-14. Consultation rates were highest in infants (age 0-4 years) and elderly people (≥85 years), and were higher for female patients than for male patients of all ages. The greatest increases in age-standardised and sex-standardised rates were in GPs, with a rise of 12·36% per 10,000 person-years, compared with 0·9% for practice nurses. GP telephone consultation rates doubled, compared with a 5·20% rise in surgery consultations, which accounted for 90% of all consultations. The mean duration of GP surgery consultations increased by 6·7%, from 8·65 min (95% CI 8·64-8·65) to 9·22 min (9·22-9·23), and overall workload increased by 16%. INTERPRETATION: Our findings show a substantial increase in practice consultation rates, average consultation duration, and total patient-facing clinical workload in English general practice. These results suggest that English primary care as currently delivered could be reaching saturation point. Notably, our data only explore direct clinical workload and not indirect activities and professional duties, which have probably also increased. This and additional research questions, including the outcomes of workload changes on other sectors of health care, need urgent answers for primary care provision internationally. FUNDING: Department of Health Policy Research Programme.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Data Resource Profile: Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD)
Herrett, E., Gallagher, A. M., Bhaskaran, K., Forbes, H., Mathur, R., van Staa, T., & Smeeth, L. (2015) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyv098 · Cited by 2,667
Completeness and usability of ethnicity data in UK-based primary care and hospital databases
Mathur, R., Bhaskaran, K., Chaturvedi, N., Leon, D. A., vanStaa, T., Grundy, E., & Smeeth, L. (2014) · Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdt116 · Cited by 462
Williams, T., van Staa, T., Puri, S., & Eaton, S. (2012) · Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety · doi:10.1177/2042098611435911 · Cited by 282
Campbell, J. L., Fletcher, E., Britten, N., Green, C., Holt, T. A., Lattimer, V., Richards, D. A., Richards, S. H., Salisbury, C., Calitri, R., et al. (2014) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(14)61058-8 · Cited by 236
Self-citationLost to the NHS: a mixed methods study of why GPs leave practice early in England
Doran, N., Fox, F. E., Rodham, K., Taylor, G. T., & Harris, M. (2016) · British Journal of General Practice · doi:10.3399/bjgp16x683425 · Cited by 139
Holt, T., Fletcher, E., Warren, F. C., Richards, S. H., Salisbury, C., Calitri, R., Green, C., Taylor, R. S., Richards, D. A., Varley, A., et al. (2016) · British Journal of General Practice · doi:10.3399/bjgp16x684001 · Cited by 42
Self-citation
Cited by
Irving, G., Neves, A. L., Dambha-Miller, H., Oishi, A., Tagashira, H., Verho, A., & Holden, J. (2017) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017902 · Cited by 1,083
Functional neurological disorder: new subtypes and shared mechanisms
Hallett, M., Aybek, S., Dworetzky, B. A., McWhirter, L., Staab, J. P., & Stone, J. (2022) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(21)00422-1 · Cited by 538
The epidemiology of multimorbidity in primary care: a retrospective cohort study
Cassell, A., Edwards, D., Harshfield, A., Rhodes, K., Brimicombe, J., Payne, R., & Griffin, S. (2018) · British Journal of General Practice · doi:10.3399/bjgp18x695465 · Cited by 528
(2018) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 409
Joy, M., McGagh, D., Jones, N., Liyanage, H., Sherlock, J., Parimalanathan, V., Akinyemi, O., van Vlymen, J., Howsam, G., Marshall, M., et al. (2020) · British Journal of General Practice · doi:10.3399/bjgp20x710933 · Cited by 178
Metadata
- Authors
- Hobbs, F. D. R., Bankhead, C., Mukhtar, T., Stevens, S., Perera-Salazar, R., Holt, T., & Salisbury, C.
- Venue
- The Lancet
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-06
- Volume
- 387
- Issue
- 10035
- Pages
- 2323-2330
- ISSN
- 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
- 0140-6736
- OpenAlex
- W2312931650
- Cited by
- 601
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 128.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical workload in UK primary care: a retrospective analysis of 100 million consultations in England, 2007–14. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0140-6736(16)00620-6
- The paper
- Hobbs, F. D. R., Bankhead, C., Mukhtar, T., Stevens, S., Perera-Salazar, R., Holt, T., & Salisbury, C. (2016). Clinical workload in UK primary care: a retrospective analysis of 100 million consultations in England, 2007–14. The Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(16)00620-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.