The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Recent advances in the utility and use of the General Practice Research Database as an example of a UK Primary Care Data resource
Open accessAbstract
Since its inception in the mid-1980s, the General Practice Research Database (GPRD) has undergone many changes but remains the largest validated and most utilised primary care database in the UK. Its use in pharmacoepidemiology stretches back many years with now over 800 original research papers. Administered by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency since 2001, the last 5 years have seen a rebuild of the database processing system enhancing access to the data, and a concomitant push towards broadening the applications of the database. New methodologies including real-world harm–benefit assessment, pharmacogenetic studies and pragmatic randomised controlled trials within the database are being implemented. A substantive and unique linkage program (using a trusted third party) has enabled access to secondary care data and disease-specific registry data as well as socio-economic data and death registration data. The utility of anonymised free text accessed in a safe and appropriate manner is being explored using simple and more complex techniques such as natural language processing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Validation and validity of diagnoses in the General Practice Research Database: a systematic review
Herrett, E., Thomas, S. L., Schoonen, W. M., Smeeth, L., & Hall, A. J. (2010) · British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2125.2009.03537.x · Cited by 1,109
Cited by
Data Resource Profile: Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD)
Herrett, E., Gallagher, A. M., Bhaskaran, K., Forbes, H., Mathur, R., van Staa, T., & Smeeth, L. (2015) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyv098 · Cited by 2,667
Hobbs, F. D. R., Bankhead, C., Mukhtar, T., Stevens, S., Perera-Salazar, R., Holt, T., & Salisbury, C. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)00620-6 · Cited by 601
Completeness and usability of ethnicity data in UK-based primary care and hospital databases
Mathur, R., Bhaskaran, K., Chaturvedi, N., Leon, D. A., vanStaa, T., Grundy, E., & Smeeth, L. (2014) · Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdt116 · Cited by 462
Self-citationFildes, A., Charlton, J., Rudisill, C., Littlejohns, P., Prevost, A. T., & Gulliford, M. C. (2015) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2015.302773 · Cited by 394
Existing Data Sources in Clinical Epidemiology: Laboratory Information System Databases in Denmark
Arendt, J. F. H., Hansen, A. T., Ladefoged, S. A., Sørensen, H. T., Pedersen, L., & Adelborg, K. (2020) · Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.2147/clep.s245060 · Cited by 292
Metadata
- Authors
- Williams, T., van Staa, T., Puri, S., & Eaton, S.
- Venue
- Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2012-02-02
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 89-99
- ISSN
- 2042-0986 (ISSN-L)
- 2042-0994
- OpenAlex
- W2164785151
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 44.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recent advances in the utility and use of the General Practice Research Database as an example of a UK Primary Care Data resource. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/2042098611435911
- The paper
- Williams, T., van Staa, T., Puri, S., & Eaton, S. (2012). Recent advances in the utility and use of the General Practice Research Database as an example of a UK Primary Care Data resource. Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042098611435911
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.