Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 865

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Use of quantitative molecular diagnostic methods to identify causes of diarrhoea in children: a reanalysis of the GEMS case-control study

Open access
Liu, Jie, Platts-Mills, James A, Juma, Jane, Kabir, Furqan, Nkeze, Joseph, Okoi, Catherine, Operario, Darwin J, Uddin, Jashim, Ahmed, Shahnawaz, Alonso, Pedro L, Antonio, Martin, Becker, Stephen M, Blackwelder, William C, Breiman, Robert F, Faruque, Abu S G, Fields, Barry, Gratz, Jean, Haque, Rashidul, Hossain, Anowar, Hossain, M Jahangir, Jarju, Sheikh, Qamar, Farah, Iqbal, Najeeha Talat, Kwambana, Brenda, Mandomando, Inacio, McMurry, Timothy L, Ochieng, Caroline, Ochieng, John B, Ochieng, Melvin, Onyango, Clayton, Panchalingam, Sandra, Kalam, Adil, Aziz, Fatima, Qureshi, Shahida, Ramamurthy, Thandavarayan, Roberts, James H, Saha, Debasish, Sow, Samba O, Stroup, Suzanne E, Sur, Dipika, Tamboura, Boubou, Taniuchi, Mami, Tennant, Sharon M, Toema, Deanna, Wu, Yukun, Zaidi, Anita, Nataro, James P, Kotloff, Karen L, Levine, Myron M, Houpt, Eric R·2016·The Lancet

Abstract

Summary Background Diarrhoea is the second leading cause of mortality in children worldwide, but establishing the cause can be complicated by diverse diagnostic approaches and varying test characteristics. We used quantitative molecular diagnostic methods to reassess causes of diarrhoea in the Global Enteric Multicenter Study (GEMS). Methods GEMS was a study of moderate to severe diarrhoea in children younger than 5 years in Africa and Asia. We used quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) to test for 32 enteropathogens in stool samples from cases and matched asymptomatic controls from GEMS, and compared pathogen-specific attributable incidences with those found with the original GEMS microbiological methods, including culture, EIA, and reverse-transcriptase PCR. We calculated revised pathogen-specific burdens of disease and assessed causes in individual children. Findings We analysed 5304 sample pairs. For most pathogens, incidence was greater with qPCR than with the original methods, particularly for adenovirus 40/41 (around five times), Shigella spp or enteroinvasive Escherichia coli (EIEC) and Campylobactor jejuni or C coli (around two times), and heat-stable enterotoxin-producing E coli ([ST-ETEC] around 1·5 times). The six most attributable pathogens became, in descending order, Shigella spp, rotavirus, adenovirus 40/41, ST-ETEC, Cryptosporidium spp, and Campylobacter spp. Pathogen-attributable diarrhoeal burden was 89·3% (95% CI 83·2–96·0) at the population level, compared with 51·5% (48·0–55·0) in the original GEMS analysis. The top six pathogens accounted for 77·8% (74·6–80·9) of all attributable diarrhoea. With use of model-derived quantitative cutoffs to assess individual diarrhoeal cases, 2254 (42·5%) of 5304 cases had one diarrhoea-associated pathogen detected and 2063 (38·9%) had two or more, with Shigella spp and rotavirus being the pathogens most strongly associated with diarrhoea in children with mixed infections. Interpretation A quantitative molecular diagnostic approach improved population-level and case-level characterisation of the causes of diarrhoea and indicated a high burden of disease associated with six pathogens, for which targeted treatment should be prioritised. Funding Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(16)31529-x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 865

Metadata

Authors
Liu, J., Platts-Mills, J. A., Juma, J., Kabir, F., Nkeze, J., Okoi, C., Operario, D. J., Uddin, J., Ahmed, S., Alonso, P. L., Antonio, M., Becker, S. M., Blackwelder, W. C., Breiman, R. F., Faruque, A. S. G., Fields, B., Gratz, J., Haque, R., Hossain, A., Hossain, M. J., Jarju, S., Qamar, F., Iqbal, N. T., Kwambana, B., Mandomando, I., McMurry, T. L., Ochieng, C., Ochieng, J. B., Ochieng, M., Onyango, C., Panchalingam, S., Kalam, A., Aziz, F., Qureshi, S., Ramamurthy, T., Roberts, J. H., Saha, D., Sow, S. O., Stroup, S. E., Sur, D., Tamboura, B., Taniuchi, M., Tennant, S. M., Toema, D., Wu, Y., Zaidi, A., Nataro, J. P., Kotloff, K. L., Levine, M. M., & Houpt, E. R.
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-09
Volume
388
Issue
10051
Pages
1291-1301
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2521607002
Cited by
865
References
2
FWCI
73.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Use of quantitative molecular diagnostic methods to identify causes of diarrhoea in children: a reanalysis of the GEMS case-control study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0140-6736(16)31529-x
The paper
Liu, J., Platts-Mills, J. A., Juma, J., Kabir, F., Nkeze, J., Okoi, C., Operario, D. J., Uddin, J., Ahmed, S., Alonso, P. L., Antonio, M., Becker, S. M., Blackwelder, W. C., Breiman, R. F., Faruque, A. S. G., Fields, B., Gratz, J., Haque, R., Hossain, A., . . . Houpt, E. R. (2016). Use of quantitative molecular diagnostic methods to identify causes of diarrhoea in children: a reanalysis of the GEMS case-control study. The Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(16)31529-x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.