Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 357

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Enhanced terminal room disinfection and acquisition and infection caused by multidrug-resistant organisms and Clostridium difficile (the Benefits of Enhanced Terminal Room Disinfection study): a cluster-randomised, multicentre, crossover study

Open access
Anderson, Deverick J, Chen, Luke F, Weber, David J, Moehring, Rebekah W, Lewis, Sarah S, Triplett, Patricia F, Blocker, Michael, Becherer, Paul, Schwab, J Conrad, Knelson, Lauren P, Lokhnygina, Yuliya, Rutala, William A, Kanamori, Hajime, Gergen, Maria F, Sexton, Daniel J·2017·The Lancet

Abstract

Summary Background Patients admitted to hospital can acquire multidrug-resistant organisms and Clostridium difficile from inadequately disinfected environmental surfaces. We determined the effect of three enhanced strategies for terminal room disinfection (disinfection of a room between occupying patients) on acquisition and infection due to meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin-resistant enterococci, C difficile, and multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter. Methods We did a pragmatic, cluster-randomised, crossover trial at nine hospitals in the southeastern USA. Rooms from which a patient with infection or colonisation with a target organism was discharged were terminally disinfected with one of four strategies: reference (quaternary ammonium disinfectant except for C difficile, for which bleach was used); UV (quaternary ammonium disinfectant and disinfecting ultraviolet [UV-C] light except for C difficile, for which bleach and UV-C were used); bleach; and bleach and UV-C. The next patient admitted to the targeted room was considered exposed. Every strategy was used at each hospital in four consecutive 7-month periods. We randomly assigned the sequence of strategies for each hospital (1:1:1:1). The primary outcomes were the incidence of infection or colonisation with all target organisms among exposed patients and the incidence of C difficile infection among exposed patients in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01579370. Findings 31 226 patients were exposed; 21 395 (69%) met all inclusion criteria, including 4916 in the reference group, 5178 in the UV group, 5438 in the bleach group, and 5863 in the bleach and UV group. 115 patients had the primary outcome during 22 426 exposure days in the reference group (51·3 per 10 000 exposure days). The incidence of target organisms among exposed patients was significantly lower after adding UV to standard cleaning strategies (n=76; 33·9 cases per 10 000 exposure days; relative risk [RR] 0·70, 95% CI 0·50–0·98; p=0·036). The primary outcome was not statistically lower with bleach (n=101; 41·6 cases per 10 000 exposure days; RR 0·85, 95% CI 0·69–1·04; p=0·116), or bleach and UV (n=131; 45·6 cases per 10 000 exposure days; RR 0·91, 95% CI 0·76–1·09; p=0·303) among exposed patients. Similarly, the incidence of C difficile infection among exposed patients was not changed after adding UV to cleaning with bleach (n=38 vs 36; 30·4 cases vs 31·6 cases per 10 000 exposure days; RR 1·0, 95% CI 0·57–1·75; p=0·997). Interpretation A contaminated health-care environment is an important source for acquisition of pathogens; enhanced terminal room disinfection decreases this risk. Funding US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(16)31588-4

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Dancer, 2008, Importance of the environment in meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus acquisition: the case for hospital cleaning, Lancet Infect Dis, 8, 101, 10.1016/S1473-3099(07)70241-4 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Kramer, 2006, How long do nosocomial pathogens persist on inanimate surfaces? A systematic review, BMC Infect Dis, 6, 130, 10.1186/1471-2334-6-130 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Carling, 2008, Improving cleaning of the environment surrounding patients in 36 acute care hospitals, Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol, 29, 1035, 10.1086/591940 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Mitchell, 2015, Risk of organism acquisition from prior room occupants: a systematic review and meta-analysis, J Hosp Infect, 91, 211, 10.1016/j.jhin.2015.08.005 · DOI
  5. Guerrero, 2012, Acquisition of spores on gloved hands after contact with the skin of patients with Clostridium difficile infection and with environmental surfaces in their rooms, Am J Infect Control, 40, 556, 10.1016/j.ajic.2011.08.002 · DOI
  6. Hayden, 2008, Risk of hand or glove contamination after contact with patients colonized with vancomycin-resistant enterococcus or the colonized patients' environment, Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol, 29, 149, 10.1086/524331 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Stiefel, 2011, Contamination of hands with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus after contact with environmental surfaces and after contact with the skin of colonized patients, Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol, 32, 185, 10.1086/657944 · DOI
  8. Han, 2015, Cleaning hospital room surfaces to prevent health care-associated infections: a technical brief, Ann Intern Med, 163, 598, 10.7326/M15-1192 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Anderson, 2013, Decontamination of targeted pathogens from patient rooms using an automated ultraviolet-C-emitting device, Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol, 34, 466, 10.1086/670215 · DOI
  10. Bonten, 1998, The role of “colonization pressure” in the spread of vancomycin-resistant enterococci: an important infection control variable, JAMA Intern Med, 158, 1127, 10.1001/archinte.158.10.1127 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Huang, 2007, Improving methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus surveillance and reporting in intensive care units, J Infect Dis, 195, 330, 10.1086/510622 · DOI
  12. Avery, 2012, Inclusion of 30-day postdischarge detection triples the incidence of hospital-onset methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol, 33, 114, 10.1086/663714 · DOI
  13. McDonald, 2007, Recommendations for surveillance of Clostridium difficile-associated disease, Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol, 28, 140, 10.1086/511798 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Eckstein, 2007, Reduction of Clostridium difficile and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus contamination of environmental surfaces after an intervention to improve cleaning methods, BMC Infect Dis, 7, 61, 10.1186/1471-2334-7-61 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Datta, 2011, Environmental cleaning intervention and risk of acquiring multidrug-resistant organisms from prior room occupants, JAMA Intern Med, 171, 491, 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.64 · DOI
  16. Hayden, 2006, Reduction in acquisition of vancomycin-resistant enterococcus after enforcement of routine environmental cleaning measures, Clin Infect Dis, 42, 1552, 10.1086/503845 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Smith, 2011, Assessing the efficacy of different microfibre cloths at removing surface micro-organisms associated with healthcare-associated infections, J Hosp Infect, 78, 182, 10.1016/j.jhin.2011.02.015 · DOI
  18. Passaretti, 2013, An evaluation of environmental decontamination with hydrogen peroxide vapor for reducing the risk of patient acquisition of multidrug-resistant organisms, Clin Infect Dis, 56, 27, 10.1093/cid/cis839 · DOI
  19. Haas, 2014, Implementation and impact of ultraviolet environmental disinfection in an acute care setting, Am J Infect Control, 42, 586, 10.1016/j.ajic.2013.12.013 · DOI
  20. Levin, 2013, The effect of portable pulsed xenon ultraviolet light after terminal cleaning on hospital-associated Clostridium difficile infection in a community hospital, Am J Infect Control, 41, 746, 10.1016/j.ajic.2013.02.010 · DOI
  21. Miller, 2015, Utilization and impact of a pulsed-xenon ultraviolet room disinfection system and multidisciplinary care team on Clostridium difficile in a long-term acute care facility, Am J Infect Control, 43, 1350, 10.1016/j.ajic.2015.07.029 · DOI
  22. Nagaraja, 2015, Clostridium difficile infections before and during use of ultraviolet disinfection, Am J Infect Control, 3, 940, 10.1016/j.ajic.2015.05.003 · DOI
  23. Boyce, 2011, Terminal decontamination of patient rooms using an automated mobile UV light unit, Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol, 32, 737, 10.1086/661222 · DOI
  24. Walker, 2012, Characterisation of Clostridium difficile hospital ward-based transmission using extensive epidemiological data and molecular typing, PLoS Med, 9, e1001172, 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001172 · DOI
  25. Eyre, 2013, Diverse sources of C. difficile infection identified on whole-genome sequencing, N Engl J Med, 369, 1195, 10.1056/NEJMoa1216064 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Grabsch, 2012, Significant reduction in vancomycin-resistant enterococcus colonization and bacteraemia after introduction of a bleach-based cleaning-disinfection programme, J Hosp Infect, 82, 234, 10.1016/j.jhin.2012.08.010 · DOI

Cited by

See all 357

Metadata

Authors
Anderson, D. J., Chen, L. F., Weber, D. J., Moehring, R. W., Lewis, S. S., Triplett, P. F., Blocker, M., Becherer, P., Schwab, J. C., Knelson, L. P., Lokhnygina, Y., Rutala, W. A., Kanamori, H., Gergen, M. F., & Sexton, D. J.
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-02
Volume
389
Issue
10071
Pages
805-814
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2576430068
Cited by
357
References
3
FWCI
28.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Funders
  • CDC Prevention Epicenters Program (U54CK000164, to DJS)
  • NIH/NIAID (K23AI095357, to DJA)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, NIH (UL1TR001111)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Enhanced terminal room disinfection and acquisition and infection caused by multidrug-resistant organisms and Clostridium difficile (the Benefits of Enhanced Terminal Room Disinfection study): a cluster-randomised, multicentre, crossover study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0140-6736(16)31588-4
The paper
Anderson, D. J., Chen, L. F., Weber, D. J., Moehring, R. W., Lewis, S. S., Triplett, P. F., Blocker, M., Becherer, P., Schwab, J. C., Knelson, L. P., Lokhnygina, Y., Rutala, W. A., Kanamori, H., Gergen, M. F., & Sexton, D. J. (2017). Enhanced terminal room disinfection and acquisition and infection caused by multidrug-resistant organisms and Clostridium difficile (the Benefits of Enhanced Terminal Room Disinfection study): a cluster-randomised, multicentre, crossover study. The Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(16)31588-4

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.