Cited by 837Aging, Health, and DisabilityFrailty in Older AdultsAging and Gerontology Research

Survival, disabilities in activities of daily living, and physical and cognitive functioning among the oldest-old in China: a cohort study

Open access
Zeng, Yi, Feng, Qiushi, Hesketh, Therese, Christensen, Kaare, Vaupel, James W·2017·The Lancet

Abstract

Background The oldest-old (those aged ≥80 years) are the most rapidly growing age group globally, and are most in need of health care and assistance. We aimed to assess changes in mortality, disability in activities of daily living, and physical and cognitive functioning among oldest-old individuals between 1998 and 2008.Methods We used data from the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Study. Three pairs of cohorts aged 80-89 years, 90-99 years, and 100-105 years (in total, 19 528 oldest-old participants) were examined; the two cohorts in each pair were born 10 years apart, with the same age at the time of the assessment in the 1998 and 2008 surveys. Four health outcomes were investigated: annual death rate, Activities of Daily Living (ADL), physical performance in three tests and cognitive function measured by Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). We used different tests and multivariate regression analyses to examine the cohort differences.Findings Controlling for various confounding factors, we noted that annual mortality among oldest-old individuals was substantially reduced between 0·2% and 1·3% in 1998-2008 compared with individuals of the same age born 10 years previously, and that disability according to activities of daily living had significantly reduced annually between 0·8% and 2·8%. However, cognitive impairment in the later cohorts increased annually between 0·7% and 2·2% and objective physical performance capacity (standing up from a chair, picking up a book from the floor, and turning around 360°) decreased anually between 0·4% and 3·8%. We also noted that female mortality was substantially lower than male mortality among the oldest-old, but that women's functional capacities in activities of daily living, cognition, and physical performance were worse than their male counterparts.Interpretation Advances in medications, lifestyle, and socioeconomics might compress activities of daily living disability, that is, benefits of success, but lifespan extension might expand disability of physical and cognitive functioning as more frail, elderly individuals survive with health problems, that is, costs of success.Funding National Natural Science Foundation of China, National Institute on Aging/National Institutes of Health, United Nations Funds for Population Activities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(17)30548-2

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a Chinese longevity study of the oldest old, compression of activities of daily living disability occurred, but life-span extension was associated with expansion of physical and cognitive disability because more frail elderly survived health problems.

    “In this study, there was compression of activities of daily living disability, but life-span extension was associated with expansion of disability of physical and cognitive functioning because there were more frail elderly who survived health problems.175”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zeng, Y., Feng, Q., Hesketh, T., Christensen, K., & Vaupel, J. W.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
  • University College London (GB)
  • University of Southern Denmark (DK)
  • Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research (DE)
Corresponding author
Zeng, Yi
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-04
Volume
389
Issue
10079
Pages
1619-1629
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2592677865
Cited by
837
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 77 · 2025: 142 · 2024: 143 · 2023: 125 · 2022: 110 · 2021: 91 · 2020: 68 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 1
FWCI
37.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • DukeSpace (Duke University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (71110107025, 71233001, 71490732)
  • National Institute on Aging/National Institutes of Health (R01AG023627-10; 2P01AG031719)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
oldest old, mortality trends, activities of daily living disability, physical performance, cognitive function, cognitive impairment, sex differences in aging, cohort differences, lifespan extension, Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey, China
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Age Factors, Aged, 80 and over, China, Cognition, Female, Humans, Longevity, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Psychomotor Performance, Surveys and Questionnaires, Cohort Studies, Exercise, Geriatric Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review