Virtue in deficit: the 9-year-old hero
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Virtues should be understood as shared but relative to the individual rather than the species.
“This allows us to understand virtues as shared but importantly relative to the individual rather than the species.”
From Neurodiversity, epistemic injustice, and the good human life (2022) · cites this paper as Carel, 2017
Attempts to thrive by autistic individuals will be misled by neurotypical signposts, such as those focusing on high cognitive and reflective achievement or other species-specific characteristics like having a family, gaining societal recognition, or accessing mainstream culture.
“it also means that attempts to thrive by autistic individuals will be misled by neurotypical signposts, for example, those focusing on high cognitive and reflective achievement (e.g., Aristotle; cf.Carel, 2017) or other species-specific characteristics, such as having a family, gaining societal recognition, or accessing mainstream culture.”
From Neurodiversity, epistemic injustice, and the good human life (2022) · cites this paper as Carel, 2017
Carel (2017) has stressed the need to relativize our understanding of the virtues in light of individual cognitive limitations.
“Carel (2017), who in discussion of the neurodevelopmental disorder fetal alcohol spectrum disorder has stressed the need to relativize our understanding of the virtues in light of individual cognitive limitations.”
From Neurodiversity, epistemic injustice, and the good human life (2022) · cites this paper as Carel, 2017
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Neurodiversity, epistemic injustice, and the good human life
Chapman, R., & Carel, H. (2022) · Journal of Social Philosophy · doi:10.1111/josp.12456 · Cited by 231 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Carel, H.
- Affiliations
- University of Bristol (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Carel, Havi
- ORCID
- Carel, Havi
- Venue
- The Lancet
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-03
- Volume
- 389
- Issue
- 10074
- Pages
- 1094-1095
- ISSN
- 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
- 0140-6736
- OpenAlex
- W2596761968
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 1.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- Locations
- The Lancet (publishedVersion)
- Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Explore Bristol Research (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Keywords
- fetal alcohol spectrum disorders, prenatal alcohol exposure, childhood adversity, impulsive behavior, virtue, child welfare, child protection, maternal alcohol use
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
