Cited by 1,226Neonatal and Maternal InfectionsSepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentMaternal and Neonatal Healthcare

Neonatal sepsis

Shane, Andi L, Sánchez, Pablo J, Stoll, Barbara J·2017·The Lancet

Abstract

Neonatal sepsis is the cause of substantial morbidity and mortality. Precise estimates of neonatal sepsis burden vary by setting. Differing estimates of disease burden have been reported from high-income countries compared with reports from low-income and middle-income countries. The clinical manifestations range from subclinical infection to severe manifestations of focal or systemic disease. The source of the pathogen might be attributed to an in-utero infection, acquisition from maternal flora, or postnatal acquisition from the hospital or community. The timing of exposure, inoculum size, immune status of the infant, and virulence of the causative agent influence the clinical expression of neonatal sepsis. Immunological immaturity of the neonate might result in an impaired response to infectious agents. This is especially evident in premature infants whose prolonged stays in hospital and need for invasive procedures place them at increased risk for hospital-acquired infections. Clinically, there is often little difference between sepsis that is caused by an identified pathogen and sepsis that is caused by an unknown pathogen. Culture-independent diagnostics, the use of sepsis prediction scores, judicious antimicrobial use, and the development of preventive measures including maternal vaccines are ongoing efforts designed to reduce the burden of neonatal sepsis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(17)31002-4

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shane, A. L., Sánchez, P. J., & Stoll, B. J.
Affiliations
  • Emory University (US)
  • Nationwide Children's Hospital (US)
  • The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
Corresponding author
Shane, Andi L
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-10
Volume
390
Issue
10104
Pages
1770-1780
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W4255232901
Cited by
1,226
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 160 · 2025: 151 · 2024: 183 · 2023: 180 · 2022: 154 · 2021: 170 · 2020: 109 · 2019: 80 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 7
FWCI
10.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Neonatal and Maternal Infections
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
Keywords
neonatal sepsis, disease burden, preterm birth, nosocomial infections, mother-to-child transmission, neonatal immune immaturity, culture-independent diagnostics, antimicrobial stewardship, maternal vaccines, neonatal morbidity and mortality
MeSH terms
Neonatal Sepsis, Algorithms, Anti-Infective Agents, Chorioamnionitis, Cross Infection, Female, Granulocytes, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Pentoxifylline, Pregnancy, Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects, Risk Factors, Free Radical Scavengers, Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor, Immunoglobulins, Intravenous, Blood Component Transfusion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review