Cited by 169Neonatal and Maternal InfectionsSepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentInfant Development and Preterm Care

A neonatal sequential organ failure assessment score predicts mortality to late-onset sepsis in preterm very low birth weight infants

Open access
Wynn, James L., Polin, Richard A.·2020·Pediatric Research

Abstract

Background An operational definition of organ dysfunction applicable to neonates that predicts mortality in the setting of infection is lacking. We determined the utility of an objective, electronic health record (EHR)-automated, neonatal sequential organ failure assessment (nSOFA) score to predict mortality from late-onset sepsis (LOS) in premature, very low birth weight (VLBW) infants.Methods Retrospective, single-center study of bacteremic preterm VLBW newborns admitted between 2012 and 2016. nSOFA scores were derived for patients with LOS at multiple time points surrounding the sepsis evaluation.Results nSOFA scores at evaluation and at all points measured after evaluation were different between survivors and non-survivors. Among patients with an nSOFA score of >4, mortality was higher at evaluation (13% vs 67%, p < 0.001), +6 h (15% vs 64%, p = 0.002), and +12 h (7% vs 71%, p < 0.001) as compared to patients with a score of ≤4. Receiver operating characteristics area under the curve was 0.77 at evaluation (95% CI 0.62-0.92; p = 0.001), 0.78 at +6 h (0.66-0.92; p < 0.001), and 0.93 at +12 h (0.86-0.997; p < 0.001).Conclusions The nSOFA scoring system predicted mortality in VLBW infants with LOS and this automated system was integrated into our EHR. Prediction of LOS mortality is a critical step toward improvements in neonatal sepsis outcomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41390-019-0517-2

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wynn, J. L., & Polin, R. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Florida Health (US)
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Wynn, James L.
Venue
Pediatric Research
Published
2019-08-08
Volume
88
Issue
1
Pages
85-90
ISSN
  • 0031-3998 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-0447
OpenAlex
W2966373709
Cited by
169
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 13
FWCI
16.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pediatric Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM128452)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD089939)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Neonatal and Maternal Infections
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
Keywords
late-onset sepsis, mortality prediction, organ dysfunction, bacteremia
MeSH terms
Neonatal Sepsis, Female, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Premature, Male, Retrospective Studies, Risk, ROC Curve, Severity of Illness Index, Case-Control Studies, Bacteremia, Disease Progression, Infant, Very Low Birth Weight, Electronic Health Records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review