Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 396

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effect of treatment delay on the effectiveness and safety of antifibrinolytics in acute severe haemorrhage: a meta-analysis of individual patient-level data from 40 138 bleeding patients

Open access
Gayet-Ageron, Angèle, Prieto-Merino, David, Ker, Katharine, Shakur, Haleema, Ageron, François-Xavier, Roberts, Ian, Kayani, Aasia, Geer, Amber, Ndungu, Bernard, Fawole, Bukola, Gilliam, Catherine, Adetayo, Cecelia, Barrow, Collette, Beaumont, Danielle, Prowse, Danielle, I'Anson, David, Balogun, Eni, Miah, Hakim, Shakur, Haleema, Roberts, Ian, Brooks, Imogen, Onandia, Julio, Ker, Katharine, Javaid, Kiran, Suncuan, Laura, Frimley, Lauren, Reid, Mia, Arribas, Monica, Benyahia, Myriam, Okunade, Olujide, Edwards, Phil, Chaudhri, Rizwana, Kostrov, Sergey, Kansagra, Sneha, Pepple, Tracey·2018·The Lancet

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Antifibrinolytics reduce death from bleeding in trauma and post-partum haemorrhage. We examined the effect of treatment delay on the effectiveness of antifibrinolytics. METHODS: We did an individual patient-level data meta-analysis of randomised trials done with more than 1000 patients that assessed antifibrinolytics in acute severe bleeding. We identified trials done between Jan 1, 1946, and April 7, 2017, from MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Web of Science, PubMed, Popline, and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. The primary measure of treatment benefit was absence of death from bleeding. We examined the effect of treatment delay on treatment effectiveness using logistic regression models. We investigated the effect of measurement error (misclassification) in sensitivity analyses. This study is registered with PROSPERO, number 42016052155. FINDINGS: We obtained data for 40 138 patients from two randomised trials of tranexamic acid in acute severe bleeding (traumatic and post-partum haemorrhage). Overall, there were 3558 deaths, of which 1408 (40%) were from bleeding. Most (884 [63%] of 1408) bleeding deaths occurred within 12 h of onset. Deaths from post-partum haemorrhage peaked 2-3 h after childbirth. Tranexamic acid significantly increased overall survival from bleeding (odds ratio [OR] 1·20, 95% CI 1·08-1·33; p=0·001), with no heterogeneity by site of bleeding (interaction p=0·7243). Treatment delay reduced the treatment benefit (p<0·0001). Immediate treatment improved survival by more than 70% (OR 1·72, 95% CI 1·42-2·10; p<0·0001). Thereafter, the survival benefit decreased by 10% for every 15 min of treatment delay until 3 h, after which there was no benefit. There was no increase in vascular occlusive events with tranexamic acid, with no heterogeneity by site of bleeding (p=0·5956). Treatment delay did not modify the effect of tranexamic acid on vascular occlusive events. INTERPRETATION: Death from bleeding occurs soon after onset and even a short delay in treatment reduces the benefit of tranexamic acid administration. Patients must be treated immediately. Further research is needed to deepen our understanding of the mechanism of action of tranexamic acid. FUNDING: UK NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme, Pfizer, BUPA Foundation, and J P Moulton Charitable Foundation (CRASH-2 trial). London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Pfizer, UK Department of Health, Wellcome Trust, and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (WOMAN trial).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(17)32455-8

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 26 references

Metadata

Authors
Gayet-Ageron, A., Prieto-Merino, D., Ker, K., Shakur, H., Ageron, F.-X., Roberts, I., Kayani, A., Geer, A., Ndungu, B., Fawole, B., Gilliam, C., Adetayo, C., Barrow, C., Beaumont, D., Prowse, D., I'Anson, D., Balogun, E., Miah, H., Shakur, H., Roberts, I., Brooks, I., Onandia, J., Ker, K., Javaid, K., Suncuan, L., Frimley, L., Reid, M., Arribas, M., Benyahia, M., Okunade, O., Edwards, P., Chaudhri, R., Kostrov, S., Kansagra, S., & Pepple, T.
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-01
Volume
391
Issue
10116
Pages
125-132
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2767208517
Cited by
396
References
26
FWCI
10.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of treatment delay on the effectiveness and safety of antifibrinolytics in acute severe haemorrhage: a meta-analysis of individual patient-level data from 40 138 bleeding patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0140-6736(17)32455-8
The paper
Gayet-Ageron, A., Prieto-Merino, D., Ker, K., Shakur, H., Ageron, F.-X., Roberts, I., Kayani, A., Geer, A., Ndungu, B., Fawole, B., Gilliam, C., Adetayo, C., Barrow, C., Beaumont, D., Prowse, D., I'Anson, D., Balogun, E., Miah, H., Shakur, H., . . . Pepple, T. (2018). Effect of treatment delay on the effectiveness and safety of antifibrinolytics in acute severe haemorrhage: a meta-analysis of individual patient-level data from 40 138 bleeding patients. The Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(17)32455-8

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.