Cited by 711Prenatal Screening and DiagnosticsGenomics and Rare DiseasesFetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders

Prenatal exome sequencing analysis in fetal structural anomalies detected by ultrasonography (PAGE): a cohort study

Open access
Lord, Jenny, McMullan, Dominic J, Eberhardt, Ruth Y, Rinck, Gabriele, Hamilton, Susan J, Quinlan-Jones, Elizabeth, Prigmore, Elena, Keelagher, Rebecca +100 more·2019·The Lancet

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fetal structural anomalies, which are detected by ultrasonography, have a range of genetic causes, including chromosomal aneuploidy, copy number variations (CNVs; which are detectable by chromosomal microarrays), and pathogenic sequence variants in developmental genes. Testing for aneuploidy and CNVs is routine during the investigation of fetal structural anomalies, but there is little information on the clinical usefulness of genome-wide next-generation sequencing in the prenatal setting. We therefore aimed to evaluate the proportion of fetuses with structural abnormalities that had identifiable variants in genes associated with developmental disorders when assessed with whole-exome sequencing (WES). METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, two groups in Birmingham and London recruited patients from 34 fetal medicine units in England and Scotland. We used whole-exome sequencing (WES) to evaluate the presence of genetic variants in developmental disorder genes (diagnostic genetic variants) in a cohort of fetuses with structural anomalies and samples from their parents, after exclusion of aneuploidy and large CNVs. Women were eligible for inclusion if they were undergoing invasive testing for identified nuchal translucency or structural anomalies in their fetus, as detected by ultrasound after 11 weeks of gestation. The partners of these women also had to consent to participate. Sequencing results were interpreted with a targeted virtual gene panel for developmental disorders that comprised 1628 genes. Genetic results related to fetal structural anomaly phenotypes were then validated and reported postnatally. The primary endpoint, which was assessed in all fetuses, was the detection of diagnostic genetic variants considered to have caused the fetal developmental anomaly. FINDINGS: The cohort was recruited between Oct 22, 2014, and June 29, 2017, and clinical data were collected until March 31, 2018. After exclusion of fetuses with aneuploidy and CNVs, 610 fetuses with structural anomalies and 1202 matched parental samples (analysed as 596 fetus-parental trios, including two sets of twins, and 14 fetus-parent dyads) were analysed by WES. After bioinformatic filtering and prioritisation according to allele frequency and effect on protein and inheritance pattern, 321 genetic variants (representing 255 potential diagnoses) were selected as potentially pathogenic genetic variants (diagnostic genetic variants), and these variants were reviewed by a multidisciplinary clinical review panel. A diagnostic genetic variant was identified in 52 (8·5%; 95% CI 6·4-11·0) of 610 fetuses assessed and an additional 24 (3·9%) fetuses had a variant of uncertain significance that had potential clinical usefulness. Detection of diagnostic genetic variants enabled us to distinguish between syndromic and non-syndromic fetal anomalies (eg, congenital heart disease only vs a syndrome with congenital heart disease and learning disability). Diagnostic genetic variants were present in 22 (15·4%) of 143 fetuses with multisystem anomalies (ie, more than one fetal structural anomaly), nine (11·1%) of 81 fetuses with cardiac anomalies, and ten (15·4%) of 65 fetuses with skeletal anomalies; these phenotypes were most commonly associated with diagnostic variants. However, diagnostic genetic variants were least common in fetuses with isolated increased nuchal translucency (≥4·0 mm) in the first trimester (in three [3·2%] of 93 fetuses). INTERPRETATION: WES facilitates genetic diagnosis of fetal structural anomalies, which enables more accurate predictions of fetal prognosis and risk of recurrence in future pregnancies. However, the overall detection of diagnostic genetic variants in a prospectively ascertained cohort with a broad range of fetal structural anomalies is lower than that suggested by previous smaller-scale studies of fewer phenotypes. WES improved the identification of genetic disorders in fetuses with structural abnormalities; however, before clinical implementation, careful consideration should be given to case selection to maximise clinical usefulness. FUNDING: UK Department of Health and Social Care and The Wellcome Trust.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(18)31940-8

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lord, J., McMullan, D. J., Eberhardt, R. Y., Rinck, G., Hamilton, S. J., Quinlan-Jones, E., Prigmore, E., Keelagher, R., Best, S. K., Carey, G. K., Mellis, R., Robart, S., Berry, I. R., Chandler, K. E., Cilliers, D., Cresswell, L., Edwards, S. L., Gardiner, C., Henderson, A., Holden, S. T., Homfray, T., Lester, T., Lewis, R. A., Newbury-Ecob, R., Prescott, K., Quarrell, O. W., Ramsden, S. C., Roberts, E., Tapon, D., Tooley, M. J., Vasudevan, P. C., Weber, A. P., Wellesley, D. G., Westwood, P., White, H., Parker, M., Williams, D., Jenkins, L., Scott, R. H., Kilby, M. D., Chitty, L. S., Hurles, M. E., Maher, E. R., Bateman, M., Berry, I. R., Best, S. K., Campbell, C., Campbell, J., Carey, G., Chandler, K. E., Chitty, L. S., Cilliers, D., Cohen, K., Collingwood, E., Constantinou, P., Cresswell, L., Delmege, C., Eberhardt, R. Y., Edwards, S. L., Ellis, R., Evans, J., Everett, T., Pinto, C. F., Forrester, N., Fowler, E., Gardiner, C., Hamilton, S., Healey, K., Henderson, A., Holden, S. T., Homfray, T., Hudson, R., Hurles, M. E., Jenkins, L., Keelagher, R., Kilby, M. D., Lester, T., Lewis, R., Lord, J., Maher, E. R., Marton, T., McMullan, D. J., Mehta, S., Mellis, R., Newbury-Ecob, R., Park, S.-M., Parker, M., Prescott, K., Prigmore, E., Quarrell, O. W., Quinlan-Jones, E., Ramsden, S. C., Rinck, G., Robart, S., Roberts, E., Rowland, J., Scott, R. H., Steer, J., Tapon, D., Taylor, E. J., Tooley, M. J., Vasudevan, P. C., Weber, A. P., Wellesley, D. G., Westwood, P., White, H., Williams, D., & Wilson, E.
Affiliations
  • Churchill Hospital (GB)
  • North Bristol NHS Trust (GB)
  • National Health Service (GB)
  • Leicester Royal Infirmary (GB)
  • University of Southampton (GB)
  • Great Ormond Street Hospital (GB)
  • Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities (GB)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-02
Volume
393
Issue
10173
Pages
747-757
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2910583407
Cited by
711
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 52 · 2025: 91 · 2024: 104 · 2023: 108 · 2022: 113 · 2021: 100 · 2020: 94 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
90.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo (cc-by)
Funders
UK Department of Health and Wellcome Trust (no. HICF-R7-396)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
Keywords
fetal structural anomalies, prenatal exome sequencing, prenatal genetic diagnosis, fetal medicine, nuchal translucency, prenatal ultrasound, diagnostic yield, developmental disorders, copy number variation
MeSH terms
Congenital Abnormalities, Abortion, Spontaneous, Abortion, Eugenic, Exome Sequencing, Female, Fetus, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Male, Parents, Pregnancy, Prospective Studies, Fetal Development, Nuchal Translucency Measurement, Stillbirth, Live Birth, DNA Copy Number Variations, Abnormal Karyotype, Perinatal Death

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review