The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pembrolizumab versus methotrexate, docetaxel, or cetuximab for recurrent or metastatic head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (KEYNOTE-040): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND There are few effective treatment options for patients with recurrent or metastatic head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma. Pembrolizumab showed antitumour activity and manageable toxicity in early-phase trials. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab versus standard-of-care therapy for the treatment of head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma. METHODS We did a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study at 97 medical centres in 20 countries. Patients with head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma that progressed during or after platinum-containing treatment for recurrent or metastatic disease (or both), or whose disease recurred or progressed within 3-6 months of previous multimodal therapy containing platinum for locally advanced disease, were randomly assigned (1:1) in blocks of four per stratum with an interactive voice-response and integrated web-response system to receive pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks intravenously or investigator's choice of standard doses of methotrexate, docetaxel, or cetuximab intravenously (standard-of-care group). The primary endpoint was overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was analysed in the as-treated population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02252042, and is no longer enrolling patients. FINDINGS Between Dec 24, 2014, and May 13, 2016, 247 patients were randomly allocated to pembrolizumab and 248 were randomly allocated to standard of care. As of May 15, 2017, 181 (73%) of 247 patients in the pembrolizumab group and 207 (83%) of 248 patients in the standard-of-care group had died. Median overall survival in the intention-to-treat population was 8·4 months (95% CI 6·4-9·4) with pembrolizumab and 6·9 months (5·9-8·0) with standard of care (hazard ratio 0·80, 0·65-0·98; nominal p=0·0161). Fewer patients treated with pembrolizumab than with standard of care had grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse events (33 [13%] of 246 vs 85 [36%] of 234). The most common treatment-related adverse event was hypothyroidism with pembrolizumab (in 33 [13%] patients) and fatigue with standard of care (in 43 [18%]). Treatment-related death occurred in four patients treated with pembrolizumab (unspecified cause, large intestine perforation, malignant neoplasm progression, and Stevens-Johnson syndrome) and two patients treated with standard of care (malignant neoplasm progression and pneumonia). INTERPRETATION The clinically meaningful prolongation of overall survival and favourable safety profile of pembrolizumab in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma support the further evaluation of pembrolizumab as a monotherapy and as part of combination therapy in earlier stages of disease. FUNDING Merck Sharp & Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck & Co.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)
Eisenhauer, E. A., Therasse, P., Bogaerts, J., Schwartz, L. H., Sargent, D., Ford, R., Dancey, J., Arbuck, S., Gwyther, S., Mooney, M., et al. (2009) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026 · Cited by 29,534
Herbst, R. S., Baas, P., Kim, D.-W., Felip, E., Pérez-Gracia, J. L., Han, J.-Y., Molina, J., Kim, J.-H., Arvis, C. D., Ahn, M.-J., et al. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(15)01281-7 · Cited by 6,449
Self-citationPembrolizumab for the Treatment of Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Garon, E. B., Rizvi, N. A., Hui, R., Leighl, N., Balmanoukian, A. S., Eder, J. P., Patnaik, A., Aggarwal, C., Gubens, M., Horn, L., et al. (2015) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1501824 · Cited by 6,198
Self-citationNivolumab versus Everolimus in Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma
Motzer, R. J., Escudier, B., McDermott, D. F., George, S., Hammers, H. J., Srinivas, S., Tykodi, S. S., Sosman, J. A., Procopio, G., Plimack, E. R., et al. (2015) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1510665 · Cited by 5,807
Docetaxel plus Prednisone or Mitoxantrone plus Prednisone for Advanced Prostate Cancer
Tannock, I. F., de Wit, R., Berry, W. R., Horti, J., Pluzanska, A., Chi, K. N., Oudard, S., Théodore, C., James, N. D., Turesson, I., et al. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa040720 · Cited by 5,735
Nivolumab for Recurrent Squamous-Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck
Ferris, R. L., Blumenschein, G., Fayette, J., Guigay, J., Colevas, A. D., Licitra, L., Harrington, K., Kasper, S., Vokes, E. E., Even, C., et al. (2016) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1602252 · Cited by 5,101
Self-citationPembrolizumab as Second-Line Therapy for Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma
Bellmunt, J., de Wit, R., Vaughn, D. J., Fradet, Y., Lee, J.-L., Fong, L., Vogelzang, N. J., Climent, M. A., Petrylak, D. P., Choueiri, T. K., et al. (2017) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1613683 · Cited by 3,395
Seiwert, T. Y., Burtness, B., Mehra, R., Weiss, J., Berger, R., Eder, J. P., Heath, K., McClanahan, T., Lunceford, J., Gause, C., et al. (2016) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(16)30066-3 · Cited by 1,745
Self-citation
Cited by
A guide to cancer immunotherapy: from T cell basic science to clinical practice
Waldman, A. D., Fritz, J. M., & Lenardo, M. J. (2020) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41577-020-0306-5 · Cited by 4,154
Burtness, B., Harrington, K. J., Greil, R., Soulières, D., Tahara, M., de Castro, G., Psyrri, A., Basté, N., Neupane, P., Bratland, Å., et al. (2019) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(19)32591-7 · Cited by 3,336
Self-citationChow, L. Q. M. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra1715715 · Cited by 2,075
PD-L1 as a biomarker of response to immune-checkpoint inhibitors
Doroshow, D. B., Bhalla, S., Beasley, M. B., Sholl, L. M., Kerr, K. M., Gnjatic, S., Wistuba, I. I., Rimm, D. L., Tsao, M. S., & Hirsch, F. R. (2021) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41571-021-00473-5 · Cited by 1,575
Machiels, J.-P., René Leemans, C., Golusinski, W., Grau, C., Licitra, L., & Gregoire, V. (2020) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2020.07.011 · Cited by 916
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Cohen, E. E. W., Soulières, D., Le Tourneau, C., Dinis, J., Licitra, L., Ahn, M.-J., Soria, A., Machiels, J.-P., Mach, N., Mehra, R., Burtness, B., Zhang, P., Cheng, J., Swaby, R. F., Harrington, K. J., Acosta-Rivera, M., Adkins, D. R., Aghmesheh, M., Ahn, M.-J., Airoldi, M., Aleknavicius, E., Al-Farhat, Y., Algazi, A. P., Almokadem, S., Alyasova, A., Bauman, J. R., Benasso, M., Berrocal, A., Bray, V., Burtness, B. A., Caponigro, F., Castro, A., Cescon, T. P., Chan, K., Chaudhry, A., Chauffert, B., Cohen, E., Csoszi, T., De Boer, J. P., Delord, J.-P., Dietz, A., Dinis, J., Dupuis, C., Digue, L., Erfan, J., Escobar Alvarez, Y., Evans, M., Fidler, M. J., Forster, M. D., Friesland, S., Ganti, A. K., Geoffrois, L., Grant, C., Gruenwald, V., Harrington, K., Hoffmann, T., Horvai, G., Inciura, A., Jang, R., Jankowska, P., Jimeno, A., Joseph, M., Juarez Ramiro, A., Karaszewska, B., Kawecki, A., Keilholz, U., Keller, U., Kim, S.-B., Kocsis, J., Kotecki, N., Kozloff, M. F., Lambea, J., Landherr, L., Lantsukhay, Y., Lazarev, S. A., Lee, L. W., Le Tourneau, C., Licitra, L., Lifirenko, I. D., Mach, N., Martincic, D., Matorin, O. V., McGrath, M., Machiels, J.-P., Mehra, R., Misiukiewicz, K., Morris, J. C., Mufazalov, F. F., Niu, J., Pamoorthy Srinivasan, D., Perez Segura, P., Rauch, D., Ribeiro, M. L., Rodriguez, C., Rolland, F., Russo, A., Ruzsa, A., Sanches, F., Shin, S.-W., Shtiveland, M., Soulieres, D., Soria, A., Specenier, P., Szekanecz, E., Szota, J., van Herpen, C. M. L., Velez-Cortes, H. A., Walsh, W. V., Wilop, S., Winterhalder, R., Wojtukiewicz, M., Wong, D., & Zandberg, D.
- Venue
- The Lancet
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-01
- Volume
- 393
- Issue
- 10167
- Pages
- 156-167
- ISSN
- 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
- 0140-6736
- OpenAlex
- W2903493423
- Cited by
- 1,709
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 128.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pembrolizumab versus methotrexate, docetaxel, or cetuximab for recurrent or metastatic head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (KEYNOTE-040): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0140-6736(18)31999-8
- The paper
- Cohen, E. E. W., Soulières, D., Le Tourneau, C., Dinis, J., Licitra, L., Ahn, M.-J., Soria, A., Machiels, J.-P., Mach, N., Mehra, R., Burtness, B., Zhang, P., Cheng, J., Swaby, R. F., Harrington, K. J., Acosta-Rivera, M., Adkins, D. R., Aghmesheh, M., Ahn, M.-J., . . . Zandberg, D. (2019). Pembrolizumab versus methotrexate, docetaxel, or cetuximab for recurrent or metastatic head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (KEYNOTE-040): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. The Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(18)31999-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.