Cited by 3,336Head and Neck Cancer StudiesCancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersNonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies

Pembrolizumab alone or with chemotherapy versus cetuximab with chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (KEYNOTE-048): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study

Open access
Burtness, Barbara, Harrington, Kevin J, Greil, Richard, Soulières, Denis, Tahara, Makoto, de Castro, Gilberto, Psyrri, Amanda, Basté, Neus +211 more·2019·The Lancet

Abstract

Background Pembrolizumab is active in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), with programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression associated with improved response.Methods KEYNOTE-048 was a randomised, phase 3 study of participants with untreated locally incurable recurrent or metastatic HNSCC done at 200 sites in 37 countries. Participants were stratified by PD-L1 expression, p16 status, and performance status and randomly allocated (1:1:1) to pembrolizumab alone, pembrolizumab plus a platinum and 5-fluorouracil (pembrolizumab with chemotherapy), or cetuximab plus a platinum and 5-fluorouracil (cetuximab with chemotherapy). Investigators and participants were aware of treatment assignment. Investigators, participants, and representatives of the sponsor were masked to the PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) results; PD-L1 positivity was not required for study entry. The primary endpoints were overall survival (time from randomisation to death from any cause) and progression-free survival (time from randomisation to radiographically confirmed disease progression or death from any cause, whichever came first) in the intention-to-treat population (all participants randomly allocated to a treatment group). There were 14 primary hypotheses: superiority of pembrolizumab alone and of pembrolizumab with chemotherapy versus cetuximab with chemotherapy for overall survival and progression-free survival in the PD-L1 CPS of 20 or more, CPS of 1 or more, and total populations and non-inferiority (non-inferiority margin: 1·2) of pembrolizumab alone and pembrolizumab with chemotherapy versus cetuximab with chemotherapy for overall survival in the total population. The definitive findings for each hypothesis were obtained when statistical testing was completed for that hypothesis; this occurred at the second interim analysis for 11 hypotheses and at final analysis for three hypotheses. Safety was assessed in the as-treated population (all participants who received at least one dose of allocated treatment). This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02358031.Findings Between April 20, 2015, and Jan 17, 2017, 882 participants were allocated to receive pembrolizumab alone (n=301), pembrolizumab with chemotherapy (n=281), or cetuximab with chemotherapy (n=300); of these, 754 (85%) had CPS of 1 or more and 381 (43%) had CPS of 20 or more. At the second interim analysis, pembrolizumab alone improved overall survival versus cetuximab with chemotherapy in the CPS of 20 or more population (median 14·9 months vs 10·7 months, hazard ratio [HR] 0·61 [95% CI 0·45-0·83], p=0·0007) and CPS of 1 or more population (12·3 vs 10·3, 0·78 [0·64-0·96], p=0·0086) and was non-inferior in the total population (11·6 vs 10·7, 0·85 [0·71-1·03]). Pembrolizumab with chemotherapy improved overall survival versus cetuximab with chemotherapy in the total population (13·0 months vs 10·7 months, HR 0·77 [95% CI 0·63-0·93], p=0·0034) at the second interim analysis and in the CPS of 20 or more population (14·7 vs 11·0, 0·60 [0·45-0·82], p=0·0004) and CPS of 1 or more population (13·6 vs 10·4, 0·65 [0·53-0·80], p<0·0001) at final analysis. Neither pembrolizumab alone nor pembrolizumab with chemotherapy improved progression-free survival at the second interim analysis. At final analysis, grade 3 or worse all-cause adverse events occurred in 164 (55%) of 300 treated participants in the pembrolizumab alone group, 235 (85%) of 276 in the pembrolizumab with chemotherapy group, and 239 (83%) of 287 in the cetuximab with chemotherapy group. Adverse events led to death in 25 (8%) participants in the pembrolizumab alone group, 32 (12%) in the pembrolizumab with chemotherapy group, and 28 (10%) in the cetuximab with chemotherapy group.Interpretation Based on the observed efficacy and safety, pembrolizumab plus platinum and 5-fluorouracil is an appropriate first-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic HNSCC and pembrolizumab monotherapy is an appropriate first-line treatment for PD-L1-positive recurrent or metastatic HNSCC.Funding Merck Sharp & Dohme.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(19)32591-7

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two fatal cases of myocarditis showed overexpression of cardiac proteins in the tumors of the affected patients.

    “Another study of two fatal cases of myocarditis showed overexpression of cardiac proteins in the tumors of the affected patients, also potentially suggesting an overlap.18”

    From Endocrine toxicities of immune checkpoint inhibitors (2021) · cites this paper as [18]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Bauml J, Seiwert TY, Pfister DG, et al. Pembrolizumab for platinum and cetuximabrefractory head and neck cancer: results from a singlearm, phase II study. J Clin Oncol 2017; 35: 1542-49.
  2. Cohen EEW, Soulières D, Le Tourneau C, et al. Pembrolizumab versus methotrexate, docetaxel, or cetuximab for recurrent or metastatic headandneck squamous cell carcinoma (KEYNOTE040): a randomised, openlabel, phase 3 study. Lancet 2019; 393: 156-67.
  3. Borghaei H, PazAres L, Horn L, et al. Nivolumab versus docetaxel in advanced nonsquamous nonsmallcell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2015; 373: 1627-39.
  4. Brahmer J, Reckamp KL, Baas P, et al. Nivolumab versus docetaxel in advanced squamouscell nonsmallcell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2015; 373: 123-35.
  5. Ferris RL, Blumenschein G Jr, Fayette J, et al. Nivolumab for recurrent squamouscell carcinoma of the head and neck. N Engl J Med 2016; 375: 1856-67.
  6. Herbst RS, Baas P, Kim DW, et al. Pembrolizumab versus docetaxel for previously treated, PDL1positive, advanced nonsmallcell lung cancer (KEYNOTE010): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2016; 387: 1540-50.
  7. Motzer RJ, Escudier B, McDermott DF, et al. Nivolumab versus everolimus in advanced renalcell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2015; 373: 1803-13.
  8. Aspeslagh S, Matias M, Palomar V, et al. In the immunooncology era, is antiPD1 or antiPDL1 immunotherapy modifying the sensitivity to conventional cancer therapies? Eur J Cancer 2017; 87: 65-74.
  9. Schvartsman G, Peng SA, Bis G, et al. Response rates to singleagent chemotherapy after exposure to immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 2017; 112: 90-95.
  10. Park SE, Lee SH, Ahn JS, Ahn MJ, Park K, Sun JM. Increased response rates to salvage chemotherapy administered after PD1/PDL1 inhibitors in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2018; 13: 106-11.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Burtness, B., Harrington, K. J., Greil, R., Soulières, D., Tahara, M., de Castro, G., Psyrri, A., Basté, N., Neupane, P., Bratland, Å., Fuereder, T., Hughes, B. G. M., Mesía, R., Ngamphaiboon, N., Rordorf, T., Wan Ishak, W. Z., Hong, R.-L., González Mendoza, R., Roy, A., Zhang, Y., Gumuscu, B., Cheng, J. D., Jin, F., Rischin, D., Lerzo, G., Tatangelo, M., Varela, M., Zarba, J. J., Boyer, M., Gan, H., Gao, B., Hughes, B., Mallesara, G., Rischin, D., Taylor, A., Burian, M., Fuereder, T., Greil, R., Barrios, C. H., de Castro Junior, D. O., Castro, G., Franke, F. A., Girotto, G., Lima, I. P. F., Nicolau, U. R., Pinto, G. D. J., Santos, L., Victorino, A.-P., Chua, N., Couture, F., Gregg, R., Hansen, A., Hilton, J., McCarthy, J., Soulieres, D., Ascui, R., Gonzalez, P., Villanueva, L., Torregroza, M., Zambrano, A., Holeckova, P., Kral, Z., Melichar, B., Prausova, J., Vosmik, M., Andersen, M., Gyldenkerne, N., Jurgens, H., Putnik, K., Reinikainen, P., Gruenwald, V., Laban, S., Aravantinos, G., Boukovinas, I., Georgoulias, V., Psyrri, A., Kwong, D., Al-Farhat, Y., Csoszi, T., Erfan, J., Horvai, G., Landherr, L., Remenar, E., Ruzsa, A., Szota, J., Billan, S., Gluck, I., Gutfeld, O., Popovtzer, A., Benasso, M., Bui, S., Ferrari, V., Licitra, L., Nole, F., Fujii, T., Fujimoto, Y., Hanai, N., Hara, H., Matsumoto, K., Mitsugi, K., Monden, N., Nakayama, M., Okami, K., Oridate, N., Shiga, K., Shimizu, Y., Sugasawa, M., Tahara, M., Takahashi, M., Takahashi, S., Tanaka, K., Ueda, T., Yamaguchi, H., Yamazaki, T., Yasumatsu, R., Yokota, T., Yoshizaki, T., Kudaba, I., Stara, Z., Wan Ishak, W. Z., Cheah, S. K., Aguilar Ponce, J., Gonzalez Mendoza, R., Hernandez Hernandez, C., Medina Soto, F., Buter, J., Hoeben, A., Oosting, S., Suijkerbuijk, K., Bratland, A., Brydoey, M., Alvarez, R., Mas, L., Caguioa, P., Querol, J., Regala, E. E., Tamayo, M. B., Villegas, E. M., Kawecki, A., Karpenko, A., Klochikhin, A., Smolin, A., Zarubenkov, O., Goh, B. C., Cohen, G., du Toit, J., Jordaan, C., Landers, G., Ruff, P., Szpak, W., Tabane, N., Brana, I., Iglesias Docampo, L., Lavernia, J., Mesia, R., Abel, E., Muratidu, V., Nielsen, N., Cristina, V., Rordorf, T., Rothschild, S., Hong, R.-L., Wang, H.-M., Yang, M.-H., Yeh, S.-P., Yen, C.-J., Ngamphaiboon, N., Soparattanapaisarn, N., Sriuranpong, V., Aksoy, S., Cicin, I., Ekenel, M., Harputluoglu, H., Ozyilkan, O., Harrington, K., Agarwala, S., Ali, H., Alter, R., Anderson, D., Bruce, J., Burtness, B., Campbell, N., Conde, M., Deeken, J., Edenfield, W., Feldman, L., Gaughan, E., Goueli, B., Halmos, B., Hegde, U., Hunis, B., Jotte, R., Karnad, A., Khan, S., Laudi, N., Laux, D., Martincic, D., McCune, S., McGaughey, D., Misiukiewicz, K., Mulford, D., Nadler, E., Neupane, P., Nunnink, J., Ohr, J., O'Malley, M., Patson, B., Paul, D., Popa, E., Powell, S., Redman, R., Rella, V., Rocha Lima, C., Sivapiragasam, A., Su, Y., Sukari, A., Wong, S., Yilmaz, E., & Yorio, J.
Affiliations
  • Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari (ES)
  • Oslo University Hospital (NO)
  • Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) (US)
  • Mahidol University (TH)
  • Paracelsus Medical University (AT)
  • National Cancer Center Hospital East (JP)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Autonomous University of Chihuahua (MX)
ORCID
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-11
Volume
394
Issue
10212
Pages
1915-1928
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2986633517
Cited by
3,336
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 434 · 2025: 551 · 2024: 549 · 2023: 522 · 2022: 535 · 2021: 465 · 2020: 270 · 2019: 5 · 2013: 1
FWCI
268.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Amgen
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Pfizer
  • AstraZeneca
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • Sanofi
  • Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0515-10101)
  • Eisai
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (17H01590, 17K19718)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Head and Neck Cancer Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
Keywords
cetuximab, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, recurrent or metastatic cancer, PD-L1 expression, PD-L1 combined positive score, immune checkpoint inhibitors, overall survival, progression-free survival, non-inferiority, p16 status, treatment safety
MeSH terms
Cetuximab, Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological, Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck, Progression-Free Survival, Aged, Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Female, Fluorouracil, Head and Neck Neoplasms, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review