Cited by 1,384Cervical Cancer and HPV ResearchGenital Health and DiseaseWomen's cancer prevention and management

Population-level impact and herd effects following the introduction of human papillomavirus vaccination programmes: updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Drolet, Mélanie, Bénard, Élodie, Pérez, Norma, Brisson, Marc, Ali, Hammad, Boily, Marie-Claude, Baldo, Vincenzo, Brassard, Paul +43 more·2019·The Lancet

Abstract

Background More than 10 years have elapsed since human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination was implemented. We did a systematic review and meta-analysis of the population-level impact of vaccinating girls and women against human papillomavirus on HPV infections, anogenital wart diagnoses, and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2+ (CIN2+) to summarise the most recent evidence about the effectiveness of HPV vaccines in real-world settings and to quantify the impact of multiple age-cohort vaccination. Methods In this updated systematic review and meta-analysis, we used the same search strategy as in our previous paper. We searched MEDLINE and Embase for studies published between Feb 1, 2014, and Oct 11, 2018. Studies were eligible if they compared the frequency (prevalence or incidence) of at least one HPV-related endpoint (genital HPV infections, anogenital wart diagnoses, or histologically confirmed CIN2+) between pre-vaccination and post-vaccination periods among the general population and if they used the same population sources and recruitment methods before and after vaccination. Our primary assessment was the relative risk (RR) comparing the frequency (prevalence or incidence) of HPV-related endpoints between the pre-vaccination and post-vaccination periods. We stratified all analyses by sex, age, and years since introduction of HPV vaccination. We used random-effects models to estimate pooled relative risks. Findings We identified 1702 potentially eligible articles for this systematic review and meta-analysis, and included 65 articles in 14 high-income countries: 23 for HPV infection, 29 for anogenital warts, and 13 for CIN2+. After 5-8 years of vaccination, the prevalence of HPV 16 and 18 decreased significantly by 83% (RR 0·17, 95% CI 0·11-0·25) among girls aged 13-19 years, and decreased significantly by 66% (RR 0·34, 95% CI 0·23-0·49) among women aged 20-24 years. The prevalence of HPV 31, 33, and 45 decreased significantly by 54% (RR 0·46, 95% CI 0·33-0·66) among girls aged 13-19 years. Anogenital wart diagnoses decreased significantly by 67% (RR 0·33, 95% CI 0·24-0·46) among girls aged 15-19 years, decreased significantly by 54% (RR 0·46, 95% CI 0.36-0.60) among women aged 20-24 years, and decreased significantly by 31% (RR 0·69, 95% CI 0·53-0·89) among women aged 25-29 years. Among boys aged 15-19 years anogenital wart diagnoses decreased significantly by 48% (RR 0·52, 95% CI 0·37-0·75) and among men aged 20-24 years they decreased significantly by 32% (RR 0·68, 95% CI 0·47-0·98). After 5-9 years of vaccination, CIN2+ decreased significantly by 51% (RR 0·49, 95% CI 0·42-0·58) among screened girls aged 15-19 years and decreased significantly by 31% (RR 0·69, 95% CI 0·57-0·84) among women aged 20-24 years. Interpretation This updated systematic review and meta-analysis includes data from 60 million individuals and up to 8 years of post-vaccination follow-up. Our results show compelling evidence of the substantial impact of HPV vaccination programmes on HPV infections and CIN2+ among girls and women, and on anogenital warts diagnoses among girls, women, boys, and men. Additionally, programmes with multi-cohort vaccination and high vaccination coverage had a greater direct impact and herd effects. Funding WHO, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Fonds de recherche du Québec - Santé.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(19)30298-3

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 97

  1. [1]Bruni L, Diaz M, Barrionuevo-Roses L, Worldwide female and male HPV vaccination coverage from 2006 to 2016. International Papillomavirus Conference; Cape Town; Feb 28–March 4, 2017.
  2. [3]Drolet M, Bénard É, Boily MC, Population-level impact and herd effects following human papillomavirus vaccination programmes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 2015; 15: 565– 80. 25744474 PMC5144106
  3. [5]WHO. Human papillomavirus vaccines: WHO position paper, May 2017–recommendations. Vaccine 2017; 35: 5753– 55. 28596091
  4. [7]Garland SM, Steben M, Sings HL, Natural history of genital warts: analysis of the placebo arm of 2 randomized phase III trials of a quadrivalent human papillomavirus (types 6, 11, 16, and 18) vaccine. J Infect Dis 2009; 199: 805– 14. 19199546
  5. [8]DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986; 7: 177– 88. 3802833
  6. [9]Deeks JJ, Higgins JPT, on behalf of the Statistical Methods Group of the Cochrane Collaboration. Statistical algorithms in Review Manager 5 https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/statistical-methods-revman5 (accessed May 23, 2014).
  7. [11]Dillner J, Nygård M, Munk C, Decline of HPV infections in Scandinavian cervical screening populations after introduction of HPV vaccination programs. Vaccine 2018; 36: 3820– 29. 29778519
  8. [12]Chow EP, Danielewski JA, Fehler G, Human papillomavirus in young women with Chlamydia trachomatis infection 7 years after the Australian human papillomavirus vaccination programme: a cross-sectional study. Lancet Infect Dis 2015; 15: 1314– 23. 26201300
  9. [13]Chow EPF, Machalek DA, Tabrizi SN, Quadrivalent vaccine-targeted human papillomavirus genotypes in heterosexual men after the Australian female human papillomavirus vaccination programme: a retrospective observational study. Lancet Infect Dis 2017; 17: 68– 77. 27282422
  10. [14]Cummings T, Zimet GD, Brown D, Reduction of HPV infections through vaccination among at-risk urban adolescents. Vaccine 2012; 30: 5496– 99. 22750043 PMC3423324
  11. [15]Dunne EF, Naleway A, Smith N, Reduction in human papillomavirus vaccine type prevalence among young women screened for cervical cancer in an integrated US healthcare delivery system in 2007 and 2012–2013. J Infect Dis 2015; 212: 1970– 75. 26123561 PMC13521327
  12. [16]Grün N, Ährlund-Richter A, Franzén J, Follow-up on oral and cervical human papillomavirus prevalence 2013–2015 in youth at a youth clinic in Stockholm, Sweden. Infect Dis (Lond) 2016; 48: 169– 70. 26536907
  13. [17]Kavanagh K, Pollock KG, Potts A, Introduction and sustained high coverage of the HPV bivalent vaccine leads to a reduction in prevalence of HPV 16/18 and closely related HPV types. Br J Cancer 2014; 110: 2804– 11. 24736582 PMC4037824
  14. [18]Cameron RL, Kavanagh K, Pan J, Human papillomavirus prevalence and herd immunity after introduction of vaccination program, Scotland, 2009–2013. Emerg Infect Dis 2016; 22: 56– 64. 26692336 PMC4696690
  15. [19]Kavanagh K, Pollock KG, Cuschieri K, Changes in the prevalence of human papillomavirus following a national bivalent human papillomavirus vaccination programme in Scotland: a 7-year cross-sectional study. Lancet Infect Dis 2017; 17: 1293– 302. 28965955
  16. [20]Kahn JA, Brown DR, Ding L, Vaccine-type human papillomavirus and evidence of herd protection after vaccine introduction. Pediatrics 2012; 130: e249– 56. 22778297 PMC3408690
  17. [21]Kahn JA, Widdice LE, Ding L, Substantial decline in vaccine-type human papillomavirus (HPV) among vaccinated young women during the first 8 years after HPV vaccine introduction in a community. Clin Infect Dis 2016; 63: 1281– 87. 27655996 PMC5091346
  18. [22]Machalek DA, Garland SM, Brotherton JML, Very low prevalence of vaccine human papillomavirus types among 18- to 35-year old Australian women 9 years following implementation of vaccination. J Infect Dis 2018; 217: 1590– 600. 29425358
  19. [23]Markowitz LE, Hariri S, Lin C, Reduction in human papillomavirus (HPV) prevalence among young women following HPV vaccine introduction in the United States, National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys, 2003–2010. J Infect Dis 2013; 208: 385– 93. 23785124
  20. [24]Markowitz LE, Liu G, Hariri S, Steinau M, Dunne EF, Unger ER. Prevalence of HPV after introduction of the vaccination program in the United States. Pediatrics 2016; 137: e20151968. 26908697
  21. [25]Oliver SE, Unger ER, Lewis R, Prevalence of human papillomavirus among females after vaccine introduction— National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, United States, 2003–2014. J Infect Dis 2017; 216: 594– 603. 28931217 PMC5740482
  22. [26]Mesher D, Panwar K, Thomas SL, Beddows S, Soldan K. Continuing reductions in HPV 16/18 in a population with high coverage of bivalent HPV vaccination in England: an ongoing cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 2016; 6: e009915. PMC4762111 26868944
  23. [27]Mesher D, Soldan K, Howell-Jones R, Reduction in HPV 16/18 prevalence in sexually active young women following the introduction of HPV immunisation in England. Vaccine 2013; 32: 26– 32. 24211166 PMC3898718
  24. [28]Mesher D, Panwar K, Thomas SL, The impact of the national HPV vaccination program in England using the bivalent HPV vaccine: surveillance of type-specific HPV in young females, 2010–2016. J Infect Dis 2018; 218: 911– 21. 29917082
  25. [29]Purriños-Hermida MJ, Santiago-Pérez MI, Treviño M, Direct, indirect and total effectiveness of bivalent HPV vaccine in women in Galicia, Spain. PLoS One 2018; 13: e0201653. 30075010 PMC6075752
  26. [30]Söderlund-Strand A, Uhnoo I, Dillner J. Change in population prevalences of human papillomavirus after initiation of vaccination: the high-throughput HPV monitoring study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2014; 23: 2757– 64. 25380734
  27. [31]Sonnenberg P, Clifton S, Beddows S, Prevalence, risk factors, and uptake of interventions for sexually transmitted infections in Britain: findings from the National Surveys of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (Natsal). Lancet 2013; 382: 1795– 806. 24286785 PMC3899025
  28. [32]Tabrizi SN, Brotherton JML, Kaldor JM, Fall in human papillomavirus prevalence following a national vaccination program. J Infect Dis 2012; 206: 1645– 51. 23087430
  29. [33]Tabrizi SN, Brotherton JML, Kaldor JM, Assessment of herd immunity and cross-protection after a human papillomavirus vaccination programme in Australia: a repeat cross-sectional study. Lancet Infect Dis 2014; 14: 958– 66. 25107680
  30. [34]Ali H, Donovan B, Wand H, Genital warts in young Australians five years into national human papillomavirus vaccination programme: national surveillance data. BMJ 2013; 346: f2032. 23599298
  31. [35]Ali H, McManus H, O’Connor CC, Human papillomavirus vaccination and genital warts in young Indigenous Australians: national sentinel surveillance data. Med J Aust 2017; 206: 204– 09. 28301790
  32. [36]Chow EP, Read TR, Wigan R, Ongoing decline in genital warts among young heterosexuals 7 years after the Australian human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination programme. Sex Transm Infect 2015; 91: 214– 19. 25305210
  33. [38]Baandrup L, Blomberg M, Dehlendorff C, Sand C, Andersen KK, Kjaer SK. Significant decrease in the incidence of genital warts in young Danish women after implementation of a national human papillomavirus vaccination program. Sex Transm Dis 2013; 40: 130– 35. 23324976
  34. [39]Bollerup S, Baldur-Felskov B, Blomberg M, Baandrup L, Dehlendorff C, Kjaer SK. Significant reduction in the incidence of genital warts in young men 5 years into the Danish human papillomavirus vaccination program for girls and women. Sex Transm Dis 2016; 43: 238– 42. 26967300
  35. [40]Bauer HM, Wright G, Chow J. Evidence of human papillomavirus vaccine effectiveness in reducing genital warts: an analysis of California public family planning administrative claims data, 2007–2010. Am J Public Health 2012; 102: 833– 35. 22420808 PMC3483904
  36. [41]Cocchio S, Baldovin T, Bertoncello C, Decline in hospitalization for genital warts in the Veneto region after an HPV vaccination program: an observational study. BMC Infect Dis 2017; 17: 249. 28381294 PMC5382454
  37. [42]Dominiak-Felden G, Gobbo C, Simondon F. Evaluating the early benefit of quadrivalent HPV vaccine on genital warts in Belgium: a cohort study. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0132404. 26147096 PMC4492693
  38. [43]Flagg EW, Schwartz R, Weinstock H. Prevalence of anogenital warts among participants in private health plans in the United States, 2003–2010: potential impact of human papillomavirus vaccination. Am J Public Health 2013; 103: 1428– 35. 23763409 PMC4007878
  39. [44]Flagg EW, Torrone EA. Declines in anogenital warts among age groups most likely to be impacted by human papillomavirus vaccination, United States, 2006–2014. Am J Public Health 2018; 108: 112– 19. 29161070 PMC5719685
  40. [45]Guerra FM, Rosella LC, Dunn S, Wilson SE, Chen C, Deeks SL. Early impact of Ontario’s human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination program on anogenital warts (AGWs): a population-based assessment. Vaccine 2016; 34: 4678– 83. 27527815
  41. [46]Harrison C, Britt H, Garland S, Decreased management of genital warts in young women in Australian general practice post introduction of national HPV vaccination program: results from a nationally representative cross-sectional general practice study. PLoS One 2014; 9: e105967. 25180698 PMC4152193
  42. [47]Howell-Jones R, Soldan K, Wetten S, Declining genital warts in young women in England associated with HPV 16/18 vaccination: an ecological study. J Infect Dis 2013; 208: 1397– 403. 24092908 PMC3789575
  43. [48]Canvin M, Sinka K, Hughes G, Mesher D. Decline in genital warts diagnoses among young women and young men since the introduction of the bivalent HPV (16/18) vaccination programme in England: an ecological analysis. Sex Transm Infect 2017; 93: 125– 28. 27365492
  44. [49]Kliewer EV, Mahmud SM, Demers AA, Lambert P, Musto G. Quadrivalent HPV vaccination and the incidence of anogenital warts in Manitoba, Canada. 28th International Papillomavirus Conference; San Juan, Puerto Rico; Nov 30–Dec 6, 2012 Abstract E07–663.
  45. [50]Thompson LH, Nugent Z, Blanchard JF, Ens C, Yu BN. Increasing incidence of anogenital warts with an urban-rural divide among males in Manitoba, Canada, 1990–2011. BMC Public Health 2016; 16: 219. 26939696 PMC4778275
  46. [51]Leval A, Herweijer E, Arnheim-Dahlström L, Incidence of genital warts in Sweden before and after quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine availability. J Infect Dis 2012; 206: 860– 66. 22815381
  47. [52]Herweijer E, Ploner A, Sparén P. Substantially reduced incidence of genital warts in women and men six years after HPV vaccine availability in Sweden. Vaccine 2018; 36: 1917– 20. 29523448
  48. [53]Liu B, Donovan B, Brotherton JM, Saville M, Kaldor JM. Genital warts and chlamydia in Australian women: comparison of national population-based surveys in 2001 and 2011. Sex Transm Infect 2014; 90: 532– 37. 24570485
  49. [54]Mikolajczyk RT, Kraut AA, Horn J, Schulze-Rath R, Garbe E. Changes in incidence of anogenital warts diagnoses after the introduction of human papillomavirus vaccination in Germany—an ecologic study. Sex Transm Dis 2013; 40: 28– 31. 23250300
  50. [55]Thöne K, Horn J, Mikolajczyk R. Evaluation of vaccination herd immunity effects for anogenital warts in a low coverage setting with human papillomavirus vaccine-an interrupted time series analysis from 2005 to 2010 using health insurance data. BMC Infect Dis 2017; 17: 564. 28806926 PMC5557251
  51. [56]Oliphant J, Perkins N. Impact of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine on genital wart diagnoses at Auckland Sexual Health Services. N Z Med J 2011; 124: 51– 58. 21952330
  52. [57]Oliphant J, Stewart J, Saxton P, Lo M, Perkins N, Ward D. Trends in genital warts diagnoses in New Zealand five years following the quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine introduction. N Z Med J 2017; 130: 9– 16. 28337036
  53. [58]Smith MA, Liu B, McIntyre P, Menzies R, Dey A, Canfell K. Fall in genital warts diagnoses in the general and indigenous Australian population following implementation of a national human papillomavirus vaccination program: analysis of routinely collected national hospital data. J Infect Dis 2015; 211: 91– 99. 25117753
  54. [59]Smith MA, Liu B, McIntyre P, Menzies R, Dey A, Canfell K. Trends in genital warts by socioeconomic status after the introduction of the national HPV vaccination program in Australia: analysis of national hospital data. BMC Infect Dis 2016; 16: 52. 26829924 PMC4736242
  55. [60]Sonnenberg P, Tanton C, King E, Genital warts & HPV 6/11 in the British population: data from the third National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (Natsal-3). 31st International Papillomavirus Conference; Cape Town; Feb 28–March 4, 2017 Abstract 454.
  56. [61]Steben M, Ouhoummane N, Rodier C, Sinyavskaya L, Brassard P. The early impact of human papillomavirus vaccination on anogenital warts in Québec, Canada. J Med Virol 2018; 90: 592– 98. 28980715
  57. [62]Woestenberg PJ, King AJ, van der Sande MA, No evidence for cross-protection of the HPV-16/18 vaccine against HPV-6/11 positivity in female STI clinic visitors. J Infect 2017; 74: 393– 400. 28126492
  58. [63]Sandø N, Kofoed K, Zachariae C, Fouchard J. A reduced national incidence of anogenital warts in young Danish men and women after introduction of a national quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccination programme for young women – an ecological study. Acta Derm Venereol 2014; 94: 288– 92. 24150529
  59. [64]Nsouli-Maktabi H, Ludwig SL, Yerubandi UD, Gaydos JC. Incidence of genital warts among U.S. service members before and after the introduction of the quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine. MSMR 2013; 20: 17– 20. 23461306
  60. [65]Baldur-Felskov B, Dehlendorff C, Junge J, Munk C, Kjaer SK. Incidence of cervical lesions in Danish women before and after implementation of a national HPV vaccination program. Cancer Causes Control 2014; 25: 915– 22. 24797870
  61. [66]Baldur-Felskov B, Munk C, Nielsen TSS, Trends in the incidence of cervical cancer and severe precancerous lesions in Denmark, 1997–2012. Cancer Causes Control 2015; 26: 1105– 16. 26033777
  62. [67]Benard VB, Castle PE, Jenison SA, Population-based incidence rates of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in the human papillomavirus vaccine era. JAMA Oncol 2017; 3: 833– 37. 27685805 PMC5765871
  63. [68]Brotherton JM, Fridman M, May CL, Chappell G, Saville AM, Gertig DM. Early effect of the HPV vaccination programme on cervical abnormalities in Victoria, Australia: an ecological study. Lancet 2011; 377: 2085– 92. 21684381
  64. [71]Flagg EW, Torrone EA, Weinstock H. Ecological Association of Human Papillomavirus Vaccination with Cervical Dysplasia Prevalence in the United States, 2007–2014. Am J Public Health 2016; 106: 2211– 18. 27736208 PMC5105011
  65. [72]Gargano JW, Park IU, Griffin MR, Trends in high-grade cervical lesions and cervical cancer screening in five states, 2008–2015. Clin Infect Dis 2018; 10.1093/cid/ciy707. PMC6783904 30137283 · DOI
  66. [73]Niccolai LM, Julian PJ, Meek JI, McBride V, Hadler JL, Sosa LE. Declining rates of high-grade cervical lesions in young women in Connecticut, 2008–2011. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2013; 22: 1446– 50. 23704476
  67. [74]Niccolai LM, Meek JI, Brackney M, Hadler JL, Sosa LE, Weinberger DM. Declines in human papillomavirus (HPV)–associated high-grade cervical lesions after introduction of HPV vaccines in Connecticut, United States, 2008–2015. Clin Infect Dis 2017; 65: 884– 89. 28520854
  68. [75]Liaw KL, Kjaer S, Nygard M, Dillner J. Utilization of nordic countries national registries to monitor the impact of HPV vaccination. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2014; 23: 356.
  69. [76]Ogilvie GS, Naus M, Money DM, Reduction in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in young women in British Columbia after introduction of the HPV vaccine: an ecological analysis. Int J Cancer 2015; 137: 1931– 37. 25754686
  70. [77]Pollock KG, Kavanagh K, Potts A, Reduction of low- and high-grade cervical abnormalities associated with high uptake of the HPV bivalent vaccine in Scotland. Br J Cancer 2014; 111: 1824– 30. 25180766 PMC4453734
  71. [78]Chen HY, Kessler CL, Mori N, Chauhan SP. Cervical cancer screening in the United States, 1993–2010: characteristics of women who are never screened. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2012; 21: 1132– 38. 22873781
  72. [79]Jemal A, Simard EP, Dorell C, Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975–2009, featuring the burden and trends in human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated cancers and HPV vaccination coverage levels. J Natl Cancer Inst 2013; 105: 175– 201. 23297039 PMC3565628
  73. [80]Tiro JA, Tsui J, Bauer HM, Yamada E, Kobrin S, Breen N. Human papillomavirus vaccine use among adolescent girls and young adult women: an analysis of the 2007 California Health Interview Survey. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2012; 21: 656– 65. 22420920 PMC3412579
  74. [81]Chao C, Silverberg MJ, Becerra TA, Human papillomavirus vaccination and subsequent cervical cancer screening in a large integrated healthcare system. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017; 216: 151.e1– 9. 27746152 PMC5290188
  75. [82]Drolet M, Laprise JF, Brotherton JML, The impact of human papillomavirus catch-up vaccination in Australia: implications for introduction of multiple age cohort vaccination and postvaccination data interpretation. J Infect Dis 2017; 216: 1205– 09. 28968800 PMC5853481
  76. [83]Chaiyakunapruk N, Ng SS. Summary of evidence. Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination: an updated systematic review of cost-effectiveness analyses. Meeting of the Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization (SAGE); Geneva; October, 2016.
  77. [84]WHO. Human papillomavirus vaccines: WHO position paper, October 2014. Wkly Epidemiol Rec 2014; 89: 465– 91. 25346960
  78. [85]Meites E, Kempe A, Markowitz LE. Use of a 2-dose schedule for human papillomavirus vaccination —updated recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2016; 65: 1405– 08. 27977643
  79. [86]Pagliusi SR, Teresa Aguado M. Efficacy and other milestones for human papillomavirus vaccine introduction. Vaccine 2004; 23: 569– 78. 15630792
  80. [87]National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI). Statement on human papillomavirus vaccine. An advisory committee statement (ACS). Can Commun Dis Rep 2007; 33 (ACS-2): 1– 31. 17520773
  81. [90]Richardson LA, Tota J, Franco EL. Optimizing technology for cervical cancer screening in high-resource settings. Expert Rev Obstet Gynecol 2011; 6: 343– 53. 26617667 PMC4659856
  82. [91]Canfell K, Caruana M, Gebski V, Cervical screening with primary HPV testing or cytology in a population of women in which those aged 33 years or younger had previously been offered HPV vaccination: results of the compass pilot randomised trial. PLoS Med 2017; 14: e1002388. 28926579 PMC5604935
  83. [92]Drolet M, Boily MC, Greenaway C, Sociodemographic inequalities in sexual activity and cervical cancer screening: implications for the success of human papillomavirus vaccination. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2013; 22: 641– 52. 23549400
  84. [93]Herweijer E, Feldman AL, Ploner A, The participation of HPV-vaccinated women in a national cervical screening program: population-based cohort study. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0134185. 26218492 PMC4517931
  85. [94]Tanton C, Soldan K, Beddows S, High-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and cervical cancer prevention in Britain: Evidence of differential uptake of interventions from a probability survey. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2015; 24: 842– 53. 25737331 PMC4435666
  86. [95]Brotherton JML, Gertig DM, May C, Chappell G, Saville M. HPV vaccine impact in Australian women: ready for an HPV-based screening program. Med J Aust 2016; 204: 184. 26985843
  87. [96]Liu G, Hariri S, Bradley H, Gottlieb SL, Leichliter JS, Markowitz LE. Trends and patterns of sexual behaviors among adolescents and adults aged 14 to 59 years, United States. Sex Transm Dis 2015; 42: 20– 26. 25504296 PMC6785975
  88. [97]Lewis R, Tanton C, Mercer CH, Heterosexual practices among young people in Britain: evidence from three national surveys of sexual attitudes and lifestyles. J Adolesc Health 2017; 61: 694– 702. 29169520 PMC5723633
  89. [98]Mercer CH, Tanton C, Prah P, Changes in sexual attitudes and lifestyles in Britain through the life course and over time: findings from the National Surveys of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (Natsal). Lancet 2013; 382: 1781– 94. 24286784 PMC3899021
  90. [99]Rissel C, Badcock PB, Smith AM, Heterosexual experience and recent heterosexual encounters among Australian adults: the Second Australian Study of Health and Relationships. Sex Health 2014; 11: 416– 26. 25376995
  91. [100]Jensen KE, Munk C, Sparen P, Women’s sexual behavior. Population-based study among 65,000 women from four Nordic countries before introduction of human papillomavirus vaccination. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2011; 90: 459– 67. 21306319
  92. [101]Stenhammar C, Ehrsson YT, Åkerud H, Larsson M, Tydén T. Sexual and contraceptive behavior among female university students in Sweden—repeated surveys over a 25-year period. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2015; 94: 253– 59. 25619646 PMC4671320
  93. [102]Herlitz CA, Forsberg M. Sexual behaviour and risk assessment in different age cohorts in the general population of Sweden (1989–2007). Scand J Public Health 2010; 38: 32– 39. 19948649
  94. [103]Cocchio S, Bertoncello C, Baldovin T, Buja A, Majori S, Baldo V. Self-reported genital warts among sexually-active university students: a cross-sectional study. BMC Infect Dis 2018; 18: 41. 29334908 PMC5769424
  95. [104]Marino C, Vieno A, Lenzi M, Santinello M. Time trends in adolescent sexual behaviour in Italy. Sex Health 2014; 11: 379– 80. 25100103
  96. [105]Mori S, Nakao S, Kukimoto I, Kusumoto-Matsuo R, Kondo K, Kanda T. Biased amplification of human papillomavirus DNA in specimens containing multiple human papillomavirus types by PCR with consensus primers. Cancer Sci 2011; 102: 1223– 27. 21388488 PMC11159067
  97. [106]Tota JE, Ramanakumar AV, Jiang M, Epidemiologic approaches to evaluating the potential for human papillomavirus type replacement postvaccination. Am J Epidemiol 2013; 178: 625– 34. 23660798 PMC3736757

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Drolet, M., Bénard, É., Pérez, N., Brisson, M., Ali, H., Boily, M.-C., Baldo, V., Brassard, P., Brotherton, J. M. L., Callander, D., Checchi, M., Chow, E. P. F., Cocchio, S., Dalianis, T., Deeks, S. L., Dehlendorff, C., Donovan, B., Fairley, C. K., Flagg, E. W., Gargano, J. W., Garland, S. M., Grün, N., Hansen, B. T., Harrison, C., Herweijer, E., Imburgia, T. M., Johnson, A. M., Kahn, J. A., Kavanagh, K., Kjaer, S. K., Kliewer, E. V., Liu, B., Machalek, D. A., Markowitz, L., Mesher, D., Munk, C., Niccolai, L., Nygård, M., Ogilvie, G., Oliphant, J., Pollock, K. G., Purriños-Hermida, M. J., Smith, M. A., Steben, M., Söderlund-Strand, A., Sonnenberg, P., Sparen, P., Tanton, C., Wheeler, C. M., Woestenberg, P. J., & Yu, B. N.
Affiliations
  • Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec-Université Laval (CA)
  • Université Laval (CA)
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CA)
Corresponding author
Brisson, Marc
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-08
Volume
394
Issue
10197
Pages
497-509
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2955245499
Cited by
1,384
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 192 · 2025: 169 · 2024: 163 · 2023: 151 · 2022: 149 · 2021: 161 · 2020: 362 · 2019: 37
FWCI
25.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ResearchOnline (Glasgow Caledonian University) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • ResearchOnline (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • UNSWorks (University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Rivm Repository (Netherlands National Institute for Public Health and the Environment) (submittedVersion)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
  • Rivm (National Institute for Public Health and the Environment) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (FDN-143283)
  • Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé
  • World Health Organization
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Genital Health and Disease
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
Keywords
HPV vaccination, herd effect, population effects, HPV infection, genital warts, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, HPV 16/18, HPV prevalence, HPV incidence, women aged 20-24
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Uterine Cervical Dysplasia, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Condylomata Acuminata, Female, Humans, Male, Incidence, Prevalence, Age Distribution, Endpoint Determination, Papillomaviridae, Papillomavirus Infections, Mass Vaccination, Papillomavirus Vaccines, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review