Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 786

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Atezolizumab with or without chemotherapy in metastatic urothelial cancer (IMvigor130): a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial

Open access
Galsky, Matthew D, Arija, José Ángel Arranz, Bamias, Aristotelis, Davis, Ian D, De Santis, Maria, Kikuchi, Eiji, Garcia-del-Muro, Xavier, De Giorgi, Ugo, Mencinger, Marina, Izumi, Kouji, Panni, Stefano, Gumus, Mahmut, Özgüroğlu, Mustafa, Kalebasty, Arash Rezazadeh, Park, Se Hoon, Alekseev, Boris, Schutz, Fabio A, Li, Jian-Ri, Ye, Dingwei, Vogelzang, Nicholas J, Bernhard, Sandrine, Tayama, Darren, Mariathasan, Sanjeev, Mecke, Almut, Thåström, AnnChristine, Grande, Enrique·2020·The Lancet

Abstract

BACKGROUND Atezolizumab can induce sustained responses in metastatic urothelial carcinoma. We report the results of IMvigor130, a phase 3 trial that compared atezolizumab with or without platinum-based chemotherapy versus placebo plus platinum-based chemotherapy in first-line metastatic urothelial carcinoma. METHODS In this multicentre, phase 3, randomised trial, untreated patients aged 18 years or older with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma, from 221 sites in 35 countries, were randomly assigned to receive atezolizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy (group A), atezolizumab monotherapy (group B), or placebo plus platinum-based chemotherapy (group C). Patients received 21-day cycles of gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2 body surface area, administered intravenously on days 1 and 8 of each cycle), plus either carboplatin (area under the curve of 4·5 mg/mL per min administered intravenously) or cisplatin (70 mg/m2 body surface area administered intravenously) on day 1 of each cycle with either atezolizumab (1200 mg administered intravenously on day 1 of each cycle) or placebo. Group B patients received 1200 mg atezolizumab, administered intravenously on day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The co-primary efficacy endpoints for the intention-to-treat population were investigator-assessed Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours 1.1 progression-free survival and overall survival (group A vs group C) and overall survival (group B vs group C), which was to be formally tested only if overall survival was positive for group A versus group C. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02807636. FINDINGS Between July 15, 2016, and July 20, 2018, we enrolled 1213 patients. 451 (37%) were randomly assigned to group A, 362 (30%) to group B, and 400 (33%) to group C. Median follow-up for survival was 11·8 months (IQR 6·1-17·2) for all patients. At the time of final progression-free survival analysis and interim overall survival analysis (May 31, 2019), median progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population was 8·2 months (95% CI 6·5-8·3) in group A and 6·3 months (6·2-7·0) in group C (stratified hazard ratio [HR] 0·82, 95% CI 0·70-0·96; one-sided p=0·007). Median overall survival was 16·0 months (13·9-18·9) in group A and 13·4 months (12·0-15·2) in group C (0·83, 0·69-1·00; one-sided p=0·027). Median overall survival was 15·7 months (13·1-17·8) for group B and 13·1 months (11·7-15·1) for group C (1·02, 0·83-1·24). Adverse events that led to withdrawal of any agent occurred in 156 (34%) patients in group A, 22 (6%) patients in group B, and 132 (34%) patients in group C. 50 (11%) patients in group A, 21 (6%) patients in group B, and 27 (7%) patients in group C had adverse events that led to discontinuation of atezolizumab or placebo. INTERPRETATION Addition of atezolizumab to platinum-based chemotherapy as first-line treatment prolonged progression-free survival in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma. The safety profile of the combination was consistent with that observed with the individual agents. These results support the use of atezolizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy as a potential first-line treatment option for metastatic urothelial carcinoma. FUNDING F Hoffmann-La Roche and Genentech.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30230-0

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Cited by

See all 786

Metadata

Authors
Galsky, M. D., Arija, J. Á. A., Bamias, A., Davis, I. D., De Santis, M., Kikuchi, E., Garcia-del-Muro, X., De Giorgi, U., Mencinger, M., Izumi, K., Panni, S., Gumus, M., Özgüroğlu, M., Kalebasty, A. R., Park, S. H., Alekseev, B., Schutz, F. A., Li, J.-R., Ye, D., Vogelzang, N. J., Bernhard, S., Tayama, D., Mariathasan, S., Mecke, A., Thåström, A., & Grande, E.
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-05
Volume
395
Issue
10236
Pages
1547-1557
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W3024551702
Cited by
786
References
22
FWCI
111.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Atezolizumab with or without chemotherapy in metastatic urothelial cancer (IMvigor130): a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30230-0
The paper
Galsky, M. D., Arija, J. Á. A., Bamias, A., Davis, I. D., De Santis, M., Kikuchi, E., Garcia-del-Muro, X., De Giorgi, U., Mencinger, M., Izumi, K., Panni, S., Gumus, M., Özgüroğlu, M., Kalebasty, A. R., Park, S. H., Alekseev, B., Schutz, F. A., Li, J.-R., Ye, D., . . . Grande, E. (2020). Atezolizumab with or without chemotherapy in metastatic urothelial cancer (IMvigor130): a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. The Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30230-0

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.