Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,178

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

SARS-CoV-2 and viral sepsis: observations and hypotheses

Open access
Li, Hui, Liu, Liang, Zhang, Dingyu, Xu, Jiuyang, Dai, Huaping, Tang, Nan, Su, Xiao, Cao, Bin·2020·The Lancet

Abstract

Since the outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), clinicians have tried every effort to understand the disease, and a brief portrait of its clinical features have been identified. In clinical practice, we noticed that many severe or critically ill COVID-19 patients developed typical clinical manifestations of shock, including cold extremities and weak peripheral pulses, even in the absence of overt hypotension. Understanding the mechanism of viral sepsis in COVID-19 is warranted for exploring better clinical care for these patients. With evidence collected from autopsy studies on COVID-19 and basic science research on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and SARS-CoV, we have put forward several hypotheses about SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis after multiple rounds of discussion among basic science researchers, pathologists, and clinicians working on COVID-19. We hypothesise that a process called viral sepsis is crucial to the disease mechanism of COVID-19. Although these ideas might be proven imperfect or even wrong later, we believe they can provide inputs and guide directions for basic research at this moment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30920-x

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 1,178

Metadata

Authors
Li, H., Liu, L., Zhang, D., Xu, J., Dai, H., Tang, N., Su, X., & Cao, B.
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-05
Volume
395
Issue
10235
Pages
1517-1520
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W3016771699
Cited by
1,178
References
7
FWCI
31.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SARS-CoV-2 and viral sepsis: observations and hypotheses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30920-x
The paper
Li, H., Liu, L., Zhang, D., Xu, J., Dai, H., Tang, N., Su, X., & Cao, B. (2020). SARS-CoV-2 and viral sepsis: observations and hypotheses. The Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30920-x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.