Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 3,041

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

First-line nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for advanced gastric, gastro-oesophageal junction, and oesophageal adenocarcinoma (CheckMate 649): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial

Open access
Janjigian, Yelena Y, Shitara, Kohei, Moehler, Markus, Garrido, Marcelo, Salman, Pamela, Shen, Lin, Wyrwicz, Lucjan, Yamaguchi, Kensei, Skoczylas, Tomasz, Campos Bragagnoli, Arinilda, Liu, Tianshu, Schenker, Michael, Yanez, Patricio, Tehfe, Mustapha, Kowalyszyn, Ruben, Karamouzis, Michalis V, Bruges, Ricardo, Zander, Thomas, Pazo-Cid, Roberto, Hitre, Erika, Feeney, Kynan, Cleary, James M, Poulart, Valerie, Cullen, Dana, Lei, Ming, Xiao, Hong, Kondo, Kaoru, Li, Mingshun, Ajani, Jaffer A·2021·The Lancet

Abstract

Summary Background First-line chemotherapy for advanced/metastatic human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative gastric/gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma results in median overall survival (OS) <1 year. The phase 3 CheckMate 649 study evaluated first-line programmed death (PD)-1 inhibitor-based therapies in gastric/GEJ/oesophageal adenocarcinoma; we report first results for nivolumab-plus-chemotherapy versus chemotherapy. Methods We enrolled adults with previously untreated, unresectable, non-HER2-positive gastric/GEJ/oesophageal adenocarcinoma, regardless of PD-ligand (L)1 expression. Patients were randomised to nivolumab (360 mg every 3 weeks or 240 mg every 2 weeks)-plus-chemotherapy (XELOX every 3 weeks or FOLFOX every 2 weeks), nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab, or chemotherapy. Primary endpoints for nivolumab-plus-chemotherapy versus chemotherapy were OS or progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review, in PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥5 patients. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of the assigned treatment. Findings From March 2017 through April 2019, we concurrently randomised 1581 patients to treatment (nivolumab-plus-chemotherapy, 789; chemotherapy, 792). The median follow-up for OS was: nivolumab-plus-chemotherapy, 13·1 months (IQR, 6·7–19·1) and chemotherapy, 11·1 months (5·8–16·1). Nivolumab-plus-chemotherapy resulted in significant improvements in OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0·71 [98·4% CI 0·59–0·86]; p<0·0001) and PFS (HR 0·68 [98% CI 0·56–0·81]; p<0·0001) versus chemotherapy in PD-L1 CPS ≥5 patients (minimum follow-up, 12·1 months). Additional results showed significant improvement in OS, along with PFS benefit, in PD-L1 CPS ≥1 and all-randomised patients. Among all-treated patients, 462 (59%, nivolumab-plus-chemotherapy) and 341 (44%, chemotherapy) patients had grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events. No new safety signals were identified. Interpretation Nivolumab is the first PD-1 inhibitor to demonstrate superior OS, along with PFS benefit, and an acceptable safety profile, in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in previously untreated patients with advanced gastric/GEJ/oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Nivolumab-plus-chemotherapy represents a potential standard first-line treatment for these patients. Funding Bristol Myers Squibb (Princeton, NJ, USA), in collaboration with Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02872116.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00797-2

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 3,041

Metadata

Authors
Janjigian, Y. Y., Shitara, K., Moehler, M., Garrido, M., Salman, P., Shen, L., Wyrwicz, L., Yamaguchi, K., Skoczylas, T., Campos Bragagnoli, A., Liu, T., Schenker, M., Yanez, P., Tehfe, M., Kowalyszyn, R., Karamouzis, M. V., Bruges, R., Zander, T., Pazo-Cid, R., Hitre, E., Feeney, K., Cleary, J. M., Poulart, V., Cullen, D., Lei, M., Xiao, H., Kondo, K., Li, M., & Ajani, J. A.
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-07
Volume
398
Issue
10294
Pages
27-40
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W3171517418
Cited by
3,041
References
2
FWCI
154.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: First-line nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for advanced gastric, gastro-oesophageal junction, and oesophageal adenocarcinoma (CheckMate 649): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00797-2
The paper
Janjigian, Y. Y., Shitara, K., Moehler, M., Garrido, M., Salman, P., Shen, L., Wyrwicz, L., Yamaguchi, K., Skoczylas, T., Campos Bragagnoli, A., Liu, T., Schenker, M., Yanez, P., Tehfe, M., Kowalyszyn, R., Karamouzis, M. V., Bruges, R., Zander, T., Pazo-Cid, R., . . . Ajani, J. A. (2021). First-line nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for advanced gastric, gastro-oesophageal junction, and oesophageal adenocarcinoma (CheckMate 649): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. The Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00797-2

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.