Once-weekly cagrilintide for weight management in people with overweight and obesity: A multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled and active-controlled, dose-finding phase 2 trial
Open accessAbstract
Background Natural amylin is a pancreatic hormone that induces satiety. Cagrilintide is a long-acting amylin analogue under investigation for weight management. We assessed the dose-response relationship of cagrilintide regarding the effects on bodyweight, safety, and tolerability.Methods We conducted a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled and active-controlled, dose-finding phase 2 trial at 57 sites including hospitals, specialist clinics, and primary care centres in ten countries (Canada, Denmark, Finland, Ireland, Japan, Poland, Serbia, South Africa, the UK, and the USA). Eligible participants were adults aged at least 18 years without diabetes, with a body-mass index of at least 30 kg/m 2 or at least 27 kg/m 2 with hypertension or dyslipidaemia. Participants were randomly assigned (6:1) to subcutaneous self-injections of once-weekly cagrilintide (0·3, 0·6, 1·2, 2·4, or 4·5 mg), once-daily liraglutide 3·0 mg, or volume-matched placebo (for six placebo groups). The trial had a 26-week treatment period, including a dose-escalation period of up to 6 weeks, and a 6-week follow-up period without treatment. Participants and investigators were masked to the assigned study treatment with respect to active versus pooled placebo treatment, but not to different active treatments. The primary endpoint was the percentage change in bodyweight from baseline to week 26, assessed in all randomly assigned participants according to the trial product estimand (assuming all participants were adherent to treatment) and to the treatment policy estimand (regardless of adherence to treatment). Safety was assessed in all participants who received at least one dose of randomised treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03856047, and is closed to new participants.Findings Between March 1 and Aug 19, 2019, we randomly assigned 706 participants to cagrilintide 0·3-4·5 mg (100-102 per dose group), 99 to liraglutide 3·0 mg, and 101 to placebo. Permanent treatment discontinuation (n=73 [10%]) occurred similarly across treatment groups, mostly due to adverse events (n=30 [4%]). In total, 29 participants (4%) withdrew from the trial. According to the trial product estimand, mean percentage weight reductions from baseline were greater with all doses of cagrilintide (0·3-4·5 mg, 6·0%-10·8% [6·4-11·5 kg]) versus placebo (3·0% [3·3 kg]; estimated treatment difference range 3·0%-7·8%; p<0·001). Weight reductions were also greater with cagrilintide 4·5 mg versus liraglutide 3·0 mg (10·8% [11·5 kg] vs 9·0% [9·6 kg]; estimated treatment difference 1·8%, p=0·03). Similar weight loss reductions were observed with the treatment policy estimand. The most frequent adverse events were gastrointestinal disorders (eg, nausea, constipation, and diarrhoea) and administration-site reactions. More participants receiving cagrilintide 0·3-4·5 mg had gastrointestinal adverse events compared with placebo (41%-63% vs 32%), primarily nausea (20%-47% vs 18%).Interpretation Treatment with cagrilintide in people with overweight and obesity led to significant reductions in bodyweight and was well tolerated. The findings support the development of molecules with novel mechanisms of action for weight management.Funding Novo Nordisk A/S.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Gastrointestinal adverse events with cagrisema were more than with semaglutide or cagrilintide monotherapy, but serious adverse events and adverse events leading to discontinuation were minimal and similar between groups.
“Gastrointestinal AE with cagrisema were more than with semagutide or cagrilintide monotherapy, however the SAE and AE leading to medication discontinuation were minimal and similar between the groups [87, 90]”
From What is the pipeline for future medications for obesity? (2025) · cites this paper as [87]
The Results and Table 3 report low rates of serious adverse events and adverse events leading to discontinuation across the studied groups. But those groups received cagrilintide alone, liraglutide, or placebo—not CagriSema or semaglutide—so this paper cannot support the claimed comparison of gastrointestinal events or safety between those treatments. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe most frequently reported adverse events with cagrilintide 0.3-4.5 mg were gastrointestinal disorders, more common than in the placebo arm (41%-63% vs 32%), primarily nausea (20%-47% vs 18%).
“The most frequently reported adverse events with cagrilintide 0.3e4.5 mg were gastrointestinal disorders that were more common than in the M. Kokkorakis, M. Chakhtoura, C. Rhayem et al. Pharmacological Reviews 77 (2025) 100002 placebo arm (41%e63% vs 32%), primarily nausea (20%e47% vs 18%) (Appendix 3) (Lau et al, 2021).”
From Emerging pharmacotherapies for obesity: A systematic review (2025) · cites this paper as Lau et al, 2021
Table 3 (On-treatment adverse events; page not provided) reports nausea in 19.8%–46.5% of the cagrilintide groups versus 17.8% of the pooled placebo group, matching the claim’s rounded figures. The retrieved passages do not give the stated 41%–63% versus 32% incidence for gastrointestinal disorders as a group, so that part remains unsupported by our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredMonotherapy with cagrilintide, an amylin receptor agonist, produced a 10.6% weight loss at maximum titrated dose compared to placebo (2.8%) and liraglutide 3.0 mg (8.4%).
“Monotherapy with cagrilintide, an amylin receptor agonist produced a 10.6% weight loss at maximum titrated dose compared to placebo (2.8%) and liraglutide 3.0 mg (8.4%).58”
From GLP-1 single, dual, and triple receptor agonists for treating type 2 diabetes and obesity: a narrative review (2024) · cites this paper as [58]
The trial findings report greater weight loss with the highest cagrilintide dose (4.5 mg) than with placebo or liraglutide 3.0 mg. But the reported percentages are 10.8%, 3.0%, and 9.0%, respectively, not the claim’s 10.6%, 2.8%, and 8.4%. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredWhen co-administered with semaglutide (CagriSema), cagrilintide and semaglutide act synergistically to produce greater weight loss and improved glycemic control than either agent alone, without significantly increasing the incidence or severity of gastrointestinal adverse events.
“When co-administered with the GLP-1 receptor agonist semaglutide (CagriSema®), they act synergistically to produce greater weight loss and improved glycemic control than either agent alone, without significantly increasing the incidence or severity of gastrointestinal adverse events [72,73].”
From Obesity: Clinical Impact, Pathophysiology, Complications, and Modern Innovations in Therapeutic Strategies (2025) · cites this paper as [73]
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn a phase 2 trial, cagrilintide produced mean weight reductions of -6.0% to -10.8% versus -3.0% with placebo.
“At the end of the study, the mean percentage weight reductions from baseline were greater with all doses of cagrilintide (0.3e4.5 mg, e6.0% to e10.8%) versus placebo (e3.0%; estimated treatment difference range 3.0%e7.8%;P < .001)(Fig. 4) (Lau et al, 2021).”
From Emerging pharmacotherapies for obesity: A systematic review (2025) · cites this paper as Lau et al, 2021
Cagrilintide is an amylin receptor agonist administered once weekly subcutaneously.
“Cagrilintide (once-weekly subcutaneous administration) is an amylin receptor agonist.150”
From GLP-1 receptor agonists and next-generation incretin-based medications: metabolic, cardiovascular, and renal benefits (2026) · cites this paper as [150]
In a phase 2 trial, once weekly cagrilintide resulted in dose-dependent weight loss between 6 and 10.8% compared to 9% with liraglutide 3 mg and 3% with placebo.
“Cagrilintide is a newer long-acting amylin analogue - in a phase 2 trial, once weekly cagrilintide resulted in a dose-dependent WL between 6 and 10.8% compared to 9% with liraglutide 3 mg and 3% with placebo [87].”
From What is the pipeline for future medications for obesity? (2025) · cites this paper as [87]
Weight reductions were greater with cagrilintide 4.5 mg than with liraglutide 3.0 mg (−10.8% vs −9.0%; estimated treatment difference 1.8%, P = .03).
“Weight reductions were also greater with cagrilintide 4.5 mg versus liraglutide 3.0 mg (e10.8%vs e9.0%; estimated treatment difference 1.8%, P ¼ .03)(Lau et al, 2021).”
From Emerging pharmacotherapies for obesity: A systematic review (2025) · cites this paper as Lau et al, 2021
In a phase 2 trial of cagrilintide, mean percentage weight reductions from baseline were greater with all doses (0.3-4.5 mg, −6.0% to −10.8%) than with placebo (−3.0%; estimated treatment difference range 3.0%-7.8%; P < .001).
“At the end of the study, the mean percentage weight reductions from baseline were greater with all doses of cagrilintide (0.3e4.5 mg, e6.0% to e10.8%) versus placebo (e3.0%; estimated treatment difference range 3.0%e7.8%;P < .001)(Fig. 4) (Lau et al, 2021).”
From Emerging pharmacotherapies for obesity: A systematic review (2025) · cites this paper as Lau et al, 2021
The long-acting amylin analogue cagrilintide has recently been shown to reduce body weight by about 10% at doses of 2.4 mg and 4.5 mg injected subcutaneously once weekly during a 26-week study in overweight and obese individuals.
“A closely related long-acting amylin analogue, cagrilintide has recently been shown to reduce body weight by about 10% at doses of 2.4 mg and 4.5 mg injected subcutaneously once weekly during a 26-week study in overweight and obese individuals [41,42].”
From Recent advances in peptide-based therapies for obesity and type 2 diabetes (2024) · cites this paper as [42]
In a phase 2 study, cagrilintide in doses 0.3 mg to 4.5 mg resulted in up to 10.8% WL in people with overweight/obesity without diabetes compared to 9% with liraglutide 3 mg and 3% WL with placebo.
“In a phase 2 study, cagrilintide in doses ranging from 0.3 mg to 4.5 mg resulted in up to 10.8% WL in people with overweight/obesity without diabetes compared to 9% with the GLP-1 RA liraglutide 3 mg and 3% WL with placebo [62].”
In a phase Ib trial, after 20 weeks, the group that received semaglutide 2.4 mg plus cagrilintide 2.4 mg weekly lost 17.1% weight, whereas the group that received semaglutide 2.4 mg monotherapy lost 9.8% weight.
“After 20 weeks, which included a 16-week dose titration, the group that received the combination of semaglutide 2.4 mg plus cagrilintide 2.4 mg weekly lost 17.1% weight, whereas the group that received monotherapy with semaglutide 2.4 mg weekly lost 9.8% weight (53).”
From New Frontiers in Obesity Treatment: GLP-1 and Nascent Nutrient-Stimulated Hormone-Based Therapeutics (2023) · cites this paper as [53]
Gastrointestinal side effects and administration site reactions with cagrilintide were tolerable with slow dose titration.
“Gastrointestinal side effects and administration site reactions that were tolerable with slow dose titration, although fatigue appears to be a unique side effect of cagrilintide over GLP-1 receptor agonists [115].”
From Obesity pharmacotherapy in older adults: a narrative review of evidence (2025) · cites this paper as [115]
One phase 2 trial demonstrated that weekly injections of cagrilintide induced 10.8% weight loss over 26 weeks, compared with 9% with liraglutide and 3% with placebo, in participants with mean age 52.3 years and no upper age limit.
“One phase 2 trial demonstrated that weekly injections of cagrilintide induced 10.8% weight loss over 26 weeks, compared to 9% with liraglutide, and 3% with placebo (mean age 52.3 years, with no upper age limit).”
From Obesity pharmacotherapy in older adults: a narrative review of evidence (2025) · cites this paper as [115]
Fatigue appears to be a unique side effect of cagrilintide over GLP-1 receptor agonists.
“Gastrointestinal side effects and administration site reactions that were tolerable with slow dose titration, although fatigue appears to be a unique side effect of cagrilintide over GLP-1 receptor agonists [115].”
From Obesity pharmacotherapy in older adults: a narrative review of evidence (2025) · cites this paper as [115]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 24 · Cited by 278
Research works printed but not linked: 57
- [23]23. Wharton S, Lau DCW, Vallis M, et al. Obesity in adults: a clinical practice guideline. CMAJ 2020; 192(31): E875-91.
- [24]24. Kwok S, Adam S, Ho JH, et al. Obesity: a critical risk factor in the COVID-19 pandemic. Clin Obes 2020; 10(6): e12403.
- [25]25. Knowler WC, Barrett-Connor E, Fowler SE, et al. Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. N Engl J Med 2002; 346(6): 393-403.
- [26]26. Wing RR, Lang W, Wadden TA, et al. Benefits of modest weight loss in improving cardiovascular risk factors in overweight and obese individuals with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2011; 34(7): 1481-6.
- [28]28. Khera R, Murad MH, Chandar AK, et al. Association of Pharmacological Treatments for Obesity With Weight Loss and Adverse Events: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Jama 2016; 315(22): 2424-34.
- [29]29. Bessesen DH, Van Gaal LF. Progress and challenges in anti-obesity pharmacotherapy. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2018; 6(3): 237-48.
- [32]32. Karlsson J, Persson LO, Sjöström L, Sullivan M. Psychometric properties and factor structure of the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ) in obese men and women. Results from the Swedish Obese Subjects (SOS) study. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2000; 24(12): 1715-25.
- [33]33. Wharton S, Astrup A, Endahl L, et al. Estimating and reporting treatment effects in clinical trials for weight management: using estimands to interpret effects of intercurrent events and missing data. Int J Obes (Lond) 2021: ePub ahead of print. DOI: 10.1038/s41366-020-00733- x. · DOI
- [35]35. Pi-Sunyer X, Astrup A, Fujioka K, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of 3.0 mg of liraglutide in weight management. N Engl J Med 2015; 373(1): 11-22.
- [36]36. Greenway FL, Fujioka K, Plodkowski RA, et al. Effect of naltrexone plus bupropion on weight loss in overweight and obese adults (COR-I): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2010; 376(9741): 595-605.
- [37]37. Davidson MH, Hauptman J, DiGirolamo M, et al. Weight control and risk factor reduction in obese subjects treated for 2 years with orlistat: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 1999; 281(3): 235-42.
- [38]38. Gadde KM, Allison DB, Ryan DH, et al. Effects of low-dose, controlled-release, phentermine plus topiramate combination on weight and associated comorbidities in overweight and obese adults (CONQUER): a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2011; 377(9774): 1341-52. 4433 Amylin Primary MS 24
- [40]40. Smith SR, Aronne LJ, Burns CM, Kesty NC, Halseth AE, Weyer C. Sustained weight loss following 12-month pramlintide treatment as an adjunct to lifestyle intervention in obesity. Diabetes Care 2008; 31(9): 1816-23.
- [41]41. Wookey PJ, Cao Z, Cooper ME. Interaction of the renal amylin and renin-angiotensin systems in animal models of diabetes and hypertension. Miner Electrolyte Metab 1998; 24(6): 389-99.
- [42]42. Boccia L, Gamakharia S, Coester B, Whiting L, Lutz TA, Le Foll C. Amylin brain circuitry. Peptides 2020; 132: 170366.
- [43]43. Neeland IJ, Poirier P, Després JP. Cardiovascular and metabolic heterogeneity of obesity: clinical challenges and implications for management. Circulation 2018; 137(13): 1391-406.
- [45]45. Ng M, Fleming T, Robinson M, Thomson B, Graetz N, Margono C, et al. Global, regional, and national prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adults during 1980 -2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2014;384(9945):766-81.
- [46]46. Afshin A, Forouzanfar MH, Reitsma MB, Sur P, Estep K, Lee A, et al. Health Effects of Overweight and Obesity in 195 Countries over 25 Years. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(1):13-27.
- [47]47. Zeller MH, Hunsaker S, Mikhail C, Reiter-Purtill J, McCullough MB, Garland B, et al. Family factors that characterize adolescents with severe obesity and their role in weight loss surgery outcomes. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2016;24(12):2562-9.
- [48]48. Han TS, Tajar A, O'Neill TW, Jiang M, Bartfai G, Boonen S, et al. Impaired quality of life and sexual function in overweight and obese men: the European Male Ageing Study. Eur J Endocrinol. 2011;164(6):1003-11.
- [49]49. Soltoft F, Hammer M, Kragh N. The association of body mass index and health -related quality of life in the general population: data from the 2003 Health Survey of England. Qual Life Res. 2009;18(10):1293-9.
- [50]50. Flegal KM, Kit BK, Orpana H, Graubard BI. Association of all-cause mortality with overweight and obesity using standard body mass index categories: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2013;309(1):71-82.
- [51]51. Prospective Studies C, Whitlock G, Lewington S, Sherliker P, Clarke R, Emberson J, et al. Body-mass index and cause-specific mortality in 900 000 adults: collaborative analyses of 57 prospective studies. Lancet. 2009;373(9669):1083-96.
- [53]53. Mechanick JI, Garber AJ, Handelsman Y, Garvey WT. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists' position statement on obesity and obesity medicine. Endocr Pract. 2012;18(5):642-8.
- [54]54. Toplak H, Woodward E, Yumuk V, Oppert JM, Halford JC, Frühbeck G. 2014 EASO Position Statement on the Use of Anti-Obesity Drugs. Obes Facts. 2015;8(3):166-74.
- [55]55. Fruhbeck G, Toplak H, Woodward E, Yumuk V, Maislos M, Oppert JM, et al. Obesity: the gateway to ill health -an EASO position statement on a rising public health, clinical and scientific challenge in Europe. Obes Facts. 2013;6(2):117-20.
- [56]56. Apovian CM, Aronne LJ, Bessesen DH, McDonnell ME, Murad MH, Pagotto U, et al. Pharmacological management of obesity: an endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100(2):342-62.
- [57]57. Yumuk V, Tsigos C, Fried M, Schindler K, Busetto L, Micic D, et al. European Guidelines for Obesity Management in Adults. Obes Facts. 2015;8(6):402-24.
- [58]58. Clarke WL, Cox DJ, Gonder-Frederick LA, Julian D, Schlundt D, Polonsky W. Reduced awareness of hypoglycemia in adults with IDDM. A prospective study of hypoglycemic frequency and associated symptoms. Diabetes Care. 1995;18(4):517-22.
- [59]59. Hofso D, Jenssen T, Hager H, Roislien J, Hjelmesaeth J. Fasting plasma glucose in the screening for type 2 diabetes in morbidly obese subjects. Obes Surg. 2010;20(3):302-7.
- [60]60. Mokdad AH, Ford ES, Bowman BA, Nelson DE, Engelgau MM, Vinicor F, et al. Diabetes trends in the U.S.: 1990-1998. Diabetes Care. 2000;23(9):1278-83. Protocol v 2.0 2.0 1.0 . CONFIDENTIAL Protocol CONFIDENTIAL Date: 02 October 2018 Novo Nordisk Trial ID: NN9838-4433 Version: 2.0 Status: Final Page: 94 of 96
- [61]61. Poirier P, Giles TD, Bray GA, Hong Y, Stern JS, Pi-Sunyer FX, et al. Obesity and cardiovascular disease: pathophysiology, evaluation, and effect of weight loss: an update of the 1997 American Heart Association Scientific Statement on Obesity and Heart Disease from the Obesity Committee of the Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism. Circulation. 2006;113(6):898-918.
- [62]62. Guh DP, Zhang W, Bansback N, Amarsi Z, Birmingham CL, Anis AH. The incidence of co- morbidities related to obesity and overweight: a systematic review and meta -analysis. BMC Public Health. 2009;9:88.
- [63]63. Cusi K. Role of obesity and lipotoxicity in the development of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: pathophysiology and clinical implications. Gastroenterology. 2012;142(4):711 -25 e6.
- [64]64. Deitel M, Stone E, Kassam HA, Wilk EJ, Sutherland DJ. Gynecologic-obstetric changes after loss of massive excess weight following bariatric surgery. J Am Coll Nutr. 1988;7(2):147-53.
- [65]65. Eheman C, Henley SJ, Ballard-Barbash R, Jacobs EJ, Schymura MJ, Noone AM, et al. Annual Report to the Nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2008, featuring cancers associated with excess weight and lack of sufficient physical activity. Cancer. 2012;118(9):2338-66.
- [66]66. Round-table discussion on obesity and weight loss. There is no miraculous cure but persistent physicians can help most people to reduce. Nord Med. 1975;90(5):145-53.
- [68]68. Frühbeck G, Sbraccia P, Nisoli E, Woodward E, Yumuk V, Farpour-Lambert NJ, et al. 2015 Milan Declaration: A Call to Action on Obesity -an EASO Position Statement on the Occasion of the 2015 EXPO. Obes Facts. 2016;9(4):296-8.
- [69]69. Knowler WC, Barrett-Connor E, Fowler SE, Hamman RF, Lachin JM, Walker EA, et al. Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(6):393-403.
- [70]70. Mertens IL, Van Gaal LF. Overweight, obesity, and blood pressure: the effects of modest weight reduction. Obes Res. 2000;8(3):270-8.
- [71]71. Dattilo AM, Kris-Etherton PM. Effects of weight reduction on blood lipids and lipoproteins: a meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr. 1992;56(2):320-8.
- [72]72. Vilar-Gomez E, Martinez-Perez Y, Calzadilla-Bertot L, Torres-Gonzalez A, Gra-Oramas B, Gonzalez-Fabian L, et al. Weight Loss Through Lifestyle Modification Significantly Reduces Features of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis. Gastroenterology. 2015;149(2):367-78 e5; quiz e14-5.
- [73]73. Warkentin LM, Das D, Majumdar SR, Johnson JA, Padwal RS. The effect of weight loss on health-related quality of life: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Obes Rev. 2014;15(3):169-82.
- [75]75. Young A, Denaro M. Roles of amylin in diabetes and in regulation of nutrient load. Nutrition. 1998;14(6):524-7. Protocol v 2.0 2.0 1.0 . CONFIDENTIAL Protocol CONFIDENTIAL Date: 02 October 2018 Novo Nordisk Trial ID: NN9838-4433 Version: 2.0 Status: Final Page: 95 of 96
- [77]77. Novo Nordisk A/S. Investigator's Brochure, NNC0174-0833, project NN9838, (edition 4). Sep 2018.
- [78]78. Wells G, Chernoff J, Gilligan JP, Krause DS. Does salmon calcitonin cause cancer? A review and meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int. 2016;27(1):13-9.
- [79]79. Novo Nordisk A/S. Investigator's Brochure, Liraglutide 3.0 mg (Saxenda®), project NN8022 (edition 11). 31 Mar 2018.
- [80]80. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) CKD Work Group. KDIGO 2012 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Kidney Disease. Kidney Int Suppl. 2013;3(1):1-150.
- [81]81. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9 -Validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16(9):606-13.
- [83]83. Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C, Gooszen HG, Johnson CD, Sarr MG, et al. Classification of acute pancreatitis-2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut. 2013;62(1):102-11.
- [84]84. Ware JE, Jr., Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30(6):473-83.
- [85]85. Cappelleri JC, Bushmakin AG, Gerber RA, Leidy NK, Sexton CC, Lowe MR, et al. Psychometric analysis of the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire-R21: results from a large diverse sample of obese and non-obese participants. Int J Obes (Lond). 2009;33(6):611-20.
- [86]86. Posner K, Oquendo MA, Gould M, Stanley B, Davies M. Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA): classification of suicidal events in the FDA's pediatric suicidal risk analysis of antidepressants. Am J Psychiatry. 2007;164(7):1035-43.
- [87]87. McEvoy BW. Missing data in clinical trials for weight management. J Biopharm Stat. 2016;26(1):30-6.
- [89]89. International Conference on Harmonisation. ICH Harmonised Tripatite Guideline. Guideline for Good Clinical Practise E6(R2), Step 4. 09 Nov 2016.
- [90]90. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals; current version available at www.icmje.org.
- [91]91. De Angelis C, Drazen JM, Frizelle FA, Haug C, Hoey J, Horton R, et al. Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(12):1250-1.
- Authors
- Lau, D. C. W., Erichsen, L., Francisco, A. M., Satylganova, A., le Roux, C. W., McGowan, B., Pedersen, S. D., Pietiläinen, K. H., Rubino, D., & Batterham, R. L.
- Affiliations
- University of Calgary (CA)
- Novo Nordisk (Denmark) (DK)
- Guy's Hospital (GB)
- University of Helsinki (FI)
- Washington Center for Weight Management and Research (US)
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Lau, David C W
- ORCID
- Venue
- The Lancet
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-12
- Volume
- 398
- Issue
- 10317
- Pages
- 2160-2172
- ISSN
- 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
- 0140-6736
- OpenAlex
- W3211623221
- Cited by
- 278
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 75 · 2025: 78 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 18.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- discovery.ucl.ac.uk
- Licence
- Locations
- The Lancet (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Novo Nordisk AS
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Keywords
- cagrilintide, amylin analogues, obesity, overweight, weight management, liraglutide, dose-response relationship, weight loss, satiety, GLP-1 receptor agonists, subcutaneous self-injection, safety and tolerability, treatment discontinuation, hypertension, dyslipidemia, medication adherence
- MeSH terms
- Liraglutide, Africa, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Europe, Female, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Injections, Subcutaneous, Male, Middle Aged, North America, Obesity, Weight Loss, Body Mass Index, Islet Amyloid Polypeptide
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review