Cited by 258Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer StudiesGallbladder and Bile Duct DisordersPediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments

Adjuvant S-1 compared with observation in resected biliary tract cancer (JCOG1202, ASCOT): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial

Nakachi, Kohei, Ikeda, Masafumi, Konishi, Masaru, Nomura, Shogo, Katayama, Hiroshi, Kataoka, Tomoko, Todaka, Akiko, Yanagimoto, Hiroaki +50 more·2023·The Lancet

Abstract

Background S-1 has shown promising efficacy with a mild toxicity profile in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether adjuvant S-1 improved overall survival compared with observation for resected biliary tract cancer.Methods This open-label, multicentre, randomised phase 3 trial was conducted in 38 Japanese hospitals. Patients aged 20-80 years who had histologically confirmed extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, gallbladder carcinoma, ampullary carcinoma, or intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in a resected specimen and had undergone no local residual tumour resection or microscopic residual tumour resection were randomly assigned (1:1) to undergo observation or to receive S-1 (ie, 40 mg, 50 mg, or 60 mg according to body surface area, orally administered twice daily for 4 weeks, followed by 2 weeks of rest for four cycles). Randomisation was performed by the minimisation method, using institution, primary tumour site, and lymph node metastasis as adjustment factors. The primary endpoint was overall survival and was assessed for all randomly assigned patients on an intention-to-treat basis. Safety was assessed in all eligible patients. For the S-1 group, all patients who began the protocol treatment were eligible for a safety assessment. This trial is registered with the University hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000011688).Findings Between Sept 9, 2013, and June 22, 2018, 440 patients were enrolled (observation group n=222 and S-1 group n=218). The data cutoff date was June 23, 2021. Median duration of follow-up was 45·4 months. In the primary analysis, the 3-year overall survival was 67·6% (95% CI 61·0-73·3%) in the observation group compared with 77·1% (70·9-82·1%) in the S-1 group (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0·69, 95% CI 0·51-0·94; one-sided p=0·0080). The 3-year relapse-free survival was 50·9% (95% CI 44·1-57·2%) in the observation group compared with 62·4% (55·6-68·4%) in the S-1 group (HR 0·80, 95% CI 0·61-1·04; two-sided p=0·088). The main grade 3-4 adverse events in the S-1 group were decreased neutrophil count (29 [14%]) and biliary tract infection (15 [7%]).Interpretation Although long-term clinical benefit would be needed for a definitive conclusion, a significant improvement in survival suggested adjuvant S-1 could be considered a standard of care for resected biliary tract cancer in Asian patients.Funding The National Cancer Center Research and the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare of Japan.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(22)02038-4

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nakachi, K., Ikeda, M., Konishi, M., Nomura, S., Katayama, H., Kataoka, T., Todaka, A., Yanagimoto, H., Morinaga, S., Kobayashi, S., Shimada, K., Takahashi, Y., Nakagohri, T., Gotoh, K., Kamata, K., Shimizu, Y., Ueno, M., Ishii, H., Okusaka, T., Furuse, J., Okamura, K., Kawamoto, Y., Katanuma, A., Unno, M., Shirakawa, H., Yamaguchi, H., Takahashi, A., Ikeda, M., Yanagibashi, H., Kato, N., Okusaka, T., Sakamoto, Y., Kojima, Y., Higuchi, R., Sasahira, N., Sano, K., Nakagohri, T., Sunakawa, Y., Morinaga, S., Kumamoto, Y., Sugimori, K., Nomura, T., Shibuya, K., Makino, I., Yamazaki, K., Mizuno, N., Kamata, K., Wada, H., Gotoh, K., Sekimoto, M., Ajiki, T., Nakamura, I., Miki, I., Nagano, H., Ohta, K., Okabayashi, T., Furukawa, M., & Fujimori, N.
Affiliations
  • Tochigi Cancer Center (JP)
  • National Cancer Center Hospital East (JP)
  • National Cancer Center Hospital (JP)
  • Shizuoka Cancer Center (JP)
  • Kansai Medical University (JP)
  • Osaka International Cancer Institute (JP)
  • The Cancer Institute Hospital (JP)
  • Aichi Cancer Center (JP)
  • Kanagawa Cancer Center (JP)
  • Chiba Cancer Center (JP)
  • Kyorin University (JP)
Corresponding author
Nakachi, Kohei
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-01
Volume
401
Issue
10372
Pages
195-203
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W4317488871
Cited by
258
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 61 · 2025: 85 · 2024: 70 · 2023: 41 · 2020: 1
FWCI
68.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (21K07946)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments
Keywords
S-1, adjuvant chemotherapy, biliary tract cancer, extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, gallbladder cancer, ampullary carcinoma, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, overall survival, relapse-free survival, oral fluoropyrimidine, ASCOT
MeSH terms
Adjuvants, Immunologic, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Biliary Tract Neoplasms, Humans, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Proportional Hazards Models, Chemotherapy, Adjuvant, Neoplasm, Residual

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review