CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,123Heart Failure Treatment and ManagementHeart rate and cardiovascular healthAcute Myocardial Infarction Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Safety, tolerability and efficacy of up-titration of guideline-directed medical therapies for acute heart failure (STRONG-HF): a multinational, open-label, randomised, trial

Open access
Mebazaa, Alexandre, Davison, Beth, Chioncel, Ovidiu, Cohen-Solal, Alain, Diaz, Rafael, Filippatos, Gerasimos, Metra, Marco, Ponikowski, Piotr, Sliwa, Karen, Voors, Adriaan A, Edwards, Christopher, Novosadova, Maria, Takagi, Koji, Damasceno, Albertino, Saidu, Hadiza, Gayat, Etienne, Pang, Peter S, Celutkiene, Jelena, Cotter, Gad·2022·The Lancet
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(22)02076-1
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Background There is a paucity of evidence for dose and pace of up-titration of guideline-directed medical therapies after admission to hospital for acute heart failure.Methods In this multinational, open-label, randomised, parallel-group trial (STRONG-HF), patients aged 18-85 years admitted to hospital with acute heart failure, not treated with full doses of guideline-directed drug treatment, were recruited from 87 hospitals in 14 countries. Before discharge, eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1), stratified by left ventricular ejection fraction (≤40% vs >40%) and country, with blocks of size 30 within strata and randomly ordered sub-blocks of 2, 4, and 6, to either usual care or high-intensity care. Usual care followed usual local practice, and high-intensity care involved the up-titration of treatments to 100% of recommended doses within 2 weeks of discharge and four scheduled outpatient visits over the 2 months after discharge that closely monitored clinical status, laboratory values, and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) concentrations. The primary endpoint was 180-day readmission to hospital due to heart failure or all-cause death. Efficacy and safety were assessed in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population (ie, all patients validly randomly assigned to treatment). The primary endpoint was assessed in all patients enrolled at hospitals that followed up patients to day 180. Because of a protocol amendment to the primary endpoint, the results of patients enrolled on or before this amendment were down-weighted. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03412201, and is now complete.Findings Between May 10, 2018, and Sept 23, 2022, 1641 patients were screened and 1078 were successfully randomly assigned to high-intensity care (n=542) or usual care (n=536; ITT population). Mean age was 63·0 years (SD 13·6), 416 (39%) of 1078 patients were female, 662 (61%) were male, 832 (77%) were White or Caucasian, 230 (21%) were Black, 12 (1%) were other races, one (<1%) was Native American, and one (<1%) was Pacific Islander (two [<1%] had missing data on race). The study was stopped early per the data and safety monitoring board's recommendation because of greater than expected between-group differences. As of data cutoff (Oct 13, 2022), by day 90, a higher proportion of patients in the high-intensity care group had been up-titrated to full doses of prescribed drugs (renin-angiotensin blockers 278 [55%] of 505 vs 11 [2%] of 497; β blockers 249 [49%] vs 20 [4%]; and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists 423 [84%] vs 231 [46%]). By day 90, blood pressure, pulse, New York Heart Association class, bodyweight, and NT-proBNP concentration had decreased more in the high-intensity care group than in the usual care group. Heart failure readmission or all-cause death up to day 180 occurred in 74 (15·2% down-weighted adjusted Kaplan-Meier estimate) of 506 patients in the high-intensity care group and 109 (23·3%) of 502 patients in the usual care group (adjusted risk difference 8·1% [95% CI 2·9-13·2]; p=0·0021; risk ratio 0·66 [95% CI 0·50-0·86]). More adverse events by 90 days occurred in the high-intensity care group (223 [41%] of 542) than in the usual care group (158 [29%] of 536) but similar incidences of serious adverse events (88 [16%] vs 92 [17%]) and fatal adverse events (25 [5%] vs 32 [6%]) were reported in each group.Interpretation An intensive treatment strategy of rapid up-titration of guideline-directed medication and close follow-up after an acute heart failure admission was readily accepted by patients because it reduced symptoms, improved quality of life, and reduced the risk of 180-day all-cause death or heart failure readmission compared with usual care.Funding Roche Diagnostics.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(22)02076-1

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 32 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Mebazaa, A., Davison, B., Chioncel, O., Cohen-Solal, A., Diaz, R., Filippatos, G., Metra, M., Ponikowski, P., Sliwa, K., Voors, A. A., Edwards, C., Novosadova, M., Takagi, K., Damasceno, A., Saidu, H., Gayat, E., Pang, P. S., Celutkiene, J., & Cotter, G.
Affiliations
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy (RO)
  • National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
  • Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia (IT)
  • Wroclaw Medical University (PL)
  • University of Cape Town (ZA)
  • University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
  • Momentum Research (US)
  • Eduardo Mondlane University (MZ)
  • Bayero University Kano (NG)
  • Indiana University Indianapolis (US)
Corresponding author
Mebazaa, Alexandre
ORCID
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-12
Volume
400
Issue
10367
Pages
1938-1952
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
DOI
10.1016/s0140-6736(22)02076-1
OpenAlex
W4308471536
Cited by
1,123
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 293 · 2025: 311 · 2024: 289 · 2023: 223 · 2022: 6
FWCI
144.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • The Lancet (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Brescia) (submittedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Roche Diagnostics Corp
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart rate and cardiovascular health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
Keywords
acute heart failure, guideline-directed medical therapy, high-intensity care, heart failure readmission, all-cause mortality, NT-proBNP, left ventricular ejection fraction, outpatient monitoring, hospital discharge, drug safety and tolerability, heart failure pharmacotherapy
MeSH terms
Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists, Female, Heart Failure, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Stroke Volume, Ventricular Function, Left, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review