Cited by 110Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchDiabetes Treatment and Management

Efficacy and safety of oral semaglutide 14 mg (flexible dose) in early-stage symptomatic Alzheimer's disease (evoke and evoke+): two phase 3, randomised, placebo-controlled trials

Open access
Cummings, Jeffrey L, Atri, Alireza, Sano, Mary, Zetterberg, Henrik, Scheltens, Philip, Knop, Filip K, Johannsen, Peter, Wichmann, Christian A +3 more·2026·The Lancet

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Evidence, including animal, clinical, and real-world studies in individuals with type 2 diabetes and/or obesity, suggests reduced risk of dementia and Alzheimer's disease after GLP-1 receptor agonist exposure. The evoke and evoke+ trials aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of oral semaglutide in individuals with early Alzheimer's disease. METHODS: evoke and evoke+ were multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trials conducted across 566 sites in 40 countries. The trials assessed the efficacy and safety of oral semaglutide up to 14 mg once daily in participants with amyloid-confirmed Alzheimer's disease, aged 55-85 years, with mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia due to Alzheimer's disease. In evoke+, participants with significant small vessel pathology were included. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to once-daily semaglutide 14 mg (flexible dose) or placebo for up to 156 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) score from baseline to week 104, assessed in all randomised participants. Safety was assessed in all randomised participants and reported for those receiving at least one dose of study drug. These trials were registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04777396 and NCT04777409); both trials have been discontinued due to negative clinical outcome. FINDINGS: Between May 18, 2021, and Sept 8, 2023, 9981 participants were screened, of whom 3808 were randomly assigned; 1855 in evoke (semaglutide, n=928; placebo, n=927) and 1953 in evoke+ (semaglutide, n=976; placebo, n=977). Mean age was 72·2 years (SD 7·1), and mean CDR-SB score was 3·7 (SD 1·6) at baseline. In evoke+, 54 (2·8%) participants had small vessel pathology. In evoke and evoke+, mean changes in CDR-SB score from baseline to week 104 were 2·3 (SE 0·1) and 2·2 (0·1) with semaglutide, compared with 2·3 (0·1) and 2·1 (0·1) with placebo (estimated difference -0·08 [95% CI -0·35 to 0·20], p=0·57 in evoke and 0·10 [-0·17 to 0·38], p=0·46 in evoke+). Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 1729 (91·2%) of 1896 participants receiving semaglutide versus 1613 (84·8%) of 1902 receiving placebo. There were five fatalities considered treatment-related by the investigators (one in the semaglutide group and four in the placebo group). INTERPRETATION: Oral semaglutide was not efficacious in slowing clinical progression in participants with early Alzheimer's disease. Safety and tolerability of semaglutide in early Alzheimer's disease is consistent with studies in other indications. FUNDING: Novo Nordisk.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(26)00459-9

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Cummings, J. L., Atri, A., Sano, M., Zetterberg, H., Scheltens, P., Knop, F. K., Johannsen, P., Wichmann, C. A., Abschneider, R. M., Leon, T., & Feldman, H. H.
Affiliations
  • University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US)
  • Banner Sun Health Research Institute (US)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL)
  • Novo Nordisk (Denmark) (DK)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Feldman, Howard H
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2026-05
Volume
407
Issue
10544
Pages
2167-2179
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W7139011201
Cited by
110
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 110
FWCI
408.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Novo Nordisk A/S
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
semaglutide, Alzheimer's disease, GLP-1 receptor agonists, oral semaglutide, early Alzheimer's disease, mild cognitive impairment, mild dementia, CDR-SB, amyloid, cognitive decline, drug safety, trial discontinuation, dementia prevention, type 2 diabetes
MeSH terms
Semaglutide, Administration, Oral, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Double-Blind Method, Glucagon-Like Peptides, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Treatment Outcome, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review