Cited by 80

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

PRIMARY FOCAL IMPACT DAMAGE TO THE BRAINSTEM IN BLUNT HEAD INJURIES DOES IT EXIST ?

Mitchell, DorothyE., Hume Adams, J.·1973·The Lancet

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(73)93128-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Johnston, 1970, Lancet, ii, 433, 10.1016/S0140-6736(70)90054-1 · DOI
  2. Jennett, 1972, Lancet, i, 733
  3. Strich, 1956, J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiat., 19, 163, 10.1136/jnnp.19.3.163 · DOI
  4. Strich, 1961, Lancet, ii, 443, 10.1016/S0140-6736(61)92426-6 · DOI
  5. Oppenheimer, 1968, Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiat., 31, 299, 10.1136/jnnp.31.4.299 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Tomlinson, 1970, J. clin. Path., 23, 154, 10.1136/jcp.s3-4.1.154 · DOI
  7. Nevin, 1967, J. Neuropath. exp. Neurol., 26, 77, 10.1097/00005072-196701000-00006 · DOI
  8. Peerless, 1967, Can. med. Ass. J., 96, 577
  9. Brierley, 1971, Lancet, ii, 560
  10. Graham, 1971, Lancet, i, 265, 10.1016/S0140-6736(71)91003-8 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Mitchell, D., & Hume Adams, J.
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1973-08
Volume
302
Issue
7823
Pages
215-218
ISSN
0140-6736
Cited by
80
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review