The DOI matches its Crossref record.
TRANSLUMINAL DILATATION OF CORONARY-ARTERY STENOSIS
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A Randomized Trial Comparing Coronary Angioplasty with Coronary Bypass Surgery
King, S. B., Lembo, N. J., Weintraub, W. S., Kosinski, A. S., Barnhart, H. X., Kutner, M. H., Alazraki, N. P., Guyton, R. A., & Zhao, X.-Q. (1994) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199410203311602 · Cited by 734
Assessing the Gold Standard — Lessons from the History of RCTs
Bothwell, L. E., Greene, J. A., Podolsky, S. H., & Jones, D. S. (2016) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmms1604593 · Cited by 664
Hong, Y. J., Jeong, H., Cho, K. W., Lu, N., & Kim, D. (2019) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201808247 · Cited by 559
Drug/device combinations for local drug therapies and infection prophylaxis
Wu, P., & Grainger, D. W. (2006) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.11.031 · Cited by 491
Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty
Landau, C., Lange, R. A., & Hillis, L. D. (1994) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199404073301407 · Cited by 445
Metadata
- Authors
- Grüntzig, A.
- Venue
- The Lancet
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1978-02
- Volume
- 311
- Issue
- 8058
- Pages
- 263
- ISSN
- 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
- 0140-6736
- OpenAlex
- W2037516909
- Cited by
- 1,343
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 31.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: TRANSLUMINAL DILATATION OF CORONARY-ARTERY STENOSIS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0140-6736(78)90500-7
- The paper
- Grüntzig, A. (1978). TRANSLUMINAL DILATATION OF CORONARY-ARTERY STENOSIS. The Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(78)90500-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
