Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 59

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

HFRS OUTBREAK ASSOCIATED WITH LABORATORY RATS IN UK

Lloyd, Graham, Bowen, E.T.W, Jones, Nicky, Pendry, Ann·1984·The Lancet

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(84)91413-2

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 12 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Op Ganda, S. Srikanta, Sj Brink, Re Gleason, Js Soeldner, Gs Eisenbarth, Differential sensitivity to beta cell secretagogues in "early" type I diabetes mellitus, Diabetes ((in press)).
  2. S. Srikanta, Op Ganda, Re Gleason, Ra Jackson, Js Soeldner, Gs Eisenbarth, Pre-type I diabetes: Linear loss of beta cell response to intravenous glucose, Diabetes ((in press)).
  3. S. Srikanta, Op Ganda, Ra Jackson, et al., Pre-type I diabetes: Common endocrinologic course despite immunologic and immunogenetic heterogeneity, Diabetologia ((in press)).

Cited by

See all 59

Metadata

Authors
Lloyd, G., Bowen, E. T. W., Jones, N., & Pendry, A.
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1984-05
Volume
323
Issue
8387
Pages
1175-1176
ISSN
0140-6736
Cited by
59
References
12
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: HFRS OUTBREAK ASSOCIATED WITH LABORATORY RATS IN UK. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0140-6736(84)91413-2
The paper
Lloyd, G., Bowen, E. T. W., Jones, N., & Pendry, A. (1984). HFRS OUTBREAK ASSOCIATED WITH LABORATORY RATS IN UK. The Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(84)91413-2

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.