Cited by 447Chronic Kidney Disease and DiabetesDiabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Effect of two years of strict metabolic control on progression of incipient nephropathy in insulin-dependent diabetes

Feldt-Rasmussen, Bo, Mathiesen, ElisabethR., Deckert, Torsten·1986·The Lancet

Abstract

36 patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus who had 'Albustix'-negative urine but raised urinary albumin excretion (30 to 300 mg/24 h) were randomly assigned to either remaining on conventional insulin treatment or continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion and followed up for 2 years. The insulin-infusion group showed a significant, sustained improvement in metabolic control, with a median glycosylated haemoglobin of 7.2% (range 5.9-8.8), but there was no change in the conventional-treatment group (median 8.6%, range 7.2-13.4) (p less than 0.001). Clinical diabetic nephropathy (a urinary albumin excretion rate above 300 mg/24 h in at least two of three 24 h urine collections) developed in 5 patients in the conventional-treatment group, but not in the insulin-infusion group (p less than 0.05, two-tailed). Fractional albumin clearance (mean and range X 10(7] increased in the conventional-treatment group from 160 (35-468) to 360 (29-1580) and was unchanged in the insulin-infusion group (170 [31-608] before to 160 [26-460] after) (p less than 0.05). Insulin infusion had an overall beneficial effect on the annual increase in urinary albumin excretion (p less than 0.05), and the mean glycosylated haemoglobin values correlated positively with annual change in albumin excretion (r = 0.57, p less than 0.0001). The diastolic blood pressure rose significantly in the conventional-treatment group (p less than 0.001), and annual change in mean blood pressure correlated with change…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(86)91433-9

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In clinical trials, targeting lower HbA1c levels has reduced the rates of chronic diabetes complications in patients with T1D or T2D.

    “Moreover, in clinical trials, targeting lower HbA1c levels has reduced the rates of chronic diabetes complications in patients with T1D 190,232 -238 or T2D. 239 -246”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Feldt-Rasmussen, B., Mathiesen, E., & Deckert, T.
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1986-12
Volume
328
Issue
8519
Pages
1300-1304
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2088865109
Cited by
447
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
34.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
type 1 diabetes, diabetic nephropathy, metabolic control, insulin pump therapy, insulin therapy, urinary albumin excretion, glycosylated haemoglobin, blood pressure, disease progression
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Albuminuria, Blood Glucose, Clinical Trials as Topic, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetic Nephropathies, Follow-Up Studies, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Infusions, Parenteral, Insulin, Insulin Infusion Systems, Middle Aged, Random Allocation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review