CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 12

Lancet helpers, 1993

Fox, Robin·1994·The Lancet
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)90873-7
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)90873-7

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Jobst et al. used CT, oriented images in a tilted axial plane, and made a single linear measurement of the minimum thickness of each medial temporal lobe.

    “Jobst et al [37] used CT, the images were oriented in a tilted axial plane, and a single linear measurement of the minimum thickness of each medial temporal lobe was made.”

    From Rate of medial temporal lobe atrophy in typical aging and Alzheimer's disease (1998) · cites this paper as [37]

  • The annualized rate of hippocampal volume loss in our AD patients (3.98%/yr) was smaller than the 15%/yr reported by Jobst et al.

    “The annualized rate of hippocampal volume loss in our group of AD patients, 3.98%/yr ±1.92%, was smaller than reported by Jobst et al [37] which was 15%/yr.”

    From Rate of medial temporal lobe atrophy in typical aging and Alzheimer's disease (1998) · cites this paper as [37]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Fox, R.
Corresponding author
Fox, Robin
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1994-01
Volume
343
Issue
8888
Pages
8
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
DOI
10.1016/s0140-6736(94)90873-7
OpenAlex
W2095258214
Cited by
12
References
0
Citations by year
2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2013: 1
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
The Lancet (publishedVersion)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review