Cited by 339Pain Management and Placebo EffectStatistical Methods in Clinical TrialsHistorical Medical Research and Treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

‘Powerful Placebo: The Dark Side of the Randomised Controlled Trial’

Kaptchuk, Ted J·1998·The Lancet

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(97)10111-8

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 44 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Anon, 1885, Placebos, Med Record, 27, 576
  2. Pepper, 1945, A note on the placebo, Am J Pharm, 117, 409
  3. Anon, 1954, The humble humbug, Lancet, ii, 321
  4. Liberman, 1967, The elusive placebo reactor, Neuropsychopharm, 5, 557
  5. Beecher, 1953, The effectiveness of placebo “reactors” and “non-reactors”, J Pharmacol Exp Ther, 109, 393
  6. Evans, 1974, The placebo response in pain reduction, Adv Neurology, 4, 289
  7. Kaptchuk, 1997, Legitimate evidence: randomized or otherwise, Advances, 13, 48

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–338 of 338

Metadata

Authors
Kaptchuk, T. J.
Affiliations
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Kaptchuk, Ted J
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-06
Volume
351
Issue
9117
Pages
1722-1725
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2146129917
Cited by
339
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 18
FWCI
5.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Fetzer Institute
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (U24 AR3441)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Historical Medical Research and Treatments
Keywords
placebo, placebo effect, placebo ethics, efficacy evaluation
MeSH terms
Double-Blind Method, Ethics, Medical, Humans, Placebos, Placebo Effect, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Risk Assessment, Paternalism, Control Groups, Research Subjects, Biomedical Research, History, 20th Century

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review