Cited by 177Vibration Control and Rheological FluidsStructural Engineering and Vibration AnalysisSeismic and Structural Analysis of Tall Buildings

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mass dampers and their optimal designs for building vibration control

Chang, C.C.·1999·Engineering Structures

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0141-0296(97)00213-7

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Ormondroyd, 1928, The theory of the dynamic vibration absorber, Trans. ASME, 49, 50, A9
  2. Holmes, 1995, List of installations, Engineering Structures, 17, 676, 10.1016/0141-0296(95)90027-6 · DOI
  3. Fujino, 1993, Design formulas for tuned mass dampers based on a perturbation technique, J. of Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 22, 833, 10.1002/eqe.4290221002 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Xu, 1992, Dynamic characteristics of multiple substructures with closely spaced frequencies, J. of Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 21, 1059, 10.1002/eqe.4290211203 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Yamaguchi, 1993, Fundamental characteristics of multiple tuned mass dampers for suppressing harmonically forced oscillation, J. of Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 22, 51, 10.1002/eqe.4290220105 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Abé, 1995, Tuned mass dampers for structures with closely spaced natural frequencies, J. of Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 24, 247, 10.1002/eqe.4290240209 · DOI
  7. Banning, 1966, Apparatus for demonstrating dynamics of sloshing liquids, Bulletin Mechanical Engineering Education, 5, 65
  8. Tamura, 1995, Effectiveness of tuned liquid dampers under wind excitation, Engineering Structures, 17, 609, 10.1016/0141-0296(95)00031-2 · DOI
  9. Modi, 1995, Control of wind-induced instabilities through application of nutation dampers: a brief overview, Engineering Structures, 17, 626, 10.1016/0141-0296(95)00033-4 · DOI
  10. Balendra, 1995, Effectiveness of tuned liquid column dampers for vibration control of towers, Engineering Structures, 17, 668, 10.1016/0141-0296(95)00036-7 · DOI
  11. Watkins RD. Tests on a liquid column vibration absorber for tall structures, Proceedings of the International Conference on Steel and Aluminum Structures, Singapore, 1991.
  12. Watkins RD, Hitchcock PA. Tests on various liquid column vibration absorbers, Proceedings of International Conference on Motion and Vibration Control, Yokohama, 1130-1134, 1992.
  13. Hitchcock, 1996, Characteristics of liquid column vibration absorbers (LCVA) - I, Engineering Structures, 18, 126
  14. Hitchcock, 1996, Characteristics of liquid column vibration absorbers (LCVA) - II, Engineering Structures, 18, 135
  15. Gao, 1997, Optimization of tuned liquid column dampers, Engineering Structures, 19, 476, 10.1016/S0141-0296(96)00099-5 · DOI
  16. Chang, 1998, Control performance of liquid column vibration absorbers, Engineering Structures, 20, 580, 10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00062-X · DOI
  17. Sun, 1995, The properties of tuned liquid dampers using a TMD analogy, J. of Earthquake and Structural Dynamics, 24, 967, 10.1002/eqe.4290240704 · DOI
  18. Chang, 1998, Control of buildings using single and multiple tuned liquid column dampers, Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 6, 77, 10.12989/sem.1998.6.1.077 · DOI
  19. Haroun, 1996, Suppression of environmentally-induced vibration in tall buildings by hybrid liquid column dampers, The Structural Design of Tall Buildings, 5, 45, 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1794(199603)5:1<45::AID-TAL58>3.0.CO;2-F · DOI
  20. Abé M, Kimura S, Fujino Y. Control laws for semi-active tuned liquid column damper with variable orifice openings, Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Structural Control on Next Generation of Intelligent Structures, 18-21 December 1996, HKUST, Hong Kong, 5-10.
  21. Crandall SH, Mark WD. Random vibration in mechanical systems, Academic Press, Inc. San Diego, California, 1963.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Chang, C. C.
Affiliations
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HK)
Corresponding author
Chang, C.C.
Venue
Engineering Structures
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-05
Volume
21
Issue
5
Pages
454-463
ISSN
0141-0296 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2007732071
Cited by
177
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 6
FWCI
8.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Engineering Structures (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Seismic and Structural Analysis of Tall Buildings
Keywords
mass damper, building vibration control, tuned mass damper, tuned liquid column damper, optimal damper design, efficiency index, wind loads, seismic loading, white noise excitation, control efficiency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review