Cited by 78Vibration Control and Rheological FluidsFluid Dynamics and Vibration AnalysisStructural Engineering and Vibration Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A tuned mass damper for suppressing the coupled flexural and torsional buffeting response of long-span bridges

Lin, Yuh-Yi, Cheng, Chii-Ming, Lee, Chung-Hau·2000·Engineering Structures

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0141-0296(99)00049-8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Huffmann G, Freeman RA, Brown CW. Dao Khanong cable stayed bridge: tuned mass dampers in deck and pylon, Proceedings of International Conference on Cable Stayed Bridges, Bangkok, 1987:1485–93.
  2. Malhortra PK, Wieland M. Tuned mass damper for suppressing wind effects in a cable-stayed bridge, Proceedings of International Conference on Cable Stayed Bridges, Bangkok, 1987:557–68.
  3. Honda, 1993, Aerodynamic stability of Kansai international airport access bridge, Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 49, 533, 10.1016/0167-6105(93)90047-R · DOI
  4. Nobuto, 1988, A study on the effectiveness of TMD to suppress a coupled flutter of bridge deck, Journal of JSCE, October, 413
  5. Gu, 1992, Optimization of TMD for suppressing buffeting response of long-span bridges, Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 41–44, 1383, 10.1016/0167-6105(92)90146-2 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Peil, 1995, Aerodynamic stability analysis of cable-stayed bridges, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 121, 1784, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1995)121:12(1784) · DOI
  7. Jain, 1996, Coupled flutter and buffeting analysis of long-span bridges, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 122, 716, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1996)122:7(716) · DOI
  8. Miyata, 1990, Coupled flutter estimate of a suspension bridge, Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 33, 341, 10.1016/0167-6105(90)90049-I · DOI
  9. Tanaka, 1992, Coupled mode flutter analysis using flutter derivatives, Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 41-44, 1279, 10.1016/0167-6105(92)90135-W · DOI
  10. Scanlan, 1971, Airfoil and bridge deck flutter derivatives, Journal of Engineering Mechanics Division, ASCE, 97, 1717, 10.1061/JMCEA3.0001526 · DOI
  11. Gu, 1994, A practical method of TMD for suppressing wind-induced vertical buffeting of long-span cable-stayed bridges and its application, Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 51, 203, 10.1016/0167-6105(94)90004-3 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Lin, Y.-Y., Cheng, C.-M., & Lee, C.-H.
Affiliations
Tamkang University (TW)
Corresponding author
Lin, Yuh-Yi
Venue
Engineering Structures
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-09
Volume
22
Issue
9
Pages
1195-1204
ISSN
0141-0296 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2049195415
Cited by
78
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
7.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Engineering Structures (publishedVersion)
  • Tamkang University Institutional Repository (TKUIR) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Science Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Fluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
Keywords
tuned mass damper, buffeting response, long-span bridges, flexural-torsional coupling, aerodynamic coupling, flutter, critical speed, structural damping, damper design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review