The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Physical properties and biodegradability of maleated-polycaprolactone/starch composite
Open accessAbstract
The properties of blends of polycaprolactone and starch (PCL/starch) and maleic anhydride (MAH)-grafted-polycaprolactone and starch (PCL-g-MAH/starch) were examined using Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (1H NMR), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and mechanical testing. Mechanical and thermal properties of PCL became noticeably worse when it was blended with starch, due to the poor compatibility between the two phases. The greater compatibility of PCL-g-MAH with starch, owing to the formation of an ester carbonyl group, led to a much better dispersion and homogeneity of starch in the PCL-g-MAH matrix and consequently to noticeably better properties. Furthermore, with a lower melt temperature, the PCL-g-MAH/starch blend is more easily processed than PCL/starch. Both blends were buried in soil to assess biodegradability. Water resistance of PCL-g-MAH/starch was higher than that of PCL/starch, although weight loss of blends buried in soil indicated that both were biodegradable, even at high levels of starch substitution. In soil, the mechanical properties of both blends, such as tensile strength and elongation at break, also deteriorated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Biodegradable blends and composites of polycaprolactone and starch derivatives
Koenig, M. F., & Huang, S. J. (1995) · Polymer · doi:10.1016/0032-3861(95)90934-t · Cited by 336
Cao, A. (2002) · Polymer · doi:10.1016/s0032-3861(01)00658-9 · Cited by 108
Cited by
Biodegradable compatibilized polymer blends for packaging applications: A literature review
Muthuraj, R., Misra, M., & Mohanty, A. K. (2018) · Journal of Applied Polymer Science · doi:10.1002/app.45726 · Cited by 391
Kim, H.-S., Kim, H.-J., Lee, J.-W., & Choi, I.-G. (2006) · Polymer Degradation and Stability · doi:10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.07.002 · Cited by 271
Polycaprolactone/starch composite: Fabrication, structure, properties, and applications
Ali Akbari Ghavimi, S., Ebrahimzadeh, M. H., Solati-Hashjin, M., & Abu Osman, N. A. (2015) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A · doi:10.1002/jbm.a.35371 · Cited by 151
Pramod, K., Suneesh, C. V., Shanavas, S., Ansari, S. H., & Ali, J. (2015) · Journal of Analytical Science and Technology · doi:10.1186/s40543-015-0073-2 · Cited by 139
Degradation of a Polycaprolactone/Eggshell Biocomposite in a Bioreactor
González Petit, M., Correa, Z., & Sabino, M. A. (2015) · Journal of Polymers and the Environment · doi:10.1007/s10924-014-0655-x · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Wu, C.-S.
- Venue
- Polymer Degradation and Stability
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 127-134
- ISSN
- 0141-3910 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2049112198
- Cited by
- 250
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Physical properties and biodegradability of maleated-polycaprolactone/starch composite. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0141-3910(02)00393-2
- The paper
- Wu, C.-S. (2003). Physical properties and biodegradability of maleated-polycaprolactone/starch composite. Polymer Degradation and Stability. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0141-3910(02)00393-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.