Cited by 126Electrochemical sensors and biosensorsHydrogels: synthesis, properties, applicationsTissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine

Biocompatible, glucose-permeable hydrogel for in situ coating of implantable biosensors

Quinn, Christopher A.P., Connor, Robert E., Heller, Adam·1997·Biomaterials

Abstract

A glucose-permeable hydrogel (97% water by mass) was formed by cross-linking an 8-armed, amine-terminated poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) derivative with a di-succinimidyl ester of an alpha,omega-dipropionic acid derivative of PEG in aqueous solution at room temperature. The gel was evaluated as a biocompatible interface between an amperometric glucose electrode and the subcutaneous tissue of a rat. Over a glucose concentration range of 0-30 mM, the loss in sensitivity to glucose caused by the application of the hydrogel was 34% and the reduction in limiting current at high glucose concentration (30 mM) was 35% at 37 degrees C for films that were approximately 0.06 mm thick, an acceptable loss. Hydrogel and Pellethane samples were subcutaneously implanted in male Sprague-Dawley rats for 7 days. The explanted samples were thin-sectioned, stained and examined under a light microscope. While the Pellethane samples were encapsulated with tissue consisting of macrophages, neutrophils, foreign body giant cells, fibroblasts and collagen, the PEG samples had very few adherent cells. The results show this system to be a good candidate for providing biocompatible interfaces for sensors, especially oxidoreductase-based sensors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0142-9612(97)00125-7

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pellethane control substrates showed significant inflammatory cell adherence and collagen encapsulation, whereas PEG-modified hydrogels had fewer cells, indicating improved biocompatibility.

    “While Pellethane (i.e., polyurethane) control substrates exhibited significant inflammatory cell adherence and collagen encapsulation, PEG-modified hydrogels were characterized by less cells indicating improved biocompatibility.144”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 33 · Cited by 126

Authors
Quinn, C. A. P., Connor, R. E., & Heller, A.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Corresponding author
Heller, Adam
Venue
Biomaterials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-12
Volume
18
Issue
24
Pages
1665-1670
ISSN
0142-9612 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1998734017
Cited by
126
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 9
FWCI
2.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biomaterials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01dk042015-07)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK42015)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electrochemical sensors and biosensors
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
Keywords
implantable biosensors, biocompatibility, subcutaneous implantation, foreign body reaction, glucose sensitivity
MeSH terms
Animals, Biocompatible Materials, Cell Adhesion, Cross-Linking Reagents, Coloring Agents, Electrodes, Implanted, Gels, Glucose, Male, Polyethylene Glycols, Polyurethanes, Succinimides, Biosensing Techniques, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Hydrogel, Polyethylene Glycol Dimethacrylate, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review