The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evaluation of chemical coagulation–flocculation aids for the removal of suspended solids and phosphorus from intensive recirculating aquaculture effluent discharge
Open accessAbstract
An evaluation of two commonly used coagulation–flocculation aids (alum and ferric chloride) was conducted for the supernatant overflow from settling cones used to treat the effluent from microscreen filters in an intensive recirculating aquaculture system. In addition to determining the effectiveness of these aids in removing both suspended solids and phosphorus, a systematic testing of the variables normally encountered in the coagulation–flocculation process was performed. Tests were carried out to evaluate the dosages and conditions (mixing and flocculation stirring speeds, durations, and settling times) required to achieve optimum waste capture. The orthophosphate removal efficiency for alum and ferric chloride were 89 and 93%, respectively, at a dosage of 90 mg/l. Optimum turbidity removal was achieved with a 60 mg/l dosage for both alum and ferric chloride. Both alum and ferric chloride demonstrated excellent removal of suspended solids from initial TSS values of approximately 100–10 mg/l at a dosage of 90 mg/l. Flocculation and mixing speed played only a minor role in the removal efficiencies for both orthophosphates and suspended solids. Both coagulation–flocculation aids also exhibited excellent settling characteristics, with the majority of the floc quickly settling out in the first 5 min.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Recent Advancement of Coagulation–Flocculation and Its Application in Wastewater Treatment
Teh, C. Y., Budiman, P. M., Shak, K. P. Y., & Wu, T. Y. (2016) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.5b04703 · Cited by 1,160
Waste treatment in recirculating aquaculture systems
van Rijn, J. (2013) · Aquacultural Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.aquaeng.2012.11.010 · Cited by 414
Phosphate removal and recovery with a synthetic hydrotalcite as an adsorbent
Kuzawa, K., Jung, Y.-J., Kiso, Y., Yamada, T., Nagai, M., & Lee, T.-G. (2006) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.04.015 · Cited by 255
Microalgae-associated bacteria play a key role in the flocculation of Chlorella vulgaris
Lee, J., Cho, D.-H., Ramanan, R., Kim, B.-H., Oh, H.-M., & Kim, H.-S. (2013) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2012.11.130 · Cited by 238
Metadata
- Authors
- Ebeling, J. M., Sibrell, P. L., Ogden, S. R., & Summerfelt, S. T.
- Venue
- Aquacultural Engineering
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-10
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 23-42
- ISSN
- 0144-8609 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2135157483
- Cited by
- 278
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of chemical coagulation–flocculation aids for the removal of suspended solids and phosphorus from intensive recirculating aquaculture effluent discharge. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0144-8609(03)00029-3
- The paper
- Ebeling, J. M., Sibrell, P. L., Ogden, S. R., & Summerfelt, S. T. (2003). Evaluation of chemical coagulation–flocculation aids for the removal of suspended solids and phosphorus from intensive recirculating aquaculture effluent discharge. Aquacultural Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0144-8609(03)00029-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.