The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Communicating trustworthiness and building trust in interorganizational virtual organizations
Abstract
We propose a theory of trust in 1nterorganizational virtual organizations that focuses on how trustworthiness can be communicated and trust built in this environment. The theory highlights three issues that must be dealt with if the potential obstacles to the development of trust in the virtual context are to be overcome. These are communication of trustworthiness facilitated by reliable Information and Communication Technology (ICT), establishment of a common business understanding, and strong business ethics. We propose four specific propositions relating to these issues, and suggest topics to be explored in future research.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“trust is key to holding employees together as a cohesive unit (Kasper-Fuehrer & Ashkanasy, 2001;Bijlsma & Koopman, 2003).”
From Antecedents of Team Creativity: An Examination of Team Emotional Intelligence, Team Trust and Collaborative Culture (2010) · cites this paper as Kasper-Fuehrer & Ashkanasy, 2001
Citations
Cites
Swift Trust and Temporary Groups
Meyerson, D., Weick, K. E., & Kramer, R. M. (1996) · Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research · doi:10.4135/9781452243610.n9 · Cited by 1,982 · cited 4×
“The concept of trust in collaborative virtual partnerships is therefore more than just “swift trust” based on immediate stereotypical impression (Jarvenpaa & Leidner, 1998; Meyerson et al., 1996).”
BackgroundInfluentialCommunicative facial displays as a new conversational modality
Takeuchi, A., & Nagao, K. (1993) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '93 · doi:10.1145/169059.169156 · Cited by 140
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Leading virtual teams: Hierarchical leadership, structural supports, and shared team leadership.
Hoch, J. E., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2014) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0030264 · Cited by 657
Barczak, G., Lassk, F., & Mulki, J. (2010) · Creativity and Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00574.x · Cited by 479
Blockchain Technology as Economic Infrastructure: Revisiting the Electronic Markets Hypothesis
Berg, C., Davidson, S., & Potts, J. (2019) · Frontiers in Blockchain · doi:10.3389/fbloc.2019.00022 · Cited by 67
Metadata
- Authors
- Kasper-Fuehrer, E.
- Venue
- Journal of Management
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2001-05-06
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 235-254
- ISSN
- 0149-2063
- Cited by
- 103
- References
- 2
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
