The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Development of a Systematic, Aggregate Measure of Corporate Social Performance
Abstract
Individuals, groups, and government units have developed considerable interested in evaluating the social performance of corporations. Evaluating corporate social performance (CSP) is important for researchers investigating the relationship between different organizational measures and CSP and for stakeholders employing social performance information in their decision making models. To assess CSP, an aggregate measure of CSP which incorporates both an independent assessment of actual performance and the individual value judgements of the stakeholder is needed. In this study, we propose a methodology for the development of a systematic measure of CSP using the Analytic Hierarchy Process. This multi-criteria decision making technique allows for the conversion of a multidimensional scale to a unidimensional scale, enabling analysis/comparison of companies both within the same industry and across industries. The technique is illustrated by developing a measure of CSP using several types of managers. The results indicate that there are large rank changes when individual value judgements are incorporated using relative importance weights.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1914185 · Cited by 48,524
The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.
Miller, G. A. (1956) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0043158 · Cited by 17,812
A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance
Carroll, A. B. (1979) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/257850 · Cited by 10,480
Cited by
De Bakker, F. G. A., Groenewegen, P., & Den Hond, F. (2005) · Business & Society · doi:10.1177/0007650305278086 · Cited by 1,085
Ruf, B. M., Muralidhar, K., Brown, R. M., Janney, J. J., & Paul, K. (2001) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1023/a:1010786912118 · Cited by 962
Self-citationCorporate reputation: A combination of social responsibility and industry
Melo, T., & Garrido‐Morgado, A. (2012) · Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management · doi:10.1002/csr.260 · Cited by 476
Morioka, S. N., & de Carvalho, M. M. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.104 · Cited by 347
Measuring Corporate Social Responsibility for competitive success at a regional level
Gallardo-Vázquez, D., & Sanchez-Hernandez, M. I. (2014) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.02.051 · Cited by 273
Metadata
- Authors
- Ruf, B. M., Muralidhar, K., & Paul, K.
- Venue
- Journal of Management
- Publisher
- SAGE Publishing
- Published
- 1998-01-01
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 119-133
- ISSN
- 0149-2063 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1992885729
- Cited by
- 191
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Development of a Systematic, Aggregate Measure of Corporate Social Performance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0149-2063(99)80056-7
- The paper
- Ruf, B. M., Muralidhar, K., & Paul, K. (1998). The Development of a Systematic, Aggregate Measure of Corporate Social Performance. Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0149-2063(99)80056-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.