Cited by 95Healthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsPsychiatric care and mental health servicesElectroconvulsive Therapy Studies

Impact of Coercion on Treatment Outcome

Kaltiala-Heino, Riittakerttu, Laippala, Pekka, Salokangas, Raimo K.R·1997·International Journal of Law and Psychiatry

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0160-2527(97)00013-7

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 23 · Cited by 95

Authors
Kaltiala-Heino, R., Laippala, P., & Salokangas, R. K. R.
Venue
International Journal of Law and Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-06
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
311-322
ISSN
0160-2527 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2075243832
Cited by
95
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Law and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
Keywords
involuntary psychiatric admission, patient experience, shared decision-making, patient voice, patient-staff relationships, coping strategies, care ethics, mental health reform, treatment outcomes
MeSH terms
Adult, Coercion, Commitment of Persons with Psychiatric Disorders, Commitment of Mentally Ill, Female, Finland, Follow-Up Studies, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Mental Health Services, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Psychotic Disorders, Severity of Illness Index, Confidence Intervals, Chi-Square Distribution, Logistic Models, Odds Ratio, Treatment Outcome, Persons with Psychiatric Disorders, Mentally Ill Persons

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review