Cited by 361Cognitive Abilities and TestingPsychometric Methodologies and TestingNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Reaction times and intelligence differences: a population-based cohort study.

Deary, I·2001·Intelligence

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0160-2896(01)00062-9

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 35 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 359

Metadata

Authors
Deary, I.
Affiliations
University of Edinburgh (GB)
Corresponding author
Deary, I
Venue
Intelligence
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-10
Volume
29
Issue
5
Pages
389-399
ISSN
0160-2896 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2029861863
Cited by
361
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 17
FWCI
8.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Intelligence (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
reaction time, psychometric intelligence, general intelligence, information processing theory, effect size, healthy population, within-person variability, sex differences, educational attainment, social class, older adults

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review