Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 254

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 111 of the 111 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Bioanalytical screening methods for dioxins and dioxin-like compounds — a review of bioassay/biomarker technology

Behnisch, Peter A, Hosoe, Kazunori, Sakai, Shin-ichi·2001·Environment International

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0160-4120(01)00028-9

Cites

111 of 111 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 111 references

Cited by

See all 254

Metadata

Authors
Behnisch, P. A., Hosoe, K., & Sakai, S.-I.
Venue
Environment International
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-11
Volume
27
Issue
5
Pages
413-439
ISSN
0160-4120 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2013025233
Cited by
254
References
111
FWCI
11.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bioanalytical screening methods for dioxins and dioxin-like compounds — a review of bioassay/biomarker technology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0160-4120(01)00028-9
The paper
Behnisch, P. A., Hosoe, K., & Sakai, S.-I. (2001). Bioanalytical screening methods for dioxins and dioxin-like compounds — a review of bioassay/biomarker technology. Environment International. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0160-4120(01)00028-9

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.