CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 6Academic Writing and PublishingAcademic integrity and plagiarismPublishing and Scholarly Communication

Checking Citations

Lichter, Paul R.·1989·Ophthalmology
DOI 10.1016/s0161-6420(89)32763-1
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0161-6420(89)32763-1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An inaccurate reference may be repeated throughout the literature, resulting in a lasting impact on the authors, journal, and field.

    “It is also possible that an inaccurate reference may be repeated throughout the literature (Biebuyek, 1992;Lichter, 1989), resulting in a lasting impact on the authors, journal, and field.”

    From Reference accuracy of primary studies published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals: A scoping review (2024) · cites this paper as Lichter, 1989

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Lichter, P. R.
Corresponding author
Lichter, Paul R.
ORCID
Lichter, Paul R.
Venue
Ophthalmology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1989-08
Volume
96
Issue
8
Pages
1131-1132
ISSN
0161-6420 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s0161-6420(89)32763-1
OpenAlex
W4236974182
Cited by
6
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Ophthalmology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Academic Writing and Publishing
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Academic integrity and plagiarism
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Publishing and Scholarly Communication
Keywords
citation accuracy, works cited, bibliographic verification, plagiarism, academic integrity, ophthalmology literature, citation errors, author responsibility
MeSH terms
Bibliographies as Topic, Documentation, Publishing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review