Cited by 227Retinal Diseases and TreatmentsRetinal Imaging and AnalysisDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Age-related maculopathy in a multiracial United States population

Klein, Ronald, Klein, Barbara E.K., Jensen, Susan C., Mares-Perlman, Julie A., Cruickshanks, Karen J., Palta, Mari·1999·Ophthalmology

Abstract

Objective To investigate the prevalence of and risk factors for age-related maculopathy (ARM) in three racial/ethnic groups: non-Hispanic whites, non-Hispanic blacks, and Mexican-Americans.Design A nationally representative population-based, cross-sectional study.Participants A total of 8270 persons 40 years of age or older, a sample of the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.Main outcome measures Age-related maculopathy was determined by the grading of fundus photographs using a standardized protocol.Results The prevalence of any ARM in the civilian noninstitutionalized United States population including those 40 years of age or older was 9.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.2, 10.6) as estimated from the sample. After adjusting for age, there was no difference in the prevalence of early ARM (defined largely by the presence of soft drusen) by ethnic/racial group. However, for the less frequent component lesions of early ARM (increased retinal pigment and retinal pigment epithelial depigmentation), the odds ratios (95% CIs) comparing non-Hispanic blacks to non-Hispanic whites were 0.47 (0.31, 0.74) and 0.59 (0.33, 1.04), respectively, and for comparing Mexican-Americans to non-Hispanic whites, they were 0.41 (0.21, 0.81) and 0.72 (0.44, 1.19), respectively. For late ARM, the odds ratio (95% CI) for non-Hispanic blacks compared to non-Hispanic whites was 0.34 (0.10, 1.18) and for Mexican-Americans compared to non-Hispanic whites, it was 0.25 (0.07, 0.90). Other than age, none of the personal, medical, or physiologic variables studied were statistically significantly associated with any of the ARM endpoints in any of the three races/ethnic groups.Conclusion Overall, rates of any ARM (including all early and late lesions) are not significantly different among non-Hispanic blacks, Mexican-Americans, and non-Hispanic whites. However, the rates of individual lesions suggest that non-Hispanic whites and Mexican-Americans may be protected against retinal pigment abnormalities and lesions associated with late ARM. There appears to be little influence of personal, medical, and environmental factors studied on these results. Further studies in larger populations of older persons in these ethnic groups would likely clarify these relations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0161-6420(99)90255-5

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Increased plasma fibrinogen is associated with increased risk of late AMD in cross-sectional studies (OR 1.45; 95% CI 1.22 - 1.73).

    “A significant increase in risk of late AMD with increased plasma fibrinogen was observed in two cross-sectional studies [58-60], (OR 1.45; 95% CI 1.22 - 1.73).”
  • Age-related macular degeneration is more common in white individuals than in people of other ethnic origin.

    “Age-related macular degeneration is more common in white individuals than in people of other ethnic origin.21,41,42”

    From Age-related macular degeneration (2008) · cites this paper as [41]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 34 · Cited by 227

Authors
Klein, R., Klein, B. E. K., Jensen, S. C., Mares-Perlman, J. A., Cruickshanks, K. J., & Palta, M.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Klein, Ronald
Venue
Ophthalmology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-06
Volume
106
Issue
6
Pages
1056-1065
ISSN
0161-6420 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W20523022
Cited by
227
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 6
FWCI
7.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ophthalmology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Public Health Service (200-89-7004)
  • National Eye Institute (EY O6594)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal Imaging and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
age-related maculopathy, prevalence, racial and ethnic differences, soft drusen, non-Hispanic blacks, Mexican Americans, non-Hispanic whites, risk factors, fundus photography grading, older adults
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Black or African American, Cross-Sectional Studies, Ethnicity, Female, Humans, Macular Degeneration, Male, Middle Aged, Nutrition Surveys, Population Surveillance, Risk Factors, United States, Prevalence, Odds Ratio, Mexican Americans, Black People, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review