Cited by 75Multisensory perception and integrationChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentTactile and Sensory Interactions

Intermodal exploration and knowledge in infancy

Spelke, Elizabeth S., Owsley, Cynthia J.·1979·Infant Behavior and Development

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0163-6383(79)80004-1

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Infants are sensitive to spatial correspondences in audio and visual speech.

    “Early research showed that infants are sensitive to spatial correspondences in audio and visual speech”

    From The McGurk effect in infants (1997) · cites this paper as Spelke & Owsley, 1979

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spelke, E. S., & Owsley, C. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Cornell University (US)
Corresponding author
Spelke, Elizabeth S.
Venue
Infant Behavior and Development
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1979-01
Volume
2
Pages
13-27
ISSN
0163-6383 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2104284989
Cited by
75
References
17
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Infant Behavior and Development (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
infant face recognition, voice recognition, face-voice integration, audiovisual integration, object recognition, spatial-temporal information

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review