Cited by 313Chronic Disease Management StrategiesNursing Roles and PracticesPrimary Care and Health Outcomes

Rethinking practitioner roles in chronic illness: the specialist, primary care physician, and the practice nurse

Katon, Wayne, Von Korff, Michael, Lin, Elizabeth, Simon, Greg·2001·General Hospital Psychiatry

Abstract

In this article, we describe an evidence-based stepped care approach to improving the care of chronic illness in organized health care systems. We review the common principles that have been found to improve the management and outcomes of patients with major depression, asthma, diabetes, and congestive heart failure. These population-based methods to improve care of chronic illness require reorganizing the roles of specialists, primary care physicians, and nurses.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0163-8343(01)00136-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several patient, physician, and system barriers contribute to the underdiagnosis of anxiety and depression in patients with COPD.

    “Several patient, physician, and system barriers contribute to the underdiagnosis of these disorders in patients with COPD.”

    From Anxiety and Depression in COPD (2008) · cites this paper as [74]

  • The collaborative-care model has been found to be associated with marked improvements in the quality of depression care in primary care and significant improvement in depression outcomes.

    “In recent years, a model of care termed the collaborative-care model has been found to be associated with marked improvements in the quality of depression care in primary care and significant improvement in depression outcomes.74”

    From Anxiety and Depression in COPD (2008) · cites this paper as [74]

  • Patient barriers include lack of knowledge about the possibility of anxiety or depression and their treatment options.

    “Patient barriers include lack of knowledge about the possibility of anxiety or depression as well as their treatment options.”

    From Anxiety and Depression in COPD (2008) · cites this paper as [74]

  • There are several patient-, physician-, and system-level barriers to the detection and management of anxiety and depression in COPD.

    “There are several patient-, physician-, and system-level barriers74 (Table 6).”

    From Anxiety and Depression in COPD (2008) · cites this paper as [74]

  • Other patient barriers may include preference for depression care within the primary care system, and therapies that may be limited by insurance coverage or accessibility.

    “Other barriers may include preference for depression care within the primary care system, and therapies that may be limited by insurance coverage or accessibility.74”

    From Anxiety and Depression in COPD (2008) · cites this paper as [74]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 54 · Cited by 313

Authors
Katon, W., Von Korff, M., Lin, E., & Simon, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Group Health Cooperative (US)
Corresponding author
Katon, Wayne
Venue
General Hospital Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-05
Volume
23
Issue
3
Pages
138-144
ISSN
0163-8343 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1977581755
Cited by
313
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 15
FWCI
8.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • General Hospital Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH0-11643, MH4-1739)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Nursing Roles and Practices
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Keywords
chronic disease, stepped care, practitioner role, specialist care, primary care physicians, practice nurses, major depressive disorder, asthma, diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure
MeSH terms
Asthma, Chronic Disease, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Depressive Disorder, Diabetes Mellitus, Family Practice, Health Services Research, Heart Failure, Humans, Job Description, Medicine, Nurse Practitioners, Referral and Consultation, Specialization, United States, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Cost of Illness, Total Quality Management, Health Care Reform, Community Health Planning, Evidence-Based Medicine, Disease Management, Needs Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review