Cited by 103Schizophrenia research and treatmentVisual perception and processing mechanismsMotor Control and Adaptation

Eye movements and the search for the essence of schizophrenia

Holzman, P·2000·Brain Research Reviews

Abstract

Clinical Schizophrenia has eluded precise description because of its protean phenotypic manifestations and variable clinical course, a variability that also makes it difficult to discover genetic linkages. Co-familial traits have higher recurrence risk rates than schizophrenia itself and might serve as pointers to the underlying physiology of schizophrenic illness. A dysfunction of smooth pursuit eye movements is one such co-familial trait that occurs in about 40 to 80% of schizophrenic patients and about 25 to 40% of their first degree relatives. The eye movement abnormality appears only when the subject tracks a moving target. We have traced this abnormality to a deficit in velocity sensitivity, a function that is regulated by a specific central nervous system network that includes the middle temporal and medial superior temporal areas of the extra-striate cortex. The higher familial recurrence risk of abnormal eye tracking, compared with that of clinical schizophrenia (about 5 to 8%), suggests that schizophrenic psychosis may be the rare form of a more prevalent disorder whose symptoms are much milder and more benign than the cognitive and behavioral disturbances of the clinical psychosis. From this vantage point, abnormal eye tracking can be viewed as one pleiotropic manifestation of schizophrenia, considered broadly, just as the café-au-lait spots of neurofibromatosis are a more benign and more frequent manifestation of that disease than are the neurofibromata.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0165-0173(99)00051-x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 26 · Cited by 103

Authors
Holzman, P.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Holzman, P
Venue
Brain Research Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-03
Volume
31
Issue
2-3
Pages
350-356
ISSN
0165-0173 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2082992343
Cited by
103
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
6.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Research Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH049487, MH 31340, P01MH031154, MH-31154, MH 49487, R01MH031340)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
Keywords
schizophrenia, smooth pursuit eye movements, eye tracking, velocity sensitivity, familial recurrence risk, first-degree relatives, middle temporal cortex, extrastriate cortex, pleiotropy, genetic linkage
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Humans, Schizophrenia, Ocular Motility Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review