Eye movements and the search for the essence of schizophrenia
Abstract
Clinical Schizophrenia has eluded precise description because of its protean phenotypic manifestations and variable clinical course, a variability that also makes it difficult to discover genetic linkages. Co-familial traits have higher recurrence risk rates than schizophrenia itself and might serve as pointers to the underlying physiology of schizophrenic illness. A dysfunction of smooth pursuit eye movements is one such co-familial trait that occurs in about 40 to 80% of schizophrenic patients and about 25 to 40% of their first degree relatives. The eye movement abnormality appears only when the subject tracks a moving target. We have traced this abnormality to a deficit in velocity sensitivity, a function that is regulated by a specific central nervous system network that includes the middle temporal and medial superior temporal areas of the extra-striate cortex. The higher familial recurrence risk of abnormal eye tracking, compared with that of clinical schizophrenia (about 5 to 8%), suggests that schizophrenic psychosis may be the rare form of a more prevalent disorder whose symptoms are much milder and more benign than the cognitive and behavioral disturbances of the clinical psychosis. From this vantage point, abnormal eye tracking can be viewed as one pleiotropic manifestation of schizophrenia, considered broadly, just as the café-au-lait spots of neurofibromatosis are a more benign and more frequent manifestation of that disease than are the neurofibromata.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Visual processing deficits represent a possible heritable vulnerability factor for schizophrenia.
“suggesting that they represent a possible heritable vulnerability factor for the disorder (95).”
From Sensory Processing Dysfunction in the Personal Experience and Neuronal Machinery of Schizophrenia (2015) · cites this paper as [95]
Deficits in visual processing are consistently observed not only in schizophrenia patients but also in unaffected family members.
“As in the early Holzman studies, deficits in visual processing are consistently observed not only in schizophrenia patients but also in unaffected family members”
From Sensory Processing Dysfunction in the Personal Experience and Neuronal Machinery of Schizophrenia (2015) · cites this paper as [95]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 26 · Cited by 103
- Authors
- Holzman, P.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Holzman, P
- Venue
- Brain Research Reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-03
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 350-356
- ISSN
- 0165-0173 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2082992343
- Cited by
- 103
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 6.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Brain Research Reviews (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH049487, MH 31340, P01MH031154, MH-31154, MH 49487, R01MH031340)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Keywords
- schizophrenia, smooth pursuit eye movements, eye tracking, velocity sensitivity, familial recurrence risk, first-degree relatives, middle temporal cortex, extrastriate cortex, pleiotropy, genetic linkage
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Brain, Humans, Schizophrenia, Ocular Motility Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review