Cited by 74Health and Well-being StudiesHealth disparities and outcomesAging, Health, and Disability

Perceived social support among depressed elderly, middle-aged, and young-adult samples: cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses

Lynch, Thomas R, Mendelson, Tamar, Robins, Clive J, Krishnan, K.Ranga R, George, Linda K, Johnson, Courtney S, Blazer, Dan G·1999·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background A number of studies have concluded that the perceived quality of support is more strongly associated with mental health than with the actual structure of personal networks. This study examined clinical, historical, and phenomenological variables associated cross-sectionally and longitudinally with perceived social support.Methods Participants included elderly, middle-aged, and young-adult depressed samples derived from the Duke Clinical Research Center for the Study of Depression in Late Life.Results Cross-sectional multivariate analyses revealed that perceived social support was: (1) for the elderly associated with pessimistic thinking, being divorced, having strange ideas, the degree of social interaction, and instrumental support; (2) for middle-age associated with dysthymia, divorce, pessimistic thoughts, social interaction, and instrumental support; and (3) among young adults with instrumental support only. Longitudinal multivariate analyses indicated that only perceived social support at Time 1 predicted perceived social support 1 year later among elderly and middle-aged subjects, whereas only instrumental support predicted perceived social support 1 year later among the young-adult sample.Limitations The small number of subjects among the young-adult sample limit conclusions regarding this group. In addition, only patients provided data. Future studies should consider using multiple informants to enhance the accuracy of reported social support.Conclusions Our findings indicate that in addition to whatever else they do for depressed patients, clinicians must endeavor to address relationship or social support difficulties, especially in the elderly.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0165-0327(99)00017-8

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lynch, T. R., Mendelson, T., Robins, C. J., Krishnan, K. R. R., George, L. K., Johnson, C. S., & Blazer, D. G.
Affiliations
Duke University (US)
Corresponding author
Lynch, Thomas R
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-10
Volume
55
Issue
2-3
Pages
159-170
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2013608402
Cited by
74
References
36
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
FWCI
1.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH054846, MH 40159, MH-54846)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Health and Well-being Studies
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
Keywords
perceived social support, depression, older adults, middle-aged adults, young adults, instrumental support, divorce, social interaction, dysthymia, social networks, geriatric depression
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aging, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Self Concept, Social Support

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review